Men on Mars!
#1
#2
#4
Honestly, I don't think we're even close to tranporting humans to Mars. It was quite a feat landing an unmanned rover on a planet a couple of million miles away. The biggest obstacle as I see it, is getting the spacecraft back home again. Once you start putting humans on board, you need to be sure beyond all doubt.
#5
The humans volunteering for this duty would, I'm sure, accept the risks involved. If I wasn't a family man, I'd prbably toss my name in the hat. (of course they probably wouldn't accept my application, being an old ford truck drivin hick) Sounds like an opportunity in history that would be hard to pass up for some.
I believe that I heard that they were going to use the same technology as the lunar ship to return to earth on. Just larger fuel cells and such. Pretty exciting I think! I agree, lets go!
I believe that I heard that they were going to use the same technology as the lunar ship to return to earth on. Just larger fuel cells and such. Pretty exciting I think! I agree, lets go!
#6
The difference between machines and man is man will adapt to different situations and adapt. Machines can only follow their programme. If we send men and ladies to Mars they would be able to notice a program glitch and/or decide to choose a different site to land at. Or decide it would not work due to problems with equipment and turn back.
#7
I personally see no reason to go. We have such a deficit right no that we cant afford it. The estimates with the first Bush was a consetvative $400 Billion and as high as $1 Trillion. No way we can afford it unless something is done to quiet wasting tax money so it can be alloted to NASA.
Trending Topics
#8
I'm all for sending a manned space flight to Mars,but there are so many programs that are underfunded at this time I dont see how we could fund such a program at this time .by funding such programs such as a manned flight,I think NASA would be stretched a little thin.if somehow NASA could accuire additional funding,I'd say go for it.I dont think they have the bugs out of the shuttle program yet.
#9
Originally posted by theshyguy
I personally see no reason to go. We have such a deficit right no that we cant afford it. The estimates with the first Bush was a consetvative $400 Billion and as high as $1 Trillion. No way we can afford it unless something is done to quiet wasting tax money so it can be alloted to NASA.
I personally see no reason to go. We have such a deficit right no that we cant afford it. The estimates with the first Bush was a consetvative $400 Billion and as high as $1 Trillion. No way we can afford it unless something is done to quiet wasting tax money so it can be alloted to NASA.
#11
If Mars' gravity is about the same as ours then it seems logical that it would take a similiar vehicle to escape it. Not an impossible task, but the logistics of it seem staggering. It seems we would have to send a bunch of loads ahead so they could put together a vehicle that would have enough poop to get them out.
#14
"Oh dear, now I shall have to create more Martians."
"At last, after two thousand years of work, the Illudium PU-36 Explosive Space Modulator."
"Brace yourself for immediate disintegration."
--Marvin The Martian
The single biggest reason to Invade Mars. It's not only our freedom, livelihood, or humanity that is at stake, gentlemen (used loosely of course), but the fate of the Entire Planet!!!
How much longer can we let this threat go on without direct, swift and final erradication of these terrorists of the solar system?? To Arms!!!
On a less serious note, I'm all for the space exploration programs. I think it was 2008 that they are projecting the launch for Mars, give or take a few years. Another manned trip to the moon is supposedly sooner. The way I see it, we need to get an established base of operations on the moon for any real missions beyond our planet's direct arena to have any chance of success. Time to get that Space Elevator project going, I gather. Or something even more suitable for the task, with technological advances doing as they are. Whether it be to defray the public opinion away from the troubles of this world or not, I'm happy to see the media putting these subjects back on the plates of the American households. To me,, this is one of those "Big Picture" issues that will eventually save or destroy our race. That decision, I'm sure, will be up to some @$&^$@* politician that can't even see past his nose,,,, but I still hope.
"At last, after two thousand years of work, the Illudium PU-36 Explosive Space Modulator."
"Brace yourself for immediate disintegration."
--Marvin The Martian
The single biggest reason to Invade Mars. It's not only our freedom, livelihood, or humanity that is at stake, gentlemen (used loosely of course), but the fate of the Entire Planet!!!
How much longer can we let this threat go on without direct, swift and final erradication of these terrorists of the solar system?? To Arms!!!
On a less serious note, I'm all for the space exploration programs. I think it was 2008 that they are projecting the launch for Mars, give or take a few years. Another manned trip to the moon is supposedly sooner. The way I see it, we need to get an established base of operations on the moon for any real missions beyond our planet's direct arena to have any chance of success. Time to get that Space Elevator project going, I gather. Or something even more suitable for the task, with technological advances doing as they are. Whether it be to defray the public opinion away from the troubles of this world or not, I'm happy to see the media putting these subjects back on the plates of the American households. To me,, this is one of those "Big Picture" issues that will eventually save or destroy our race. That decision, I'm sure, will be up to some @$&^$@* politician that can't even see past his nose,,,, but I still hope.