Notices
Explorer, Sport Trac, Mountaineer & Aviator 1991-1994, 1995-2001, 2002-2005, 2006-2010 Ford Explorer

Codes 41+42 on 93 Explorer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 12:05 PM
  #1  
cb4492's Avatar
cb4492
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Codes 41+42 on 93 Explorer

Hi. I have a 93 Explorer 4x4 4.0 with 80,000 miles. The only EEC connector I can find is one with a cap on it labeled Anti Lock test that is identical to the EEC 4 connector. I was able to pull down 4 codes. 11,41,42,67. Obviously the ones of concern are 41 and 42. 41=EGO sensor running lean and 42=EGO sensor running rich. Quite a contadiction. Symptoms of trouble are hesitant start(usually 5 seconds to turn over), Strong gas odor from engine and from exhaust along with white smoke. I'm straying away from the head gasket being bad since I can't find anything to indicate that it might. Coolant is at level and proper color, oil is at color without any indications of mixing and Transy fluid is ok. Would a bad EGO sensor cause all of this trouble?
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 12:51 PM
  #2  
mrshorty's Avatar
mrshorty
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 2
From: UT
Yes it is an iteresting contradiction. It suggests to me that there might be a wiring fault rather than a faul in the O2 sensor itself. Also, I wouldn't necessarily call the 67 insignificant. The computer changes it's algorithm slightly when it thinks the transmission is in P or N. If there's a bad or intermittent fault in the PNP switch circuit, the computer might do some odd things. Here's what I'd do next.
1) You only indicate KOEO and continuous memory codes. Since, you passed the KOEO hard fault portion of the test, I'd run the KOER test. See if you are dealing with a consistent fault, or something so intermittent that it only shows up as continuous memory codes.
2) Clear the continuous memory codes (disconnect STI during anytime during KOEO or continuous memory code output), drive the truck, and see what code(s) come back.
3) Check fuel pressure. Make sure the pressure is where it should be, that it isn't leaking through the fuel pressure regulator into the intake, and that the injectors aren't stuck open.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 01:00 PM
  #3  
ranger88a's Avatar
ranger88a
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Usually, your o2 sensor is lazy and needs replaced. Check the vacuum hose to the fuel pressure regulator and make sure there is no fuel in it.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 01:21 PM
  #4  
cb4492's Avatar
cb4492
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Forgot to mention that it seems I'm getting fuel to mix into my oil. Level was a little high so I drained excess and its currently at proper level. I had added a quart of oil 2 days before these problems started to occur. Stick said it was a quart shy but after careful thinking it was on a slight angle. Didn't think it would be enough to show as low as a qurat. Will check the regulator.

Edit: Also I don't seem to have an STI hookup. While looking for information on this problem I stumbled acoss information saying that some vehicles over 88' don't use the STI, just the STO.
 

Last edited by cb4492; Jun 24, 2004 at 01:26 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 02:43 PM
  #5  
cb4492's Avatar
cb4492
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Did the KOER test with same results. Did find one interesting thing of note. You have 3 lines running up the rail. One goes to the regulator, one to the engine somewhere(by intake) and the other one once it reaches the engine compartment switches to a rubber hose which runs about 18" or so into a plastic 90 then has about 4" of rubber tubing. This one(rubber hose) I found laying lose beneath the power steering pump. Perhaps this is the root of the matter and if so does anyone know where it goes. I've been looking non stop and can't figure it out. Also, checked regulator for fuel leaking and seems dry as a bone.
 

Last edited by cb4492; Jun 24, 2004 at 03:10 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 04:15 PM
  #6  
cb4492's Avatar
cb4492
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
All right, desperatley need help with this. I found the correct eec harness and heres the codes I'm getting with the KOER test.

136-HEGO sensor voltage signal not switching during test (Bank#2)
172-HEGO sensor voltage signal indicates lean(Bank#1)
412-Cannot control RPM during test
536-(I didn't perform BOO test)
538 Insufficiant RPM change during test or Invalid Cylinder balance(throttle position movement) or Invalid cylinder balance test(cylinder Identifiacation problems)
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2004 | 06:06 PM
  #7  
mrshorty's Avatar
mrshorty
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 2
From: UT
fuel getting into the oil suggests that you are really running rich rather than lean. This might lead us to believe that there is a fault in the O2 sensors or the O2 sensor circuit. However, let's not jump to conclusions too fast. False lean codes can be set during the KOER test if the engine/O2 sensors aren't given an adequate chance to warm up before the test. Was the engine cold before the KOER test? Did you run the engine for several minutes before the KOER test to make sure the O2 sensors were at operating temperature. If yes, here's what I'd do:
1) Inspect the wiring between the O2 sensors and the PCM. Make sure there are no breaks/cuts/loose connections.
2) Check fuel pressure and check for fuel in the vacuum line to the FPR.
3) Check for excessive voltage drop across the PCM's ground wires.
4) Backprobe the O2 sensor's signal circuit and monitor O2 sensor output. After an initial warm up period, the O2 sensor should put out a voltage between 0 and 1 V that varies from low to high.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fordtrucker
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
May 25, 2022 12:51 PM
greystreak92
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
3
Mar 6, 2011 11:16 AM
xrl007
2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 4.0 & SOHC 4.0 V6
7
Oct 30, 2003 01:54 PM
restorit
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
6
Sep 24, 2003 10:48 PM
grousehunter
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Apr 3, 2003 09:39 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE