Non-Nuclear Free-Falling Airdropped Munitions
#1
Non-Nuclear Free-Falling Airdropped Munitions
Ok someone started a thread on cartridges, now let’s talk bombs. Personally I go for, again, the bigger the better theory. Of course I don’t want mass nuclear fallout, at least not in my neighborhood. Personally there are several bombs that I prefer. The first being the BLU-82 “Daisy Cutter”. Introduced in March of 1970 as a field expedient method for carving out helicopter landing zones in the jungles of Vietnam (known as Commando vault airlift operations), the 15,000-pound BLU-82B, more popularly known as the "Daisy Cutter", is arguably the world's largest non-nuclear conventional airdropped munition. The BLU-82 is filled with 12,600 pounds of GSX explosive slurry and when detonated creates a blast wave of over 1,000 lbs. per square inch, which is sufficient to shear an 8" diameter tree off at its base and clear an area approxiamately 260 feet in diameter.
My second choice is the CBU-87 Combined Effects Munition (CEM) cluster bomb. The CBU-87 CEM comprises the SUU-64/B Tactical Munitions Dispenser (TMD), the FZU-39 proximity fuse, and BLU-97/B Combined Effect Bomb (CEB) sub-munitions. With a payload of 202 BLU-97/B sub-munitions and depending in the rotation of the deployment device and altitude of release the area of coverage can range from 70x70 feet to 800x400 feet.
And finally comes the BLU-113 Penetrator “Bunker Buster” The GBU-28 is a 5,000-pound laser-guided conventional munition that uses a 4,400-pound penetrating warhead. The bombs are modified Army artillery tubes, weigh 4,637 pounds, and contain 630 pounds of high explosives. The BLU-113 can penetrate over 100 feet underground and 20 feet of hardened concrete. I like this bomb because it shows America’s ingenuity and creativeness. During the first Gulf War the official go-ahead for the project was given on February 14th and the first 2 operational units were delivered in theater on February 27th.
What are everyone’s favorite non-nuclear free-falling airdropped munitions, or bombs for short?
Signed,
The Don
My second choice is the CBU-87 Combined Effects Munition (CEM) cluster bomb. The CBU-87 CEM comprises the SUU-64/B Tactical Munitions Dispenser (TMD), the FZU-39 proximity fuse, and BLU-97/B Combined Effect Bomb (CEB) sub-munitions. With a payload of 202 BLU-97/B sub-munitions and depending in the rotation of the deployment device and altitude of release the area of coverage can range from 70x70 feet to 800x400 feet.
And finally comes the BLU-113 Penetrator “Bunker Buster” The GBU-28 is a 5,000-pound laser-guided conventional munition that uses a 4,400-pound penetrating warhead. The bombs are modified Army artillery tubes, weigh 4,637 pounds, and contain 630 pounds of high explosives. The BLU-113 can penetrate over 100 feet underground and 20 feet of hardened concrete. I like this bomb because it shows America’s ingenuity and creativeness. During the first Gulf War the official go-ahead for the project was given on February 14th and the first 2 operational units were delivered in theater on February 27th.
What are everyone’s favorite non-nuclear free-falling airdropped munitions, or bombs for short?
Signed,
The Don
#4
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Originally posted by The Don
I firmly believe in a first strike policy, yes. And in answer to your question.....I like SAM’s and SSM’s as well.
Signed,
The Don
PS
Speaking of first strike policy, what is everyones thoughts on that? For it or against and why?
I firmly believe in a first strike policy, yes. And in answer to your question.....I like SAM’s and SSM’s as well.
Signed,
The Don
PS
Speaking of first strike policy, what is everyones thoughts on that? For it or against and why?
You're in a bar, and there's some scumbag who's generally bothering everybody. You have two options: walk up to him and hit him in the face (unprovoked) or wait until he gives you a good reason to hit him.
Now with Iraq - Saddam Hussein is an evil person. Nobody will argue that. He never did anyone any favors and the Iraqi people are better off without him.
BUT - who are we to say it's time for him to go? The United States is one country of many occupying the planet Earth. We may be the unnofficial spokesperson for almost everyone else, but we should have waited until Saddam gave us a very good reason to go in there and stomp him. That way, everyone would be on our side and things would've gone a bit smoother.
Instead, we went in, blew up a bunch of stuff, killed a bunch of people, and found that Iraq was essentially a chuhahua (sp?) - a nasty little dog that makes a lot of racket but doesn't threaten anybody.
It's like watching a grown man beat up a bunch of 5th graders - kind of embarassing.
That said, what's done is done, so now we've got to finish the job.
XXL
#12
Good reason
Originally posted by BigMattXXL
I don't agree with first strike policies. Think about it this way:
You're in a bar, and there's some scumbag who's generally bothering everybody. You have two options: walk up to him and hit him in the face (unprovoked) or wait until he gives you a good reason to hit him.
I don't agree with first strike policies. Think about it this way:
You're in a bar, and there's some scumbag who's generally bothering everybody. You have two options: walk up to him and hit him in the face (unprovoked) or wait until he gives you a good reason to hit him.
#13
Re: Good reason
Originally posted by pchristman
Depends upon what the meaning of "bothering" is. If he's calling people names, consider the source. If he's hitting, stabbing, shooting, poisoning, butchering, raping, etc., go hide and call 911. Unless you're an American, with a reputation for helping poor downtrodden folks - then you kick his ***.
Depends upon what the meaning of "bothering" is. If he's calling people names, consider the source. If he's hitting, stabbing, shooting, poisoning, butchering, raping, etc., go hide and call 911. Unless you're an American, with a reputation for helping poor downtrodden folks - then you kick his ***.
Later Larry
#14
Re: Good reason
Originally posted by pchristman
Depends upon what the meaning of "bothering" is. If he's calling people names, consider the source. If he's hitting, stabbing, shooting, poisoning, butchering, raping, etc., go hide and call 911. Unless you're an American, with a reputation for helping poor downtrodden folks - then you kick his ***.
Depends upon what the meaning of "bothering" is. If he's calling people names, consider the source. If he's hitting, stabbing, shooting, poisoning, butchering, raping, etc., go hide and call 911. Unless you're an American, with a reputation for helping poor downtrodden folks - then you kick his ***.
We're so busy worrying about everyone else's problems that we're not doing anything at home.
We can spend $87 billion on a country that hates us yet they're slashing funding to my school so my tuition goes up every semester?
We send millions of dollars worth of AIDS cocktails to every other country on the planet. Great. Now tell me again, how many Americans don't have healthcare?
I understand that the rest of the world looks to us for help, but sheesh, don't you think we could help ourselves a bit more? Giving to charity's one thing; giving everything you've got to charity and ending up homeless is another.
I could go on but it's making me angry
Nothing personal Pchristman; this rant isn't directed at anybody. It's just a sequence of thoughts that bother me quite a bit.
XXL
Last edited by BigMattXXL; 01-15-2004 at 01:05 PM.