When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
at Home Depot last night on a Silvarado. While I would not consider an option like that on my truck, it was pretty neat watching it in action. This fella zipped into a spot that I wouldn't have tried unless I had a jeep.
Personally I don't think this as big a spalsh as what GM thought it would..
I think it would still be a neat option to have. The man at the Anchorage GM dealership told me at 40 mph and under the front and back wheels turn opposite of each other... but when going over 40 the front and back wheels turn the same direction. I asked the purpose of this and he said it is beneficial for changing lanes while highway towing and just highway driving in general.
when you are going real fast and having all 4 wheels turning the same direction, its scary when your not used to it. i knew a guy with some japanese cars with them and it was weird.
I have QS in my 04 Yukon XL 2500. I guess because there are not a lot of them out there, there's a lot of disinformation. It is not scary in the least to make lane changes or any other time. It's a very nice option in a lot of ways. It's much more stable when towing since the trailer follows the vehicle better. Backing up the trailer is also a place where it really shines since corrections are so easy. Turning radius is almost the same as a Honda Accord (5" bigger) so parking lot maneuvering is a breeze.
You can turn it off and there's also a trailering mode. All the reviews I've read rave about it's trailer towing ability and so far I agree with them. I think the reason it's not very popular is that it was a $5k option up until recently. It was about a $1900 add to my truck.
The maker of the system, Delphi, is trying hard to expand to other manufacturers so it may end up in a Ford someday, too. It's true it has more moving parts but that's an ongoing issue with most new vehicles. Adding turbos, auto trannies, 4wd, etc are all risks over a more basic truck. It's all tradeoff's, I guess.
I have seen only a few. I am not impressed with it. Whoop-de-do you can manuever better and its easier to back up. I would not pay extra for it, it would have to be at a discount price. I would not trust all that GM mechaical crap under the axle that is supporting the heavy loads I haul. GM thought it would help sales, it hasant no one wants it, and it makes the truck look stupid.
I have been in many Japanese cars that have had this feature (Honda Prelude, Nissan Skyline GTR, Mazda Eunos 800 to name a few), and it was quite impressive, however in a load carrying truck I have my reservations.
A truck in my opinion should be as simple as possible.
BigF350, you have been in a skyline. those are extremely rare. you have to be joking right!!! i doubt if in the US you rode in one. there is less than 100 in the US of A.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.