A few things about Ford Engines (V8)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 01-31-2005, 09:32 AM
Tang419's Avatar
Tang419
Tang419 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

The older 302 blocks, are a little heavier built than the later models, because in the 80's they were trying to save weight. The biggest thing about a 302 isn't really the block, it is the heads. Grab you about any 60's or 70's 302 and rebuild it, find you some better heads, preferribly keep it between '68 and '76 heads, because in '77 they went to heads that have 67cc-70cc combustion chambers on both the 302 and 351. Those suck for building power. Then get you an a Weiand Stealth intake, a CompCams Xtreme 4x4 cam, a decent set of headers (you can get a set of Dynomax's under the Summit name for $79) and a 600cfm carb of your choice.

Me personally, I wouldn't trade an FE out for a small block, because I really like the FE's . I would try to find a used 390 cheap (they do exsist, my father-in-law gave a '63 Thunderbird 390 away, complete and running). I didn't see where you are from, but I have a complete 360 laying out here, that came out of a '76 F-150. Then again, if you are set on getting away from the FE's, I would go with a 351W insteads of a 302. Stronger block, strong crank, and more torque for the same amount of money.
 
  #17  
Old 01-31-2005, 09:49 AM
Tang419's Avatar
Tang419
Tang419 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Almost forgot, the 361 and 391 FT engines came with steel cranks, but the frotn snouts were too big for car dampers to go on them. So the snouts had to be turned down to use it in a car engine.

The 351M, came about when Ford figured out the 351W wasnt enough to supply to the demand for an engine of that size, and they had canceled the 351C a few years back. BUT, if you are paying attention, you now know you can use a 400 crank, in a 351W block to make a junkyard 408 stroker. You just have to clearance everything for the longer throws.


Now I want to say, I appoligize if I came across as a know it all. I by no means claim to know it all, and at 23 I'm sure I have a lot more to learn. I just wanted to share what I have learned so far.

Please, I don't need more work
 
  #18  
Old 01-31-2005, 02:20 PM
Tang419's Avatar
Tang419
Tang419 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh yea, I looked it back up, the 289 switched from a 5 bolt to a 6 bolt bell housing in mid '65 .

The 351C does share a bellhousing with the 289/302/351W, but the 351M shares a bell housing with the 400/429/460 .

The 351M, 351C, 400, 429, and 460 all share the same distributor also.
 

Last edited by Tang419; 01-31-2005 at 02:25 PM.
  #19  
Old 01-31-2005, 11:02 PM
Matts72's Avatar
Matts72
Matts72 is offline
Post Fiend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montana Territory
Posts: 10,323
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
way to repeat what I posted...

There are tons of performance parts available for the FE, its takes more money and searching, but the 360 is way more powerful than the 302.
 
  #20  
Old 01-31-2005, 11:32 PM
Tang419's Avatar
Tang419
Tang419 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not really that much searching anymore. Edelbrock makes heads, intakes and cams, MSD makes ignitions, lots of companies make headers. The FE is really making a come back.
 
  #21  
Old 02-02-2005, 11:13 AM
51ford fan's Avatar
51ford fan
51ford fan is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Seattle WA.
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Tang419
Oh yea, I looked it back up, the 289 switched from a 5 bolt to a 6 bolt bell housing in mid '65 .

The 351C does share a bellhousing with the 289/302/351W, but the 351M shares a bell housing with the 400/429/460 .

The 351M, 351C, 400, 429, and 460 all share the same distributor also.
Does the 351M use the C-6
 
  #22  
Old 02-03-2005, 12:22 AM
Matts72's Avatar
Matts72
Matts72 is offline
Post Fiend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montana Territory
Posts: 10,323
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Always. I've heard some people say the C4 or FMX came behind the 351M, basically they are full of schism. I've literally dealt with over 200 cars and trucks powered by a 351M or 400, and all the autos have been C6s.
 
