Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

My overboost problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 02:08 PM
  #16  
CLPF350's Avatar
CLPF350
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Sebastopol, CA
My totally stock '04 F350 dually routinely maxes my boost gauge @ 30 psi. I drilled and tapped the aluminum elbow just behind the radiator.
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 04:17 PM
  #17  
mattsf250's Avatar
mattsf250
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 987
Likes: 3
From: Bass Lake, CA
which side??
before the intercooler, or after?
it makes a diff..... tap it just before the manifold to see what the engine actually gets. these trucks do not have very efficient intercoolers.
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 06:35 PM
  #18  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by mattsf250
which side??
before the intercooler, or after?
it makes a diff..... tap it just before the manifold to see what the engine actually gets. these trucks do not have very efficient intercoolers.

these trucks do not have very efficient intercoolers. How do we know this?
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 07:54 PM
  #19  
johndeer's Avatar
johndeer
Junior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Something I left out was evertime I have had a problem I have been pulling about 9 to 10,000 lbs. That is with overboost,blown intercoolers, and turbo hoses.
Just a thought if you needed a cat for back pressure,why is it only I think its 1999 and 2003 have cats?? Besides for the emissions.
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 08:36 PM
  #20  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by johndeer
Something I left out was evertime I have had a problem I have been pulling about 9 to 10,000 lbs. That is with overboost,blown intercoolers, and turbo hoses.
Just a thought if you needed a cat for back pressure,why is it only I think its 1999 and 2003 have cats?? Besides for the emissions.
That fact does make a difference...........under a load the motor is working allot harder.

You should still not have a problem.......
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 05:15 AM
  #21  
user 708242442's Avatar
user 708242442
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by johndeer
Something I left out was evertime I have had a problem I have been pulling about 9 to 10,000 lbs. That is with overboost,blown intercoolers, and turbo hoses.
Just a thought if you needed a cat for back pressure,why is it only I think its 1999 and 2003 have cats?? Besides for the emissions.
Two totally different motors you are talking about here.Not only does the cat give you preassure but so does the down pipe.Makes you wonder why Ford doesn't put 4" exhaust on from factory-maybe the turbo doesn't respond well?
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 06:52 AM
  #22  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by King Ranch
Two totally different motors you are talking about here.Not only does the cat give you preassure but so does the down pipe.Makes you wonder why Ford doesn't put 4" exhaust on from factory-maybe the turbo doesn't respond well?
That is exactlly why they don't........good call KingR
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 12:48 PM
  #23  
mattsf250's Avatar
mattsf250
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 987
Likes: 3
From: Bass Lake, CA
Originally Posted by Tim Lamkin
these trucks do not have very efficient intercoolers. How do we know this?
well, i do not have any graphs of the pressure drop over the core, however the fact that banks sells an upgrade intercooler, and not a turbo tells me the turbo is able to outflow the stock unit.

not to mention the 7.3 i/c is notibly poor, somehting on the order of 5-6 psi loss outgoing vs/ inlet boost pressure.
ford shoots for production/cost/packaging when they design. or order these from a manufacturer....flow losses are not a top priority.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 01:30 PM
  #24  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by mattsf250
well, i do not have any graphs of the pressure drop over the core, however the fact that banks sells an upgrade intercooler, and not a turbo tells me the turbo is able to outflow the stock unit.

not to mention the 7.3 i/c is notibly poor, somehting on the order of 5-6 psi loss outgoing vs/ inlet boost pressure.
ford shoots for production/cost/packaging when they design. or order these from a manufacturer....flow losses are not a top priority.

Agreed with your observation, however to say they are not efficient is..well just because Banks sells one does not mean they are inefficient. Ford is mass-produced and banks is for all intent purpose a one off copy, so absolutely you can build a better one. My point I think Fords is good…with as much HP as they are pulling then it is not bad…. simply massed produced. I would like to get the real engineering numbers along with the performance criteria they were shooting for.

Good stuff
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 07:49 PM
  #25  
keck.sc's Avatar
keck.sc
New User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
I am new but I must share

I just wanted to add my new experience with everyone. Just talked to the service department about my, 2003 4x4 CC F-350 Sonic Blue baby. And they said are putting in a new turbo. They did not say why yet but I took it in for them to investigate the engine light and loss of power. But what I want everyone to hear is this, my ONLY mod is a muffler deleat pip. And I am running a 1/03 build with no flashes Well till today
So I really don't think the after market exhaust is the problem or the flashes.
Like I said just my story love this site, it has been a great help Thanks Everyone
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2004 | 08:21 PM
  #26  
johndeer's Avatar
johndeer
Junior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
King ranch,
The reason ford doesn't put 4 inch, is because of cost. A turbo from the people I've talked to say the less back pressure the better. Back pressure does nothing for a turbo.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2004 | 09:00 PM
  #27  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by johndeer
King ranch,
The reason ford doesn't put 4 inch, is because of cost. A turbo from the people I've talked to say the less back pressure the better. Back pressure does nothing for a turbo.
Except this motor the 6.0L does require some back pressure. You are correct that most turboed motors do require little or no back pressure.


Turboed boy that word spells and reads weird!!
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 04:47 AM
  #28  
user 708242442's Avatar
user 708242442
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by johndeer
King ranch,
The reason ford doesn't put 4 inch, is because of cost. A turbo from the people I've talked to say the less back pressure the better. Back pressure does nothing for a turbo.
The 6.0 is the only diesel with a vairable vain turbo in it and yes it does like a little back preasure.Cost?You can get a 4" exhaust cheaper then the stock.
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 06:43 AM
  #29  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Ford, International, and a few of their closet friends probably spent millions designing this motor. They still have a little work to do, that notwithstanding if it would have needed 4 DP then they mighty have put one on. It is designed to run with a cat, for many reason. Not just sound and HP. A motor as designed to run in harmony with all its parts, each and every one.
They do not build these things and then start adding parts.
We as a group or individually cannot re-design this motor and out think Ford. This issue has been belated beyond any other. Those who choose to spend their money doing this mod do it with the full knowledge that it can affect you warranty.
One item that is of particular interest if you own a 6.0L
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 04:50 PM
  #30  
SBV45's Avatar
SBV45
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,483
Likes: 2
From: Central Texas
Originally Posted by Tim Lamkin
Ford, International, and a few of their closet friends probably spent millions designing this motor. They still have a little work to do, that notwithstanding if it would have needed 4 DP then they mighty have put one on. It is designed to run with a cat, for many reason. Not just sound and HP. A motor as designed to run in harmony with all its parts, each and every one.
They do not build these things and then start adding parts.
We as a group or individually cannot re-design this motor and out think Ford. This issue has been belated beyond any other. Those who choose to spend their money doing this mod do it with the full knowledge that it can affect you warranty.
One item that is of particular interest if you own a 6.0L

Closet friends??? Is that why there are nice interiors?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE