Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

Why do Chevy's get better mpg?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-22-2004, 06:17 AM
J. E. Ray's Avatar
J. E. Ray
J. E. Ray is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Why do Chevy's get better mpg?

My father in law and brother in law both own Z-71's x-cabs with the 5.3l. Both claim to average 17 or 18 city and 19 to 21 hwy.
I get 13 to 15.1 city and hwy.
I did'nt buy the truck to get good mpg. But hey I would at least like to get above 15 mpg.
 
  #2  
Old 02-22-2004, 07:57 AM
MJD's Avatar
MJD
MJD is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have noticed the same thing with older motors. My 302 gets worse mileage than many GM 350s do. Of course, when I say anything about that here, everybody thinks that there is something wrong with my motor, when everybody that I know gets the same mpg with their 302.
 
  #3  
Old 02-22-2004, 09:30 AM
78fordman's Avatar
78fordman
78fordman is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Jefferson, Iowa
Posts: 2,833
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
but when it comes time to tow with your 5.4, you will have a lot more torque. Ford motors have a lot more low end torque than the equivlent chevy. Would really can not have good low end torque and good milage, the best i have gotten with an engine with good low end torque, besides my 300, was 13 out of my 390. I have a 5.7 chebbie 2500, and that thing has no low end torque. Off the line it sucks, once you hit 3500 rpm then it takes off. Reminds me of a high winding rice burner.
 
  #4  
Old 02-22-2004, 10:10 AM
MJD's Avatar
MJD
MJD is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it a Vortec or TB? The Vortecs do not lug as well. I know some who pulls a 12,000 lb loaded 20' stock trailer with a 1/2 ton Chevy, 5.3l, and it does pretty well. I'm not saying that it would pull better than a 5.4, but it pulls well.
 
  #5  
Old 02-22-2004, 12:27 PM
FERacing66's Avatar
FERacing66
FERacing66 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Jackassville
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mjd, in all likeyhood you do have something wrong with you 302. if you saw towinbobs post he gets 19 going 60 in his 302. it is to general of stament to say that chevys in general get better mileage than fords. what does the 5.3L vortec get on the highway? the ford 5.4L gets about 19-20 on the highway i beleive.
 
  #6  
Old 02-22-2004, 12:56 PM
MJD's Avatar
MJD
MJD is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I have something wrong with my motor, then everyone that I know does too. I go 75 mph, not 60.
 
  #7  
Old 02-22-2004, 01:30 PM
vman's Avatar
vman
vman is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: brimfield township,OH
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 5.8 only gets 10mpg. I don't care what the conditions are. If fords have more torque, they should use less gas. Torque gets the load moving. I love my truck, but I had an 87 silverado4x4 350, auto w/4.10's and got 14 in town and 22 on the road and it would pull a builing down.
 
  #8  
Old 02-22-2004, 01:53 PM
Lectrocuted's Avatar
Lectrocuted
Lectrocuted is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
19-20 mpg! Try 10-15. My 5.4 is a gas hog.
 
  #9  
Old 02-22-2004, 01:54 PM
DeckedoutF150's Avatar
DeckedoutF150
DeckedoutF150 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hamilton, ohio
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
also chevys rear end gearing is differnt than fords till you get to a 3.73. chevy has a 3.42 and ford has a 3.55. that will effect the mialge a little as well
 
  #10  
Old 02-22-2004, 04:21 PM
MJD's Avatar
MJD
MJD is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My pickup was only available with a 3.08, 3.55 and 4.10 gear ratio. I think that I would make slightly better mileage with 3.73 instead of 3.55 ratio because it would probably be able to pull hills in cruise without shifting and would pull against the wind better. Part of the reason that 302s do not make very good mpg is because they struggle too much. 3.08s would literally be a nightmare in my pickup. 3.55 and 3.42 gear ratios are too high for a SB gas engine. The 3.73 gear ratio is perfect for a pickup like mine, but Ford did not offer it. The difference is small between 3.55 and 3.73, but it makes a big difference. If you have a stick-shift, it will add life to the clutch also. 3.55s are ok with a diesel, but thats about it.
 

Last edited by MJD; 02-22-2004 at 04:23 PM.
  #11  
Old 02-22-2004, 09:28 PM
Chris91GT's Avatar
Chris91GT
Chris91GT is offline
New User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just FYI, my 2002 5.3L 2wd Ext Cab Sierra SLE with 3.73s typically gets ~17mpg mixed driving. Lately doing short trips in damn cold weather I'm getting only 15mpg. Best I've ever seen is about 18mpg.

Definitely a little shy of bottom end grunt (ie, <2000rpm) and the tranny is garbage, but above 2000rpm on the open road it pulls my 8000lbs enclosed car trailer at 130kph (>80mph... assuming no headwind) and still gets 9mpg.

All said... I'm still trying to sell it to buy a 6L PSD F350... because... 9mpg is not 13mpg, and 325lb-ft is not 560.
 
  #12  
Old 02-22-2004, 09:36 PM
justdan's Avatar
justdan
justdan is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: western ky
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my observation is - for similar size motor, ford has more torque than a GM. torque needs fuel, just the way it is, even when not hauling anything.
 
  #13  
Old 02-22-2004, 09:51 PM
MW95F250's Avatar
MW95F250
MW95F250 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah, 3.55's are a waste in a truck the size of mine. It does fine pulling up to about 8000 pounds, but it still only gets 10-12 mpg. I have been playing around with a 3.73 or 4.10 swap in my mind, but nothing has sold me on it yet. It seems the 3.55's make it hard for my transmission to decide whether to stay in 4th or drop into 3rd in the 35mph zones around here. However, I have heard that 460's get the same mpg regardless of the gearing.
 

Last edited by MW95F250; 02-22-2004 at 09:53 PM.
  #14  
Old 02-22-2004, 09:51 PM
MountainHound's Avatar
MountainHound
MountainHound is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: On top of a big hill...
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Post mpg

I owned a 2001 Silverado 1500 ext cab Z71 with 5.3L and 4.10s and it only averaged 13/14 mpg. I talked to a few guys who had the same configuration GM 1500s and they would say they were getting 18/20 mpg...they are fibbing.


BTW-that truck towed just fine for a 1/2 ton. I revved high but you could maintain 65/70mpg with a 4000lb trailer on all but the longest grades.
 
  #15  
Old 02-22-2004, 10:25 PM
fordeverpower's Avatar
fordeverpower
fordeverpower is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: iowa
Posts: 3,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by justdan
my observation is - for similar size motor, ford has more torque than a GM. torque needs fuel, just the way it is, even when not hauling anything.
In carbed motors i don't know how torque affects gas mileage when its based of rpm and the cam eccentric. And i always here 302 owners complaining about gas mileage. most get around 12 from what i have heard. the gm high rpm power reminds me when i was driving a 350 chevy and in 2nd gear it couldn't get up a slight incline.
 


Quick Reply: Why do Chevy's get better mpg?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 AM.