  #23  
Old 02-05-2005, 07:30 AM
2020's Avatar
2020
2020 is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I have seen 351M cars with C-4s,I haven't seen the C-4 behind a 400.I have owned 2 351M T-birds with the FMX but I don't recall seeing a 400 with anything but a C-6.
 
  #24  
Old 03-11-2005, 11:50 AM
ronclark's Avatar
ronclark
ronclark is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Fleming Ga
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ford generally put the c4 behind 302 and smaller blocks, the FMX behind the 351 blocks(supposed to be stronger) and the c6 behind the big blocks although they made a small bell housing c6 and used them in trucks.
 
  #25  
Old 05-13-2005, 05:21 AM
BigF350's Avatar
BigF350
BigF350 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne, Aus
Posts: 18,790
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Thought I may add, not that important, but still it is something.

The 302 was still fitted into the Falcon in Australia up until 2002,
There was also a 5.6l stroker kit for the 302 available from the factory up until 2002 as well over here.
 
  #26  
Old 05-13-2005, 11:46 AM
Matts72's Avatar
Matts72
Matts72 is offline
Post Fiend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montana Territory
Posts: 10,323
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
302s are still available from Ford Racing here in the states, along with a 347 (5.6L) stroker kit... We also have 5.4L 331 stroker kits....
 
  #27  
Old 05-22-2005, 09:27 AM
pmeisel's Avatar
pmeisel
pmeisel is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vermilion Ohio
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There were a few C4s behind 351Ms -- here's why...

Ford has always mix-managed powertrains to match availability, capacity, popularity, etc.

When the C4 and C6 came out they were destined to replace the older o-matics. However the FMX (improved hybrid of the FX and MX o-matics, introduced in 1967) was still needed because Ford couldn't make enough of the C4s and C6s. So the C6 went into the biggest stuff, the C4 into the smallest stuff, and they used the FMX in between as it was strong enough to handle the bigger V8s but fit okay in the mid-size stuff too.

When the second gas crunch hit, car sales went south, FWD started into the mix, and they didn't need the FMX anymore so they closed that plant to save money. But the 351M hadm't died yet and they didn't have enough C6s (remember trucks were still selling okay) so guess what, the C4 became the swing tranny. However the 351M died after 82 (I think the FMX died after 1980, we may have built some 1981s, most of the guys I know who would remember are long gone) so there weren't many.

Ford has done and still does some crazy stuff because of money, engineering timing, and sometimes executive whim (the back of the Windstar van was sized to accomodate Ed Hagenlocker's briefcase, endwise.)
 
  #28  
Old 05-22-2005, 09:40 AM
pmeisel's Avatar
pmeisel
pmeisel is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vermilion Ohio
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BigF350
Thought I may add, not that important, but still it is something.

The 302 was still fitted into the Falcon in Australia up until 2002,
There was also a 5.6l stroker kit for the 302 available from the factory up until 2002 as well over here.
Just useful trivia -- the 302s used in Australia were built in Cleveland until 2000. The 2001/2002 302s were built in 2000 as well and packaged to store awhile. The last factory 302 was built the week before Xmas, 2000. I was one of the lucky few to watch the last ones go.
 
  #29  
Old 05-22-2005, 09:43 AM
pmeisel's Avatar
pmeisel
pmeisel is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vermilion Ohio
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 312
we can also cover the mercury lincoln engines 383,410,430,462 from 58 to 68.the 383,430 was used in 58 to 60 mercs.the 410 in edsels in 58.the 430 in lincolns became the 462 around 65.they shared the same bell and flywheel as the fe.everything else was their own.you used to see a lot of them in old fords in late fifties.i remember seeing one in a 56 .guy wanted 35.oo for the car.
These were called the MEL engines, for Mercury Edsel Lincoln, built in Lima, Ohio. The production line was converted over for the 385 series during 1967 (1968 model year).
 
  #30  
Old 05-24-2005, 08:30 PM
10MPG's Avatar
10MPG
10MPG is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
302 HO's have a 351w firing order,starting in'82.
 


Quick Reply: A few things about Ford Engines (V8)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 PM.