EGR, how did it work?
Mine passed inspection, but there was some debate over wether or not I was suposed to have EGR.......
I'm running headers, edelbrock heads and RPM intake with a BG carb with a 14" round open air filter housing.
But he could not find anywhere to plumb it on the Edelbrock RPM intake. He let me slide....
It's cool He could have found a bunch of other things if he really wanted to be difficult. I mean, ut still has the external lubrication system, the fuel tank is just laying in the bed, strapped in with some basic cargo straps for now :-)
SO, overall I'm quite happy. but, just preparing for next year...they may be even tougher.
I'd love to prove his book wrong but it just gets them mad.
In '69 the pickups had IMCO (improved combustion) emission controls and that was only for the F100's, the F250's and above were exempt.
IMCO was a fancy way of saying a leaner carburetor setting and revised ignition timing.
Last edited by BB; Aug 20, 2004 at 07:53 PM.

Yeah they did away with that in '68 on cars but you see them on some later trucks though.
Trending Topics
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Sean, I'd be surprised. A high HP street vehicle is usually an efficient vehicle...at least it should be. I' not talking about a strictly race vehicle.
with good tuning, I bet my truck would burn cleaner than a lot of the newer vehicles on the road here in Texas that don't get tested for emissions.
with good tuning, I bet my truck would burn cleaner than a lot of the newer vehicles on the road here in Texas that don't get tested for emissions.
Obviously, my 390 didn't have anything, not even cats, and the HC and CO numbers were great, after playing with the carb just a tiny bit. My '76 Triumph TR7 had dual-side-draft Weber DCOE's on it and it only idled correctly after sitting on the emissions machine while I toyed with all four idle mix screws and idle speed. After that, it passed with flying colors, without a catalytic converter (came with one stock).
So yeah, there is something to be said for our hopped-up motors, the visual inspection is what usually gets us in trouble - ironic how not having an EGR will fail you, while your motor is probably burning cleaner than it was stock from the factory...

Here on Long Island, I've never had a visual inspection, but lately they have gotten more nervous. The guy I usually use told me a story how an EPA/DOT guy came down with a car with all the emissions stuff disconnected - EGR, etc had no vacuum hoses... and left the car to be inspected. When he came back, the shop owner told him that he couldn't pass him and that he should go get all that stuff put back on before trying it again. Guess what? He was cited for NOT doing the inspection and failing him outright, based on the visual inspection... he should have put it on the machine, done all the right things and just failed him without trying to give the guy a break.
Obviously, my 390 didn't have anything, not even cats, and the HC and CO numbers were great, after playing with the carb just a tiny bit. My '76 Triumph TR7 had dual-side-draft Weber DCOE's on it and it only idled correctly after sitting on the emissions machine while I toyed with all four idle mix screws and idle speed. After that, it passed with flying colors, without a catalytic converter (came with one stock).
So yeah, there is something to be said for our hopped-up motors, the visual inspection is what usually gets us in trouble - ironic how not having an EGR will fail you, while your motor is probably burning cleaner than it was stock from the factory...

Here on Long Island, I've never had a visual inspection, but lately they have gotten more nervous. The guy I usually use told me a story how an EPA/DOT guy came down with a car with all the emissions stuff disconnected - EGR, etc had no vacuum hoses... and left the car to be inspected. When he came back, the shop owner told him that he couldn't pass him and that he should go get all that stuff put back on before trying it again. Guess what? He was cited for NOT doing the inspection and failing him outright, based on the visual inspection... he should have put it on the machine, done all the right things and just failed him without trying to give the guy a break.
Just another example of a government beuracracy with wayyyyyyy to much time, and money, on its hands. My sonbe took his car in and the hose from the exhaust to the air cleaner had come loose. The guy pointed it out, my son started to re-connect it sliding back where it belongs, and the guy said no. Said he had to take it to a certified garage and have it done and then bring the paperwork back proving it was done by a certified mechanic. REDICULOUS.
Obviously didn't do that. He took it to a friend at Sears, and the guy signed off on it so he could get it passed. Hopefully I won't have any issues when I get this build done. AZ does not exempt vehicles after '67 from what I hear but there wan't any smog stuff on the truck to begin with. I HATE brainless government clones.







