Notices

Dothrottle body spacers work

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2004 | 02:17 PM
  #1  
4.2flybyu's Avatar
4.2flybyu
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Question Dothrottle body spacers work

I have 99 ford f-150 4.2 V6 and i was looking into a Throttle body spacer. I wanted more power and better gas milage. Does anyone have one that has worked good for them? Thanks
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2004 | 02:23 PM
  #2  
true4.2's Avatar
true4.2
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,310
Likes: 0
From: Lufkin
4.2flybyu:

First and foremost, Welcome To FTE!

This is a general opinion of TB Spacers...

On a different site I am on I actually looked at a dyno sheet of a user who dyno'd with and without the spacer. When the spacer was on he lost 5 rwhp. IMO, they aren't worth the money. Most of the people I have talked to consider them a waste of money...better off a doorstop than an engine piece.

Secondly, the spacer claims to add more power by swirling the air into the engine. I haven't actually seen that happen on paper yet. Also, you have to think of it like this - the shortest distance between 2 objects is a straight line. In other words the faster and quicker the air gets into the engine, the more power you are going to get. The spacer actually adds more distance for the air to travel to get to the engine. This is my opinion based on what I've seen. You are better off getting an Intake for about $30 more...which WILL get you more power for sure. I hope this helps.
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2004 | 08:56 PM
  #3  
horizonhuskies's Avatar
horizonhuskies
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale Az is home, St
I think the whole TB Spacer falls into the same category as exhaust and intakes. By itself, it will lose power, but in conjuction with other modifications, like intakes and exhaust, it can help.

Im no expert, but with my intake exhaust, etc. and TB Spacer, I have way more power, AND still got 19 MPG on my 1800 mile trip last week. I dont have any proof that it helps or hurts, so this is all IMHO.

I think Toms postings of how true duals can actually lose you RWHP without a counterbalance on the other side of the flywheel pertain to this item. Same thing with headers...they lose HP if you just stick them on with no other mods. Just a thought.

Garrett
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 12:54 AM
  #4  
V6Mustang's Avatar
V6Mustang
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
I've seen before/after dyno's of cars who have added TB spacers as well as intake spacers. Some will gain a couple HP to the wheels and some will lose a couple HP to the wheels. But I'm only talking about 2-3hp. Dyno's are not perfect...you could run the same car on one multiple times without changing anything and still get 2-3hp difference. So from what I've seen a TB spacer by itself won't add anything.
Dual exhaust by itself does for a fact give you more HP...as will an intake. An engine is an air pump, the faster you can move air through it the more power it will make. Your thinking is right though, a better flowing exhaust without something on the intake side to flow better will result in a loss of backpressure. Backpressure=Torque. You'll gain the horsepower up on the top end, but you'll lose a little torque down low, but with a near stock engine we're only talking single digit gains/losses here.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 07:35 AM
  #5  
Jimmy Dean's Avatar
Jimmy Dean
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
From: La Tech University, La
No, a duel setup on our trucks by itself hurts the motor, no back pressure. It will help out a V-8, but not a 6. we need SOME back pressure, which the duals by itself we cannot get any.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 09:35 AM
  #6  
true4.2's Avatar
true4.2
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,310
Likes: 0
From: Lufkin
Yea, I think the TB Spacer is going to pretty much be a mixed review. With the right conditions and component system you could see a few small gains with it. If you are just buying the spacer, don't waste your money. There's no way you could tell the difference from just that. Like Garrett said, get a intake, exhaust and the spacer and you'll probably notice a bit more of a difference.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 01:01 PM
  #7  
horizonhuskies's Avatar
horizonhuskies
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale Az is home, St
I just remember hearsay. Tom was told by his local shop that he would dyno less RWHP with true duals. Like I said, hearsay, but it makes sense to me..no backperssure could cause a styock engine to lose dynoed RWHP. Dunno, IMHO.

Garrett
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 01:19 PM
  #8  
sigma's Avatar
sigma
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
I’m with V6Mustang on the true duals. Back pressure is NEVER desirable. For high-performance purposes, backpressure in an exhaust system increases engine pumping-losses and decreases available engine power. Maximum mid-to-high RPM power will be always be achieved with the lowest possible backpressure
IMO the whole “engines require backpressure" thing is a myth.

An engine needs the highest flow velocity possible (intake and exhaust) at any given RPM for quick throttle response and torque. The problem stems from the fact that the flows are dramatically different across the RPM range. A small diameter exhaust pipe might give you maximum unimpeded gas velocity at 2000 RPM. This would give you great off-idle acceleration, but after 2000 RPM the exhaust gas volume begins to exceed the amount that can flow unimpeded through the pipe and you have BACK PRESSURE. To overcome the limitations of the undersized exhaust pipe your engine needs to literally pump the exhaust out the end of the pipe. This seriously inhibits peak performance for any number of reasons.

If we install a larger diameter exhaust pipe, we now have enough pipe volume to flow the unimpeded gas velocity at mid-to-high RPM without BACK PRESSURE. However, at lower RPM’s the gas volume is not large enough to maintain the flow velocity in the larger pipe and low-end throttle response suffers.

Exhaust systems are a compromise, you can maximize for low-range and mid-range performance or mid-range and high-end performance but you cannot simultaneously maximize for all three because of the differences in flow volume and velocity.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 01:28 PM
  #9  
Jimmy Dean's Avatar
Jimmy Dean
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
From: La Tech University, La
Run a motor without back pressure. and please do not complain when you burn your valves
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 01:38 PM
  #10  
sigma's Avatar
sigma
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
I have not read or heard anything to indicate that risk and the trucks at 105,000 and runs like a top. Why do you think less back pressure would cause a burnt valve?
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 01:49 PM
  #11  
Jimmy Dean's Avatar
Jimmy Dean
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
From: La Tech University, La
The hot exhaust does not exit properly, burns your exaust and intake valves back in the motor, do not remember the whole specifics of it though.....or maybe it was that it leaves to rapidly or somesuch, do not remember exactly right now....gotta locate a friend to get the whole scoop again....and yes I have seen it happen and know what it was due to, being as we had just changed the exhaust with what was thought would be a better flowing on,e well apparantly it flowed to much.
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 02:40 PM
  #12  
true4.2's Avatar
true4.2
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,310
Likes: 0
From: Lufkin
Well that's an entirely different discussion and thread alltogether. Back to the TB Spacers. 4.2flybyeu, do you have a final verdict?
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 03:57 PM
  #13  
horizonhuskies's Avatar
horizonhuskies
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale Az is home, St
Originally posted by sigma
I’m with V6Mustang on the true duals. Back pressure is NEVER desirable. For high-performance purposes, backpressure in an exhaust system increases engine pumping-losses and decreases available engine power. Maximum mid-to-high RPM power will be always be achieved with the lowest possible backpressure
IMO the whole “engines require backpressure" thing is a myth.
I agree with what you say, but it is completely irrelevant to the original statement.

You are talking hi-performance, as you mentioned in your second sentance, is not what we are talking about. We are strictly talking about putting a true dual setup on a BONE STOCK 4.2L. So, yes, in hi-performance cases, you are correct. But, IMHO, I disagree that having little to no backpressure with nothing forcing, or letting in, more air is a good thing.

v/r,
Garrett
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 07:41 PM
  #14  
4.2flybyu's Avatar
4.2flybyu
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Hey thanks guys i think ill just go with an intake becuase i havent heard much possitive results on the TB spacer.
thanks
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 09:24 PM
  #15  
true4.2's Avatar
true4.2
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,310
Likes: 0
From: Lufkin
No problem! Here's a link for a couple to get you started!

www.motorhaven.com
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE