Notices
Offroad & 4x4
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Propane vs. fuel injection

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 03:02 PM
  #1  
ivanribic's Avatar
ivanribic
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,945
Likes: 3
From: Spokane, WA
Propane vs. fuel injection

Anyone have thoughts on propane vs fuel injection for a trail rig looking to see some crazy angles? Are there advantages/disadvantages to one over the other? I'm looking at this for a 302 or 351W. I'm somewhat familiar with the Impco LP conversions and know that propane is high octane allowing for a great compression ratio. Other than that I'm clueless and I don't know anything about fuel injection.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 03:21 PM
  #2  
proeliator's Avatar
proeliator
Post Fiend
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,238
Likes: 3
From: Oregon
About all I know is that propane injection is simpler and you can run flat out stupid compression ratios. Didn't help much, huh? Its the "simple" part that I like. I want to see whats up with running propane gas over liquid propane. I figure once the bombs start dropping it will that much simpler to get your truck to run off methane if its already set up for propane. Methane will always be in ready supply...
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 03:40 PM
  #3  
ivanribic's Avatar
ivanribic
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,945
Likes: 3
From: Spokane, WA
I don't know all the details as to why but I know it's typically recommended that you use liquid instead of gas for any kind of vehicle. Therefore guys using propane tanks from BBQ's have to install them upside down. You have some sort of device that prevents your line from freezing up at the carb when the liquid converts to gas. But again, I'm not sure why they prefer liquid.

The high compression deal is what I like about it. I'm getting really tempted to buy that BII and will (eventually) put a stroked 302 or 351 in there. Just trying to figure out why route to go.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 03:48 PM
  #4  
proeliator's Avatar
proeliator
Post Fiend
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,238
Likes: 3
From: Oregon
Yea, most everybody uses lp but I know you can use it in its gaseous form...its just more complicated. I've always thought it would be cool to set it up that way because methane wouldn't be that far off. Then you could run it off poo juice

I think you NEED that BII
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 04:17 PM
  #5  
hoxiii's Avatar
hoxiii
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,711
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh
You use liquid because it's something along the lines of 100 times more compressed than gaseous. If you were to try to run a tank of gaseous propane you'd have to have one the size of the entire rear of a BII to make it around the block. (A bit of an exaggeration, but close enough).

EDIT: Also gaseous propane is highly explosive. LP is basically inert until it vaporizes.

Also, just going propane you lose ALOT of power (15% ish). You actually have to go nuts with teh compression just to get back to where you were before, but you can go nuts past that to get some more.

The easiest setup is to run a carburetor that the propane injects directly into, that way if need be you can swap back to gas if you lose a LP line or soemthing like that.

BUT, between FI and propane I'd go propane in a heartbeat. it will run at ANY angle (FI starves if the fuel pump is uncovered), burns super clean, and is hella cheap.

Look around, there are plenty of "How to"s online.

Justin
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 04:24 PM
  #6  
ivanribic's Avatar
ivanribic
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,945
Likes: 3
From: Spokane, WA
Why do you use a lot of power with propane? Not arguing but I just don't understand it. Propane is approximately 115 octane. That should equate to a power increase but also allow you to run something stupid like a 12.5:1 or even higher.

Also, "gas" propane systems don't take up any more room than LP. ALL your propane is liquid while bottled, from your camp lanterns to BBQ's to rigs (that's why they call is LPG for "liquid propane gas" vs. LP for plain old "liquid propane"). The difference is most will feed off the top of the tank, as the liquid depressurizes and becomes a gas whereas with a LP setup you are feeding from the bottom of your tank, bringing the liquid itself through the line.
 

Last edited by ivanribic; Sep 8, 2004 at 04:28 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 04:38 PM
  #7  
95-F-350-4x4's Avatar
95-F-350-4x4
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
From: Chatsworth, CA
i think propane is just a poor man's fuel injection. if you have the money do it right and go fuel injection. i haven't seen any aftermarket fulie systems for ford big blocks though.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 04:58 PM
  #8  
RawPower's Avatar
RawPower
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
From: Rep. of Texas
Get an '05 powerstroke, NOS, Propane, Chip it, twin turbo, water injection, etc. and youll be doing good...

