Notices
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series All Ford Ranger and Mazda B-Series models

Newbie questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 11:37 AM
  #1  
jmelong's Avatar
jmelong
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: TN
Newbie questions

I am new to this forum , and considering purchasing a new Ranger. Since my Ranger knowledge is somewhat limited, I am looking to the experts for some help. First, does anyone know when the Ranger is scheduled for a new model changeover, just as took place with the F150 in 2004.

Now with that out of the way, I have been looking at the 2004 4X2 models. Does the 3.0 with manual trans have enough power for everyday driving with limited trailer towing? Is the 4.0 worth the extra money? What other options would you want?

Thanks for your help.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 12:04 PM
  #2  
PSKSAM2's Avatar
PSKSAM2
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 940
Likes: 2
From: Morris Plains, NJ
Welcome to FTE!

I have a '98 3.0 Manual and a '98 4.0 Auto. I bought the 4.0 Auto to gain some more towing power. Both are 4x4.

Automatics have higher tow ratings than manuals in these trucks, from what I've read because Ford doesn't want you burning out the clutch and claiming you were towing within spec. If you are only towing something light, like 2 snowmobiles or motorcycles now and then, you should be alright. I am towing a 1500lb trailer with a 2500lb car on it, so I wanted the headroom. There is a link to the towing spec in the Technical Information thread at the top of the forum listing.

I am trying to sell my 3.0 Manual (because I don't need two trucks), but I drive it at least twice a week to run a little gas through it. I am always impressed at how peppy and fun it is to drive compared to the 4.0. Yeah, the 4.0 has more power in the end and will keep going past 80 up a hill if you need it, but that 3.0 has plenty of getting up to speed power when unweighted. I must admit though, I haven't tried towing with it.

-Jim
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 12:37 PM
  #3  
Rockledge's Avatar
Rockledge
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,748
Likes: 16
From: Connecticut
Welcome!

There is no "new Ranger" on the horizon. The Ranger is not going to be re-designed anytime soon. The current style will remain for another 3-4 years, at least.

As long as you keep the towable weight within specs, the '04 model you are looking at will pull just fine. However, IMO you'll want to make sure it has a "limited slip" rear axle with a lower gear ratio (3.73 or a 4.10).

You can find the tow/weight specs for the '04 Rangers here (page 123):

http://www.motorcraftservice.com/OGP.../04ranog3e.pdf
 

Last edited by Rockledge; Mar 15, 2004 at 12:40 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 01:58 PM
  #4  
98xlt4x4's Avatar
98xlt4x4
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 1
From: Hillsboro, OR
Haven't driven a 3.0, but I love my 4.0L with manual trans. It's fast around town too, no doubt about that, and I love passing uphills doing 75 in fifth gear. Yes the towing rating and gross combined weight rating are lower than with the automatic. The gross combined weight rating for my truck is 7000lbs, and I weighed myself when I moved last week and the truck and trailer combined was 8,800lbs. Truck was 5100 and the trailer was 3700. The trailer was really more because I had a LOT of tongue weight. It pulled pretty good but the higher gears give it a little workout. Mostly just have problems in first gear, but I did okay with a new clutch. What do you plan on towing?
The 3.0L would probably be fine, but realize that the mileage will not be impressive. Some people say that they get the same mileage as my 4.0L. I say if the mileage is the same, or even close, go bigger and have power to spare. My mechanic has owned Rangers for years, used to have 3.0's and liked them. His new one is a 4.0 and he said he'll never go back. Something to think about
Like Rockledge said, you'll want a limited slip axle too, especially with 2wd. Report back with what you decide to do.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2004 | 07:24 AM
  #5  
jmelong's Avatar
jmelong
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: TN
Thanks everyone for your input. After reading the responses, it seems that the 4.0 is worth the extra investment, and won't let me down when I need it. I want the 5 speed and 3.73 rear end, and that may be hard to find. I checked all the dealers in the Dallas/Ft worth area, and nobody has that combo. Maybe a special order is in my future. Thanks all.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2004 | 01:18 PM
  #6  
Lone_Ranger01's Avatar
Lone_Ranger01
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis region
4.0 is well worth the extra $$$ IMO. You get 50 extra horses with the 4.0!!! You can't buy 50 HP for the cost of the engine upgrade.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2004 | 05:20 PM
  #7  
Thumper47's Avatar
Thumper47
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Originally posted by jmelong
Thanks everyone for your input. After reading the responses, it seems that the 4.0 is worth the extra investment, and won't let me down when I need it. I want the 5 speed and 3.73 rear end, and that may be hard to find. I checked all the dealers in the Dallas/Ft worth area, and nobody has that combo. Maybe a special order is in my future. Thanks all.
About that rearend ratio; some FYI:

I have a 2002 extended cab 4X4 with 4.0L and manual 5-speed. (and yes, you want the 4.0L) Mileage is consistant 19mpg daily driving to work & back home, etc. Two lane roads, multiple traffic signals. Get 21+ mpg on straight Interstate/Freeway driving. Remember, that's with a 4X4 without any form of lock-out hubs or anything.
Now the kicker: I have a 4:10 "limited-slip" rear end!
If you intend on doing ANY towing, I'd advise the 4.10. My rpms never seem excessive for speed being traveled. And the gas mileage is fine, IMHO.

FWIW
Thumper47
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2004 | 06:36 PM
  #8  
98xlt4x4's Avatar
98xlt4x4
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 1
From: Hillsboro, OR
He's looking at a 2 wheel drive though. If it's the standard 2wd with smaller tires, the 3.73 should be fine, would probably be about the same as 4.10's with bigger tires. It it's an edge with bigger tires, go for 4.10.
I have a 4x4 with 31's and 3.73 gears, wishing I had 4.10's. I am REALLY wanting to put 32's on mine but refuse to, due to the gearing. So maybe you should go for the 4.10's if you plan on putting on bigger tires later (which you probably will)
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 08:50 AM
  #9  
Thumper47's Avatar
Thumper47
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 98xlt4x4
He's looking at a 2 wheel drive though. If it's the standard 2wd with smaller tires, the 3.73 should be fine, would probably be about the same as 4.10's with bigger tires. It it's an edge with bigger tires, go for 4.10.
I have a 4x4 with 31's and 3.73 gears, wishing I had 4.10's. I am REALLY wanting to put 32's on mine but refuse to, due to the gearing. So maybe you should go for the 4.10's if you plan on putting on bigger tires later (which you probably will)
Good Points to consider. Thanks.
Thumper47
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE