Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

Air Filters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 07:11 PM
  #1  
RICE H8R's Avatar
RICE H8R
Thread Starter
|
Laughing Gas
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: small town, north dakota
Air Filters

I have a '95 f-150, 5.8L. It's about time to get a new air filter for it. My question is what is good, bad, etc? Any suggestions for a new filter? I've heard that K&N's aren't always that great, and the Airhogs are similar to the K&N's. Any specific brands I should get? Or perhaps just go to Wally world and pick something up. Thanks.

 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 08:57 PM
  #2  
Saurian's Avatar
Saurian
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 3
From: Centerville, Iowa
You know we all hate Fram, right? My only comment is to ask you to please not purchase the Fram product. Inferior products demand a loss of sales - which will either further hurt thier bottom line as it continues, or the development of decent products to replace those that are not as good.

As long as you keep your paper stock replacement filters clean, you'll be ok. The K&N's don't give you any gain, really. Little to none, I should say. Plus they do not filter as well as you stock paper filter. Course you do save money with a K&N.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 09:16 PM
  #3  
Bluffer's Avatar
Bluffer
New User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
What it is you dont like about Fram filters? thats all Ive ever used & yet to have any problems with them. Oil or air. thats all they make is filters, seems like a product you could trust.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 09:32 PM
  #4  
Saurian's Avatar
Saurian
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 3
From: Centerville, Iowa
Poor anti-drainback valves in their oil filters is my top concern. Second is the presence of CARDBOARD in the filter. They claim it is for a better bond between the glue and the actual filter element. Sure, in an OIL-only environment the cardboard shouldn't be bugged. But water does get itself in the crankcase. Water + Cardboard = failed oil filter. They also have larger openings in the filter media which allows unfiltered oil to return, making up for thier increased pressure drop across the filter media itself.

The air filter's, I don't know how you can mess up an air filter. But I didn't think you could mess up an oil filter, either. I did notice more dust in my filter housing on top in my 300-6 that I (stupidly) changed to a Fram air filter (convenience, sorry). With my Motorcraft it seemed to seal better.

My main point is that if we don't show Fram that their product isn't worth buying as it is, they either have to change or keep the uninformed people buying their product with commercials which makes their products MORE expensive then a quality Motorcraft filter. Wix would be my second choise in filters, Wix/Napa Gold. Motorcraft and Purolator are my filters of choice. If Motorcraft is good enough for Ford from the factory, it's good enough for me. If I can get it in Motorcraft, I'm gonna get it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 07:21 AM
  #5  
guzzler96's Avatar
guzzler96
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 537
Likes: 2
From: Alabama
Question

Originally Posted by Saurian
Poor anti-drainback valves in their oil filters is my top concern. Second is the presence of CARDBOARD in the filter. They claim it is for a better bond between the glue and the actual filter element. Sure, in an OIL-only environment the cardboard shouldn't be bugged. But water does get itself in the crankcase. Water + Cardboard = failed oil filter. They also have larger openings in the filter media which allows unfiltered oil to return, making up for thier increased pressure drop across the filter media itself.
I am curious as to where all these facts came from and who ran the test. If they are on a website please post a link. I would like to read this.



Thanks,
guzzler96
 
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 07:31 AM
  #6  
RR4E's Avatar
RR4E
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
I've ran a variety of filters over the years. Had well over 300,000 hard miles on my father's 1972 F100 with standard steering and standard brakes as a farm truck with a 302, 3 speed column shift and only used fram filters.......If you want a dust environment....try grain farming, hay baling, and whatever else you can throw at it.....It never missed a beat, and getting closer to the 400,000 mile mark, it started to chug a lot of oil due to worn crank and cam bearings, as well as worn valve seals and guides. That truck earned it's time, and I repplaced the engine afterwards and had a few more year's use out of it until it was sold recently. I was planning on restoring it, but the parents sold the farm and could no longer store it for me, no place to store it myself as I live in an apartment, so off it went. Fram makes a fine product, I've heard good and bad, and as yet have to see a reason NOT to use them, based on personal experience. We used frams on everything we owned on the farm, and most if not all of our equipment lasted better than 10-15 years, as we were not rich, not could we afford top of the line rigs.....but we gave everything regular oil changes/maintenance, and never suffered a breakdown from a filter flaw, oil breakdown, etc.

Fram's motto....Pay me now, or pay me later. I won't say others are bad, but I've never had a problem with fram.
 
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 07:43 AM
  #7  
RICE H8R's Avatar
RICE H8R
Thread Starter
|
Laughing Gas
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: small town, north dakota
Originally Posted by RR4E
.......If you want a dust environment....try grain farming, hay baling, and whatever else you can throw at it.....
That's alot of my pickup gets put thru. In the summer it's on a farm alot of the time...hauling bales, flying down the field tailing a dusty combine, and everything else farm affiliated. Also theres lots of mud, snow, and dusty roads.
 
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 08:03 AM
  #8  
BandBFord's Avatar
BandBFord
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 329
Likes: 1
From: Virginia
Heres a few....

http://minimopar.knizefamily.net/oilfilterstudy.html

http://www.ntpog.org/reviews/filters/filters.shtml

http://www.hybridhut.com/tech-oil_filter_review.htm

http://wetwesties1.tripod.com/oilfilterstudy/



I have personally been involved in a lengthy oil filter study (one of my previous career requirements) and fram scored the lowest of 20 filters tested. Baldwin (my personal choice and top scoring), Wix, and Fleetguard were tops in all test conducted.

To answer your question... Air Filters...

We also tested air filters and found that non-oiled paper elements do not fair as well as their washable, oiled conterparts. (K&N being one of these). Horsepower gains were almost none existent when switching between filters. Dirt particles were filtered better by the oiled filters over time however, a high quality paper element did perform well... The key here is service and quality.

I personally use K&N air filters and have used them for 30 years never once having a filter related failure on any car, truck or motocross, enduro bike I have used them on. I have abused them under some of the worst conditions possible and their service has reinforced my belief in the product offered. Granted, you have to service them and that is one aspect I like about a washable filter (Not just K&N). I feel that a higher quality product is produced if it must hold up for multiple years (or services) instead of being mass produced and tossed every few thousand miles.

IF I decided to use paper elements it would be Baldwin or Wix...

http://www.baldwinfilter.com/

http://www.fleetguard.com/fleet/en/i...?SMIDENTITY=NO

http://www.wixfilters.com/
 

Last edited by BandBFord; Dec 3, 2004 at 08:05 AM.
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 08:14 AM
  #9  
Saurian's Avatar
Saurian
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 3
From: Centerville, Iowa
Originally Posted by guzzler96
I am curious as to where all these facts came from and who ran the test. If they are on a website please post a link. I would like to read this.



Thanks,
guzzler96

Guzzler - Slide down to the Oil & Lubrication forum, all the information you could possibly want to know (or anybody!) is locked away deep in those wonderful archive's. The Fram issue has been hashed over many times.

Band, studies that I've seen showed the paper elements to filter better than a new, out of the box K&N. K&N also admits that paper elements have a better filtration until the K&N starts to become dirty, which the dirt actually helps to increase filtration potential/capacity. But at this point, the flow starts to go down. Interesting that this may potentially be reversed?

As for performance gains..I did have a K&N on my old car, and I believe it did have a little bit better TOP END pep. But I digress...

NOTE: For air filters, the stock F-150 intakes are NOT known for their sealing-capacity. My old truck was on a farm, so that may have potentially been part of the problem. I can't really see any filter performing better or worse...it REALLY is hard to mess up. If you're worried about a seal, just smear a bit of vaseline just around the edges of your bottom lip, and then replace. Or RTV...whatever you'd like. And as I note the poor sealing of the airbox, this is one reason that the K&N FIPK actually returns better results, it stops any leaks there may be, gives you a sealed intake.
 
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 09:07 AM
  #10  
wickymustang's Avatar
wickymustang
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Some Motorcraft parts are better than what you can pick up at the local parts store, but would you honestly spend 5 dollars more per vehicle to put in top of the line filters when you are in the business to make as much money as possible? I have always used FRAM because my dad has always used FRAM, and he used it because his dad always did. In that whole time there has never been a single failure or problem related to filters. My dad gets a minimum of 500,000 miles on every vehicle that he buys. He swears by FRAM and so do I.
 
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2004 | 09:40 AM
  #11  
RR4E's Avatar
RR4E
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Fram makes many types of filters, and that's all they make. My word of advice....change your oil and filter on time, change your air filter regularly(I like K&N air filters for everything, and clean mine every 50,000 miles as recommended, or once a year, whichever comes first) and you won;t have to many problems. Use a good quality oil, and change it eery 5000 k or 2500 miles and you should be fine. If you do a lot of city driving, and very little or no highway driving, change it a bit earlier, say 2000 miles or 4300k(roughly)

The reason I'm not a huge fan of Wix filters is the fact I had one burst on me once, and it damned near cost me an engine.

When I converted to power steering on the 69, I had to switch to a shorter filter, and fram was the only one to offer one with the same gasket, but shorter body length. In better than 60,000 miles, regular oil changes, the truck ran like a top, compression down by 2 lbs in the lowest cylinder, and no smoke, or major oil consumption in an FE block 390 punched out .060 over, prior to my selling it. I miss that truck btw...and am looking for another like her.....
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:12 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE