boxing frame rails

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jan 15, 2004 | 09:28 PM

paragary

Thread Starter

New User

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 5

Likes: 0

From: batesville us

boxing frame rails

I am starting a 1954 f-100. This is my first Project vehicle. I have the entire truck disdassembled and ready to work on the suspension. I was interested in boxing the frame rails and was curious about 3/16 " vs. 1/4" steel. I will be installing the industrial chassis dakota crossmember. any assistance will be a big help

Jan 15, 2004 | 10:03 PM

joners

Elder User

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 850

Likes: 0

From: Winnipeg Canada

My frame was boxed with 3/16" steel. Boxed from front to back.

Jan 16, 2004 | 07:32 AM

GreatNorthWoods

Lead Driver

Joined: Apr 2002

Posts: 8,813

Likes: 13

From: Littleton, New Hampshire

Use the 3/16ths as you will find it's much easier to work with than the thicker stuff. When I installed the Chrysler torsion bar suspension under my F-3, I boxed it using 1/8 inch because it was easier to cut with my limited tools. It seems plenty stong enough, but 3/16ths is probably better.

Jan 16, 2004 | 07:50 AM

ferguson777

Posting Guru

Joined: Apr 2002

Posts: 2,244

Likes: 1

On my 54, I used 3/16 on the rear section where I had to reinforce after C notching the frame. On the front I used 1/8.

Can't really remember why I used only 1/8th on the front, but my reason was really good at the time.

I personally would think that 1/4 inch would be overkill. Either 3/16 or 1/8 should be fine.

If you're going with the "Volare" IFS, then wait until it's attached before you box the frame as some of the boxing gets welded to the new suspension member.

Later,

Jan 16, 2004 | 08:21 AM

DS02F250

Posting Guru

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 2,440

Likes: 0

From: Ventura County, CA

ParaGary,

I put an IC crossmember and a '88 Dodge Dakota IFS on my '59 F-100, so if I can answer any questions, please don't hesitate. Also, if you want to, you can view my link (click on "view users gallery" on one of my posts). It has a lot of pix about the install. E-mail me off-line (click on "profile" on one of my posts) so we don't use up too much FTE space.

Congrats on your first project truck!

Jan 16, 2004 | 08:22 AM

jniolon

old and in the way

Joined: Jul 1997

Posts: 5,925

Likes: 1,053

From: Lovely Hueytown Alabama

boxing

Cuz,

your tag line cracks me up ...but maybe you should add "yet" !!!

paragary... 1/8" to 3/16" is gracious plenty... 1/4 is only adding weight... back to the front cab mounts... Joners is just showing off with his full frame box

john

BTW group... right now ...somewhere in America in that big old brown truck... is ridiing my new Ididit shiny tilt column... (I hope)

Last edited by jniolon; Jan 16, 2004 at 08:25 AM.

Jan 16, 2004 | 02:21 PM

fatfenders

Post Fiend

Joined: Feb 2001

Posts: 6,328

Likes: 124

From: Iowa

"Can't really remember why I used only 1/8th on the front, but my reason was really good at the time."

I think me, Cuz and a few others were arguing/discussing this one a while back. I think 1/8 is plenty, 3/16 won't hurt nothing, 1/4 is ballast. No sense heating up the frame more than necessary.

Full frame box is not necessary either. It will take out the flex that Ford engineered into your C-channeled frame. Will Joners frame spontaneously tear in half because he has a full frame box? Somehow I doubt that.

Good to hear your steering box is finally enroute.