Notices
Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

Worthless Engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 16, 2004 | 09:51 PM
  #31  
150ford's Avatar
150ford
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,378
Likes: 3
From: nebraska
MJd I would have to agree with you I would replace my motor with a 300 six. I have had two of those also. agreat long lasting motor. Just my thoughts.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2004 | 09:57 PM
  #32  
150ford's Avatar
150ford
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,378
Likes: 3
From: nebraska
Just a note on my last post. The 302 in its final year of production was tweaked somewhat and got better mileage than the earlier 302s. Powerwise they were a little more to.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 12:34 AM
  #33  
FordLariat's Avatar
FordLariat
Posting Guru
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 1
From: pound
The plastic intake on the GM 3.8 was terrible, I don't know how many of them I have had to replace.
If we want to talk about completely worthless engines, let's talk about the Ford 2.9 FI V6. Those things are good for almost 1,000 miles in between rebuilds! I have had 5 of them, and only one of them ran. Maybe it's because that truck couldn't keep a transmission in it long enough to blow an engine. It's in league with the Chevy 2.8 V6.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 06:21 PM
  #34  
Saurian's Avatar
Saurian
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 3
From: Centerville, Iowa
What was the 2.9 in? I've never heard of it...
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 06:28 PM
  #35  
MJD's Avatar
MJD
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: South Dakota
Originally posted by 150ford
Just a note on my last post. The 302 in its final year of production was tweaked somewhat and got better mileage than the earlier 302s. Powerwise they were a little more to.
I have heard that before. I noticed that it had a better rating than earlier years when I looked at a Consumer's Report once. Also, the MAF system, which was used from 1994-96 was slightly better than the earlier system.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 07:49 PM
  #36  
MW95F250's Avatar
MW95F250
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
The worst engine is one that won't run.

Not to get off topic, I can deal with most auto engines, but the worst engines by far are Tecumsehs. I just don't see how they can continue to make such junk. The last good engine from them was the HH100. Everything else from them that I have worked on is pure crap. They are very simple in design, just their design does not work at all and doesn't hold up well.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 07:51 PM
  #37  
MJD's Avatar
MJD
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: South Dakota
The old Wisconson motors weren't the best either.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 08:10 PM
  #38  
MW95F250's Avatar
MW95F250
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
Finding parts for old Wisconsins is near impossible. I think the easiest engines to work on and the best overall engines are Briggs and Strattons.

Hondas may be more reliable, but for the money, Briggs are the way to go.

Kohler make some good engines too, I have a K-321 in my '69 JD 140, and its all original, still runs like new. Again the only problem is price of parts.

I have put many hours on Briggs engines, at least 2,000 on a 12 hp Briggs I/C in a Craftsman rider. My '99 JD GT-235 has a Briggs Vanguard 18hp V-twin, I've put about 8 or 900 hours on it with no trouble either. I have a White LT-12 that was given to me free, it has a Briggs I/C 12hp, it still runs great even though the tractor around it is falling apart, it probably has at least 1200 hours on it. I also have countless 3.5hp Briggs pushmowers that have been through heck, and have kept going. I have had a couple of Tec. powered 3.5's that ran ok when they actually ran.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-3

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 08:22 PM
  #39  
MJD's Avatar
MJD
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: South Dakota
There are a few Briggs & Stratton motors around the place that power various things. They have been pretty reliable. We also have a Kohler in a JD garden tiller, and it has had virtually no problems. The most reliable little motor that we have is probably the Honda, which is on a grain auger. It sits outside all of the time and still easily starts.
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 08:46 PM
  #40  
superdutyjoe's Avatar
superdutyjoe
Junior User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Midland
I know this one's off in left field but the small motor that impresses me is the opposed 4 that I have in my dune buggy out of a 1971 SuperBeetle. I thrash on that thing on the dunes all day, I take it through the woods, still drive it on the street and it hasn't died yet. It had 77,000mi on it when I took it out of the car, put my dual carb kit on it and it's held up to abuse I know it wasn't designed for, for a year now. I know this one's a carry over from the diesel discussion but another useless motor is the GM 5.7 through 6.5 Diesel engines. Where to begin? The 5.7 well that was better left as a gas, the 6.2 where was the power? The 6.5 maybe the cast crank, the lack of an intercooler, the faulty bosch injection system coupled to the indirect injection, the compression that was too high, along with the fact that it was over square (bore larger than the stroke) and the lack of power (carryover from the 6.2)
 
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 08:50 PM
  #41  
MJD's Avatar
MJD
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: South Dakota
We have a Spray Coupe with a Volkswagen and it was pretty good until the tranny or clutch went on it. I am not a fan of the pre-Dmax GM diesel engines either.
 
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 02:56 AM
  #42  
FordLariat's Avatar
FordLariat
Posting Guru
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 1
From: pound
Originally posted by Saurian
What was the 2.9 in? I've never heard of it...
It was the Fuel Injected version of the 2.8 V6, with f.i. it became the 2.9. My Rangers were 88 models, and they all had the stock 2.9 V6.
 
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 07:11 PM
  #43  
Fomoko1's Avatar
Fomoko1
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 97,649
Likes: 2,015
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally posted by FordLariat
It was the Fuel Injected version of the 2.8 V6, with f.i. it became the 2.9. My Rangers were 88 models, and they all had the stock 2.9 V6.
Is the 2.8 similar to 2.9 or are they different in design? I was wondering what I could replace the 2.8 in my 1984 Ranger 2.8 with, love to have 302 but too much to change to get it in there. I would like to stay away from computer controlled engine systems such as the 2.9 , so if I could find a motor/transmission from a non compter vehicle I would like it better. I don`t know of a 2.9 that had a carb, I take it that 2.9 were all f/i, am I rite?
 
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 10:30 PM
  #44  
tinkerinteenager's Avatar
tinkerinteenager
New User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
If the ford 2.9's aren't burning oil there's something wrong with them....... Most of the people I know don't have good luck with them. We have an 86 bronco with the 2.9 Not much power. Another friend has had to replace his heads. I've heard it said there isn't a single one on the road without a cracked head? And if they don't it's because it was replaced... is this true?
Many of the above mentioned engines people have been bashing I've seen perform very well. Especially the GM 305. My dad had one in his work van.... drove it daily, finally the oil pan rusted through at about 450k. That's when we parked it. The body was SHOT. But the engine never let him down. Went through about 5 trannies though. lol Anyway that's my 2cents about some personal experiences.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 02:16 AM
  #45  
FordLariat's Avatar
FordLariat
Posting Guru
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 1
From: pound
As far as I know, all of the 2.9s were FI. I went through my share of heads on the ones that I had, sure turned me against Rangers!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 AM.

story-0
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-2
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-7
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE