Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

First Trip to the Track.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2004 | 09:21 AM
  #1  
resqdawg3's Avatar
resqdawg3
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: Eielson AFB, AK
First Trip to the Track.

Took the rig out to the track last night to make some passes. Here are some observations.... (see sig for mods BTW, and track is a 1000' track, no 1/4 miles here in AR)

1. Launching in 2wd on 100HP setting causes nothing but tire spin to well past the 330' mark, and up past 4th gear.
2. Brake boosting is your friend.
3. 4wd lauches are like taking off on a rocket ship!
4. 100HP mode is more than enough power to beat all the local ricers.

My first run (4wd launch, 100HP mode, little brake boost), took me to a 2.1 60' with a 12.4 run. My next run (2wd launch, 100HP mode, lotsa brake boost), took me to a 3.4 60' with a 19.8 run. This is why you don't launch in 2wd, nothing but tire spin and lotsa rubber sprayed on to the truck. hehehe Third run of the night, best one BTW (4wd launch, 100HP mode, lotsa brake boost), took me to a 1.9 60' with an 11.7 run. :woot: Everyone couldn't believe it! It was really movin'!!

I must say that for less than $700 in mods this truck is just simply amazing! I lost every race that I ran, but I was only there for times and to have fun!
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2004 | 10:06 AM
  #2  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Are you flipping out of 4wd after launch?
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2004 | 02:15 PM
  #3  
resqdawg3's Avatar
resqdawg3
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: Eielson AFB, AK
Nope, left it in all the way down the track. I was trapping around 85-87mph too.
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2004 | 02:42 PM
  #4  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
That is sure turning a lot of mass in the drive train
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2004 | 04:02 PM
  #5  
resqdawg3's Avatar
resqdawg3
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: Eielson AFB, AK
Yeah, I had thought about turning it off once I got out of the hole, but just concentrated more on keeping the truck in a straight line v. worrying about turning off the 4wd. I imagine it could have made for a few tenths' better times. I'll have to try it when I go to the track next.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 12:18 AM
  #6  
Daryl Hunter's Avatar
Daryl Hunter
Cargo Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 0
From: Carlsbad, California
You can flip it back to 2WD after the launch but it won't disengage due to the load on the drive train. It will flip back to 2WD after you let off the throttle and coast/brake down the pit lane turn in.

These trucks are relatively quick for their size, but once you've had a bit of practice, you'll find that you have time to do all sorts of things as you are waiting for the end of the track to come. You can flip back to 2WD, adjust your mirrors, do your taxes, etc.

Another suggestion that someone had was to switch to T/H mode after the launch to use the slightly higher shift points. The suggestion was not to launch in T/H mode though because of the lower stall speed of the TC in that mode.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 11:32 AM
  #7  
skippyp's Avatar
skippyp
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Pearland, TX
well, I'm used to the old 0-60 time expression. So what does a '2.1 60' with a 12.4 run' mean? I'm guessing that's a 12.4 second quarter mile. Am I so naive as to think 0-60 or 0-100mph is a useful metric?

Thanks for the great post.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 02:43 PM
  #8  
$trokin60's Avatar
$trokin60
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
rd what kind of cab configuration do you have. I have a 4X4 crew cab long bed I cant seem to get lower than 14.404.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 03:08 PM
  #9  
Daryl Hunter's Avatar
Daryl Hunter
Cargo Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 0
From: Carlsbad, California
Originally Posted by skippyp
well, I'm used to the old 0-60 time expression. So what does a '2.1 60' with a 12.4 run' mean? I'm guessing that's a 12.4 second quarter mile. Am I so naive as to think 0-60 or 0-100mph is a useful metric?

Thanks for the great post.
A 2.1 second 60 foot time coupled with a 12.4 second 1/4 mile ET would mean that the vehicle was slow to get off the line but made up for it on the top end.

My 60' times with the SCMT in high power mode were 1.924 s and 1.902 s respectively for the two runs that I did. The 1/4 mile ET and MPH for each run were 14.332 s at 93.270 MPH and 14.338 s at 93.01 MPH respectively.

In the first run you can see that my 60' time was slightly worse but that the 1/4 mile ET was slightly better as was the MPH - so I made up for the difference in speed in the end of the track.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 04:14 PM
  #10  
SpartanDieselTech's Avatar
SpartanDieselTech
Former Vendor
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,362
Likes: 3
From: Hendersonville, NC
Keep in mind we are talking 1000 ft drag; not full quarter mile. See the original post.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 05:46 PM
  #11  
Daryl Hunter's Avatar
Daryl Hunter
Cargo Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 0
From: Carlsbad, California
Oh duh.

So the 12.4 s 1000 ft run works out to something like 14.9 s in the 1/4 mile give or take a bit.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 08:01 PM
  #12  
resqdawg3's Avatar
resqdawg3
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: Eielson AFB, AK
To answer a posted question....My truck is a 4x4 Crew cab with the short bed. And yes, all times posted are 1000' and not a full 1/4 mile. Arkansas doesn't have any 1/4 mile tracks in the entire state. Kinda gay, but oh well. I'll have to try that T/H thing too. My last run of the night, when I ran that 11.9, I was in T/H from the launch. I'll try switching it on after the launch next time. Good idea!
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 08:12 PM
  #13  
Hoss350's Avatar
Hoss350
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Tustin,(orange county) Ca.
That's still awesome times for a big a$$ truck, I'm very impressed, I what are you taking your tac up to at the line with your brake boost, I still keep getting alot of turbo lag, but I'm only going up to 1000 rpms. But my truck is stock as well though.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 08:16 PM
  #14  
resqdawg3's Avatar
resqdawg3
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: Eielson AFB, AK
Holding the truck to somewhere around 2300 or so. I think. Full pressure on the brake pedal and foot on the gas right to the point where the truck wants to move...Then hold it.
I'd have to look to be sure, but I wanna say that it is in the ballpark.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 11:32 PM
  #15  
Hoss350's Avatar
Hoss350
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Tustin,(orange county) Ca.
I'll have to try that out, I can't wait to get a exhaust and what not, I hear about all this power potential these things have and it's driving me crazy!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE