Notices
Oil & Lubrication  

Engine Flushing.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 10:07 AM
  #16  
GrayRanger4x4's Avatar
GrayRanger4x4
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 1
From: Perry,Ga.
OK I"ll quit.



K&N filters are #1!!
hehe
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 12:13 PM
  #17  
rusty70f100's Avatar
rusty70f100
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,600
Likes: 3
From: Iowa
Well I run a drop in replacement K&N on my explorer, and my silicon reading after 3000 miles on the oil came back at 11. Below average according to blackstone. So I cant see where the K&N is hurting me at all.

I think some of it is that these obsessive compulsive people pull 'em off and clean 'em every 5000 miles when they change the oil. When they clean it so often, they probably damage the filter more than just leaving it well enough alone. This may cause some of the problems we hear about. It says right on the box not to clean it for 50,000 miles, since the accumulated dirt helps filtering. Mine has been on for 30,000 miles, and no loss of mileage or performance yet. Still works like the day I dropped it in.
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 12:38 PM
  #18  
Bob Ayers's Avatar
Bob Ayers
Postmaster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 3
From: Durham, NC
Originally Posted by rusty70f100
Well I run a drop in replacement K&N on my explorer, and my silicon reading after 3000 miles on the oil came back at 11. Below average according to blackstone. So I cant see where the K&N is hurting me at all.

I think some of it is that these obsessive compulsive people pull 'em off and clean 'em every 5000 miles when they change the oil. When they clean it so often, they probably damage the filter more than just leaving it well enough alone. This may cause some of the problems we hear about. It says right on the box not to clean it for 50,000 miles, since the accumulated dirt helps filtering. Mine has been on for 30,000 miles, and no loss of mileage or performance yet. Still works like the day I dropped it in.

Going that many miles before recommending cleaning should be an indication of how POOR a K&N filters!!!!
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 08:32 PM
  #19  
horsepuller's Avatar
horsepuller
FTE Leadership Emeritus
25 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,298
Likes: 45
From: Southern California
FTE Emeritus
FTE isn't here to do the cheerleading for lawsuits.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 11:17 AM
  #20  
horsepuller's Avatar
horsepuller
FTE Leadership Emeritus
25 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,298
Likes: 45
From: Southern California
FTE Emeritus
My appologies to forddytube. His "lawsuit" comment was meant to be humorous.

Thread reopened. Let's try and focus on the engine flush topic and not the K&N filter. As tempting as it may be!

Scott
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 11:46 AM
  #21  
mustangsvt's Avatar
mustangsvt
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
No cleaning for 50k BS. I drive in dusty conditions sometimes and my K&N cone in the FIPK needs cleaning almost every 7k. If they had a paper element for that thign i would get it cause i dnot think the filter would have much to do with the performance.......the cold air itself should be the best
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 09:09 PM
  #22  
forddytube's Avatar
forddytube
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
From: TAOS NM
appology excepted horsepuller. LETS GET IT ON.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
02GrayPowerStroke
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
22
Sep 16, 2018 02:30 PM
plummer
1997 - 2003 F150
8
Mar 12, 2015 09:03 PM
69ford99
2004 - 2008 F150
10
Sep 5, 2009 09:47 PM
IneptMechanic
1997 - 2003 F150
12
Apr 9, 2007 12:11 PM
Patatoe1
1997 - 2003 F150
5
Mar 15, 2006 09:18 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 AM.