Go propane, UNLESS FI is only 100-200 more than the propane (kit and a full tank) because youll pay for the FI depending on usage, that is eventually.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 05:14 PM
  #9  
brokebronco's Avatar
brokebronco
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
From: Bryan/College Station
Propane is higher octane but has less BTU's.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 05:25 PM
  #10  
ivanribic's Avatar
ivanribic
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,945
Likes: 3
From: Spokane, WA
That makes sense brokebronco.

My hesitation about fuel injection is I don't want more electronics to worry about. The vehicle will probably see a fair amount of time in the water and muck too so the less I have to worry about the better. Of course I could always mount the computer in the cab up high so that's not TOO big a deal.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 05:52 PM
  #11  
jopey's Avatar
jopey
Elder User
25 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
From: Bay area
I am currently running gas. I have thought about pane but I have ultimatly decided to go with TBI injection on my engine. Since there was never any EFI ever designed for it TBI is pretty much bolt on to the intake, hook up some wires and a few hoses and I am good to go.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 07:49 PM
  #12  
bremen242's Avatar
bremen242
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,739
Likes: 3
From: GANS
Originally Posted by ivanribic
Why do you use a lot of power with propane? Not arguing but I just don't understand it. Propane is approximately 115 octane. That should equate to a power increase but also allow you to run something stupid like a 12.5:1 or even higher.

Also, "gas" propane systems don't take up any more room than LP. ALL your propane is liquid while bottled, from your camp lanterns to BBQ's to rigs (that's why they call is LPG for "liquid propane gas" vs. LP for plain old "liquid propane"). The difference is most will feed off the top of the tank, as the liquid depressurizes and becomes a gas whereas with a LP setup you are feeding from the bottom of your tank, bringing the liquid itself through the line.
I think it is all the same. I think you are just talking symmantics. All propane turns into gas or a liquid depending on the temperature and the pressure. When you pressurize the gas, it becomes liquid. With you depressurize it, it becomes a gas again.

Now, when you are talking about natural gas, as Hoxiii said, you'd have to carry a huge tank to drive like 100miles...

I think I am going to run propane once I put a blower on my 351w. That way I can run 8.5:1 compression with at least 10psi of boost and not detonant.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 07:58 PM
  #13  
rlh's Avatar
rlh
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Florida Hill Country
Originally Posted by jopey
I am currently running gas. I have thought about pane but I have ultimatly decided to go with TBI injection on my engine. Since there was never any EFI ever designed for it TBI is pretty much bolt on to the intake, hook up some wires and a few hoses and I am good to go.
Is TBI worth the money? I've been looking into options for my F350's 460. It runs good most of the time, but occasionally it has a day where it won't run for crap or beer. I've looked at the Holley Pro-Jection EFI conversion which is $800 for ford V8s up to $275 hp. The other option was the Holley Truck Avenger that is supposed to help out in towing and weird angles but they are over $400 but probably better than tbi. Then there is the Edlebrock Performer Carbs.

I'm currently back to propane consideration. There are 2 ways, dual fuel set up and straight propane. The later is better for performance etc but you have to run propane only. The first option is more flexible, but it doesn't do that great on either and the engine really needs to built to run on propane . . . dang . . . I'm back to efi . . .
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 11:42 PM
  #14  
hoxiii's Avatar
hoxiii
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,711
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh
Yep, lower BTU count AND 115 octane only helps if the motor can take adavntage of the higher octane rating. the 115 means it's harder to burn, so if you have a motor that won't knock on 87 you actually lose power going to 115 since it takes more initial energy to burn. But go ape with compression and you'll be back and then some.

Justin
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2004 | 01:12 AM
  #15  
jopey's Avatar
jopey
Elder User
25 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
From: Bay area
I personelly would steer clear of anything holley sells.

I am personelly looking @ a Howell system. $1200 and they program the ECM to your engine.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE