Notices

Rear end suggestions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2004 | 09:33 AM
  #1  
jroehl's Avatar
jroehl
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,473
Likes: 4
From: Lafayette, IN
Rear end suggestions?

(a little long, but please help me out here)

<!Ok, now that I've got my old F150 almost squared away (see sig) to be sold>, I'm going to be looking at doing some rear end work on my F250 (see sig).

The axle code on the doorpost is 35. The paperwork I got with the truck (bought a few months ago) says that it had 4.10 gears installed (at the dealer, I assume) when it was bought new. Coupled with the 351 @ 120k miles, I'm not liking the mileage--10 to 11 mpg. I do like the "getup and go" it's got right now, but I'm not a kid anymore, and don't really need it. Nor do I do alot of towing (but I may occasionally pull 5000 lbs or so, maybe 1-2x a year). So I'm thinking of putting in 3.55's or 3.73's. Any thoughts/ideas/suggestions? What kind of mileage increase would/should I see with this change for the 2 different ratios?

Also, I'm a contractor, so I occasionally have to pull into sloppy jobsites, and, this truck is a 1wd (why can't manufacturers just be honest about this?). Heck I got stuck on level damp grass with this thing (my own, arrrrghh). I'm fairly certain it's only an open differential, and I'm thinking that a locker would be the way to go over LS. I'm not looking to spend big bucks here, but for the ring, pinion and locker, I would say I could do about $600-$700 if necessary, installed myself. Which locker? What about expected ride quality? It's a 3/4 ton truck, so the ride is already harsh, which I don't mind in a truck, but I don't want something that's going to throw my rear end around in a turn or on an icy/snowy road. I like the idea of a manual locker, but I can't say I've seen anything reasonably priced along those lines, but would consider one if the price was right.

Thanks in advance for your help!

Jason

BTW, I would put new tires on with better traction, but the tires were brand-new (M+S street tires--don't recall brand)when I bought the truck 5 months ago, so I'll just wait on that. Even though my 150 has an open diff, the only time I got it stuck was when I took it sledding through some deep snow (she floated on the snow on my spare). I always kept good traction tires on the rear.
 

Last edited by jroehl; Apr 30, 2004 at 09:37 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2004 | 03:53 PM
  #2  
RTM's Avatar
RTM
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 38
From: Sunny Florida
I would go with the 3.55 set up unless you have an auto trans. The rpm difference will be from 4.11 to 3.55 as follow and will vary depend on tire size and final gear ratio. 4.11=3224rpm 3.73=2925 3.55=2784 I just used some number sto show the difference in rpm from one to the other. I have a 3.55 10.25 trac loc rear axle for sale in the classifieds.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2004 | 03:55 PM
  #3  
jroehl's Avatar
jroehl
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,473
Likes: 4
From: Lafayette, IN
I do have an auto tranny (e4od), and I ran the numbers through the calculators on various sites. I'm looking for experience, mileage, etc. I think the rear end is an 8.8", 31-spline, but I'm not positive, that's why I included the axle code.

Jason
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2004 | 04:16 PM
  #4  
RTM's Avatar
RTM
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 38
From: Sunny Florida
If you have an F250 you willnot have an 8.8 rear axle. it would never last under an F250 that is used like it could be used. They also never made an 8 lug 8.8. It would have to be from what I know 10.25. I am not sure if ford offered anything other than thew 10.25 rear axle in the F250 trucks. I believe earlier trucks like in the 70's had dana 60 rear axles. I do not know when ford switched. I believe ford did have a metric 8 lug unti for a while so that may be something to look out for.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2004 | 06:47 PM
  #5  
jroehl's Avatar
jroehl
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,473
Likes: 4
From: Lafayette, IN
You're right. Dunno where I got the idea that it was an 8.8. I dug out the manual, and the 35 code means it was 4.10 from the factory (open diff), and it's a HD model, so the ring is 10.25". So should I go 3.55 or 3.73? Detroit, ARB, PowerTrax?

Thanks,
Jason
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2004 | 08:47 PM
  #6  
RTM's Avatar
RTM
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 38
From: Sunny Florida
What size tire do you run? This will affect the final drive ratio as well. If stock tires are all you drive on then 3.55 wouldn't be bad but anything less than 4.11 will cause the motor to work harder when towing. If it was me I would go 3.55 because I do alot of highway driving. Detroit is the best set up, in my opinion anyways.
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2004 | 12:29 AM
  #7  
MustangGT221's Avatar
MustangGT221
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,947
Likes: 6
From: Topsfield, MA
Club FTE Gold Member
As for a locker, you cant put a locker in a daily driven truck without the tires chirping and possible axle damage. A locker forces the tires to be spun at the same speed. Some lockers will ratchet around the corner, but its very harsh and not really great for a DD. A limited slip is the way to go. It'll spin both tires in the mud, snow, etc etc. About the only time it won't spin both is when 1 is off the ground, or there is a very high torque difference between the two tires. You can find a good LS on ebay or a store. Do a search here for limited slips, Auburn, Eaton, etc etc..any of the locker/ls companies.
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2004 | 04:12 AM
  #8  
SoCalDesertRider's Avatar
SoCalDesertRider
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,959
Likes: 9
From: USA
Justin: I have a locker (Powertrax Lock Right) in my '92 F350, which is driven both on the street and off road. If I am easy with the gas pulling out of right hand turns, I don't get any tire chirping. How a locker behaves on the street depends on how you drive it. All automatic locking differentials (Detroit, LockRight, etc) differentiate wheel speed around corners by ratcheting teeth in the differential and it is not all that harsh once you get used to it, especially if you drive smoothly. I only hear and feel the ratcheting when making very tight turns, as in parking. It does make a clank that I can hear and feel when going from coasting to accelerating, but it's not that bad. Also, the new Powertrax NoSlip, along with the new Detroit Locker and Soft Locker are smoother and quieter than the old Detroit and LockRight, due to a spring cusioned engagement ring in the NoSlip and another mechanism that accomplishes the same thing in the Detroits. I do agree that a limited slip is quieter and smoother and better suited to street use than a locker, but lockers can and are used safely on the street every day (my neighbor also has an old Detroit in his truck and drives it every day).

Anyways, to get to the person posting the question... Jason, I know what you mean about the disappointment of having an open diff, my old Chevy 2wd dually was a peg leg and so was my F350 when I first got it. They both sucked in mud and sand, even the F350, which is 4wd. The LockRight definately made a big difference in the off road ability of the truck. It claws it's way through just about anything now when in 4wd and there are places that I go now in 2wd that used to require locking in the front hubs. The $325 I spent for the differential was well worth it.

As for the ratio change, here is my experience in changing the ratio on a truck somewhat similar to yours. I'm running 4.56 gears and 33" tires (~4.30 effective ratio) without overdrive (C6 trans), and yeah, I am spinning a few rpms at freeway speeds. With your 4.10 axle, stock tires and E4OD overdrive trans, you're not really spinning all that high rpms, by comparison. Anyways, I noticed an increase in gas mileage going from 3.55's to 4.56's because my truck is heavy (F350 Crew Cab 4x4) and my engine is small (351), so it was really working hard to get the heavy truck moving. The lower (numerically higher) gears took some of the stress off the engine and I don't spend as much time with my foot deep in the pedal as I used to, which saves gas. The only area where I lost mileage was when driving fast on the freeway unloaded, because I don't have overdrive. Mileage and power when driving in hilly areas or when loaded, and both, was better with the 4.56's. I'm happy with this combination, except for not having overdrive. A .78:1 overdrive ratio would put me right about 3.55 final gearing (3.35 effective, with tire size difference), which would be right where I was before I did the gear change, for freeway driving, which that truck was great for, as long as there were no hills to climb. With your 4.10 gears and overdrive, you're right about 3.20 final gearing, which should be plenty high for the freeway.

Since your truck is also on the heavy side, but not as heavy as mine, and your engine is also small and you do have overdrive, I doubt you will be saving much gas by going with the 3.55's unless you do alot of fast driving unloaded on the freeway or live in a relatively flat part of the country. I don't know that the small gas savings would justify the cost of doing the gear change. If it were me, and I was dead set on changing the gears, I would change them to 3.73, which is a nice balance between power and mileage, if running stock size tires. Of course I'm not sure it's really worth it to spend the money for such a small change...

One alternative to changing the gears, is to change to a slightly larger tire size. If you were to put 33" tires on the truck (285/75-16, I think is what is in metric), assuming your stock size is 235/85-16 (~31.5"), it would be similar to having ~3.90 gearing instead of 4.10 and would be cheaper than doing a gear change, if you wait untill you need to buy new tires anyways. That will lower your rpms a little and you will still have good power as well. I ran that combination on a truck I had and it worked good.

Anyways, hope that helps ya out some, or maybe just adds more confusion to the equation LOL. At least it's one more thing to mull over anways...

.
 

Last edited by SoCalDesertRider; May 1, 2004 at 04:31 AM.
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old May 1, 2004 | 08:16 AM
  #9  
jroehl's Avatar
jroehl
Thread Starter
|
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,473
Likes: 4
From: Lafayette, IN
Thanks for the help so far. I do have stock tires (235/85R16), and the RPM calculators tell me that's 1977 rpms @ 65 mph in OD (which is close enough to the 2000 my tach reads). A 3.55 would get that down to 1712 rpms, and I think a 3.73 would be around 1799. I would think that would HAVE to translate to SOME fuel savings, going from 10-11 right now to even 13 would be great, especially with where fuel prices are right now, and would probably pay for itself in less than a year. SoCal--you've never been to IN, have you? Someone on another site calls this section of the midwest, "the foothills of Mount Level" I doubt I'll be doing much roadtripping, either, so this truck would stay on the flat mostly.

Jason
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2004 | 11:35 AM
  #10  
MustangGT221's Avatar
MustangGT221
Post Fiend
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,947
Likes: 6
From: Topsfield, MA
Club FTE Gold Member
I know how the lockers work, I was just not getting into specifics to confuse people. MOST people do not find lockers pleasureable or acceptable on the street, which is why I said what I said. I didn't mean you physically can't, but it's very hard on tire wear and the axle. A limited slip would do better for a daily driver in comfort, and he doesn't really NEED a locker, as the aftermarket has some pretty tight limited slips. My auburn Ls/Locker (selectable) is very tight, it'll chirp tires sometimes without the locker engaged but it's still very smooth (it probably chirps cuz it's brand new).

There are tons of threads on locker vs limited slip....the search function comes in handy for that and I bet you can find a few if you look through the last 5-6 pages of this forum.
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2004 | 11:41 AM
  #11  
94F150-408's Avatar
94F150-408
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,483
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
When I put in 4.56's instead of 4.10's with the 35" tires, I went down about 3 MPG in my 4x4 F150. I would go with the 3.55's for your configuration, you should see a increase in mileage with those gears.

As for as lockers go. I would not go with a locker for 2wd and mostly street use. They have characteristics that are best described as less than friendly for street useage ie...The spinning of the inner tire( you will see increased tire wear), the slack between deaccel and acceleration, a yank under hard throttle in a turn, and a locker could definiatly get you in trouble on ice. I would stick with a limited slip, it should help out alot for your truck and muddy conditions.
 

Last edited by 94F150-408; May 1, 2004 at 11:45 AM.
Reply
Old May 1, 2004 | 01:33 PM
  #12  
SoCalDesertRider's Avatar
SoCalDesertRider
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,959
Likes: 9
From: USA
Jason, you're right, I've never been to IN. I'm used to driving a heavy truck with a small engine over hilly terrain and for that low gears are the answer, otherwise you spend alot of time with your foot on the floor and sucking up alot of gas. And Justin is right, a limited slip is smoother than a locker and lockers are not for everyone, but I happen to like mine and dont mind the little noises it makes. With a short wheelbase truck I can see where a rear locker could get squirelly, but on this long heavy truck, I haven't had any problems with it sending me skidding accross the road. I do have limited slips front and rear in the Bronco and the rear one is very mild, practically unnoticeable, on the street but both help alot off road.
v
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
natewoz
Offroad & 4x4
7
Dec 30, 2015 08:05 AM
roycec
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
14
Mar 9, 2015 09:28 AM
nojoke327
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
2
Jul 7, 2014 07:08 PM
351c
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
19
Dec 28, 2007 01:04 PM
garymake
Offroad & 4x4
14
Nov 29, 2003 08:53 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE