Notices

Poor 352 is bleeding to death

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 25, 2004 | 02:04 PM
  #1  
tojoski's Avatar
tojoski
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
From: McRae, AR
Unhappy Poor 352 is bleeding to death

Hey guys,

you may or may not remember that i was in the process of installing a pro-jection fuel-injection system when i last posted.

well, that went fairly well and the results were impressive. now comes the bad news, looks as if ive got cracked rings on #6 and #7, probably happened when i fired it up after sitting for 3 1/2 years..

So now i am planning with a friend to build a mild 390 and here is my question for the Guru's: Do you think the 670 CFM Throttle body will be adequate for a 390 that we hope to make 350 - 400 HP?

any and all help is appreciated! thanks

Joe
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2004 | 02:06 PM
  #2  
Ratsmoker's Avatar
Ratsmoker
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,624
Likes: 8
From: Missouri
350 is a yes, 400 is a weak maybe IMHO. You will probably be pulling vacuum at higher RPMs.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2004 | 04:42 PM
  #3  
gtex's Avatar
gtex
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,175
Likes: 21
From: Texas
Shoot for a low RPM torque monster, and I think you'd be OK. Just try to keep away from parts that are designed to make power over ~5500 RPM.

Should make for smooth, torquey FE, that starts easy and get's almost decent mileage.

I thought about the Projection for my motor, but wimped out and stayed with a carb..With my cold start issues, I'm thinking fuel injection looks pretty good..
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2004 | 04:49 PM
  #4  
tojoski's Avatar
tojoski
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
From: McRae, AR
the projection setup really did work out well on my stock 352, even on the 2bbl original intake..

the problem i ran into was that through a bad transaction on ebay, it wound up being a costly venture.. i had to buy the fuel pump, and some other things

and still had an older analog computer that didnt have the 02 sensor input.. after much tuning it is almost impossible to get it running consistently smooth, my feelings are though that a newer digital computer with O2 sensor input would have performed much better..

i did get 12mpg on the highway pulling my boat though, given the opportunity to do it over again i would have bought a new setup right from jegs..

there are some pics in my gallery
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2004 | 04:54 PM
  #5  
Ratsmoker's Avatar
Ratsmoker
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,624
Likes: 8
From: Missouri
With an air cleaner on you can barely see a difference between it and a carb. I love carbs. That's just me but I do see the advantages of injection.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2004 | 10:48 AM
  #6  
Freightrain's Avatar
Freightrain
Lead Driver
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,893
Likes: 12
From: Ohio
Club FTE Silver Member

Heck I like carbs so much....I have two of them on most of my cars/trucks...

Fuel injection is nice, but seems they can be troublesome at times. Heck it was -5 Sunday morning and the old '67 352 kicked right off without a hitch. Seems a couple friends with new vehicles had trouble with theirs. Something about really cold weather and the computer just not able to adapt to it. Bummer. The old Holley had NO problems with it.

Larry
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2004 | 11:26 AM
  #7  
Annihilator's Avatar
Annihilator
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
As far as the whole "cost effective" issue goes a carb would be cheaper but on the other hand I suppose it is hard to beat modern technology although I will stick with a carb because I can work on it myself without expensive tools.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TEX001
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
34
Aug 9, 2020 07:44 AM
DrZoom
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
Jul 24, 2016 03:31 PM
Fellenz
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
23
Dec 8, 2014 04:51 PM
1975MudRat
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
38
Aug 29, 2013 02:52 PM
SuperDuty93
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
Apr 28, 2013 12:39 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE