Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

6.0L powerstroke

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2003 | 01:44 PM
  #1  
03250stroke's Avatar
03250stroke
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
6.0L powerstroke

Which exhaust performs the best?
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2004 | 08:24 AM
  #2  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Re: 6.0L powerstroke

Originally posted by 03250stroke
Which exhaust performs the best?
Do a search on exhaust; you will come up with a good number of post to read through.
I hope that you will find an answer.
Good luck.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2004 | 10:25 AM
  #3  
SBV45's Avatar
SBV45
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,483
Likes: 2
From: Central Texas
Make sure you read your warranty thoroghly. Some dealers won't say much on mods but if someone wants to be sticky, exhaust mods can be used to deny warranty.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2004 | 10:29 AM
  #4  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally posted by SBV45
Make sure you read your warranty thoroghly. Some dealers won't say much on mods but if someone wants to be sticky, exhaust mods can be used to deny warranty.
My understanding is if you go from CAT back only it will not affect your warranty EXCEPT for the part you actually replaced.

i.e. only the new parts. if you do the DP YES it can cause problems with the warranty.

Any and all other info on this would be great
thansk SBV45......we might learn some more on this
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2004 | 10:44 AM
  #5  
SBV45's Avatar
SBV45
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,483
Likes: 2
From: Central Texas
I was "RTFM" on the Premium Extended Service Plan that Ford gave me for complaining about the loss of mileage incurred with the Oct flash and subsequent expense of 20% loss of fuel economy for several months until they could fix their mistake.

Under things not covered it mentions lots of mods. I'll dig into the standard warranty and see if the same things like "unreasonable use (including driving over curbs, overloading,....)" and "ii)tampering with the vehicle, tampering with the emissions systems or with the other parts that affect these system (as for example, but not limited to exhaust and intake systems)" It further mentions lift kits, oversized tires, roll bars, cellular phones, alarm systems, automatic starting systems and performance-enhancing powertrain components.

Driving over a curb??? Mine is a 4x4.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2004 | 10:49 AM
  #6  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally posted by SBV45
I was "RTFM" on the Premium Extended Service Plan that Ford gave me for complaining about the loss of mileage incurred with the Oct flash and subsequent expense of 20% loss of fuel economy for several months until they could fix their mistake.

Under things not covered it mentions lots of mods. I'll dig into the standard warranty and see if the same things like "unreasonable use (including driving over curbs, overloading,....)" and "ii)tampering with the vehicle, tampering with the emissions systems or with the other parts that affect these system (as for example, but not limited to exhaust and intake systems)" It further mentions lift kits, oversized tires, roll bars, cellular phones, alarm systems, automatic starting systems and performance-enhancing powertrain components.

Driving over a curb??? Mine is a 4x4.
You have to wonder why they build a 4X4 curbs are very docile...........compared to...well just about anything. Wonder if it was/is some legal wrangling because of a past situation???
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2004 | 10:59 AM
  #7  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
What is "RTFM" forgot to ask
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2004 | 11:03 AM
  #8  
SBV45's Avatar
SBV45
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,483
Likes: 2
From: Central Texas
I just read the "Warranty Guide" provided when I bought the vehicle. Same sort of verbage but not as detailed as the Extended Plan guide. Still mentions curbs, overloading, etc. It specifically mentions chips.

I think they use this verbage because someone went rock climbing with their 4x4 and swore they ran over a curb. So be careful, all you forum folks, when you post about blowing the doors off some Chebby driver that you just voided your warranty if something bad happened when you did it.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Jan 1, 2004 | 11:07 AM
  #9  
f250mike's Avatar
f250mike
New User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach
SBV45

Look up the "Magnuson-Moss Act".

In short, (based on my research) it is a violation of federal law for a dealer to "void" your warranty just because you used aftermarket products UNLESS the aftermarket product you used is the actual cause of the failure.


FTC regulations state:

“(c) No warrantor of a consumer product may condition his written or implied warranty of such product on the consumer’s using, in connection with such product, any article or service (other than article or service provided without charge under the terms of the warranty) which is identified by brand, trade, or corporate name; except that the prohibition of this subsection may be waived by the Commission if – ((1)the warrantor satisfies the Commission that the warranted product will function properly only if the article or service so identified is used in connection with the warranted product, and (2) the Commission finds that such a waiver is in the public interest.” ((42 U.S.C.2302(C))

For me, I don't have any problem installing an aftermarket intake or even a turbo-back exhaust but I'm uncomfortable installing a chip. It seems (to me) that I'm taking a little bit bigger risk by installing a product like a high performance chip than by improving the existing airflow with an intake/exhaust.

You should research this act, evaluate the mod you want to make and then decide on the benefits of the mod vs. the risk involed and then decide if you want go ahead with the mod.

Just my .02 cents.
Good luck.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2004 | 11:41 AM
  #10  
ssls6's Avatar
ssls6
More Turbo
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 534
Likes: 168
From: Park County, CO
Don't forget that the "burden of proof" lies with the consumer. That means a dealer could say no to a warranty claim and it is up to us to prove the answer should have been yes. It would be better for consumers if this was not true but it is not practical for Ford to test every gagdet that comes along.

I know guys that believe the aftermarket suppliers will bear the burden of proof. I for one, don't believe that for a minute. I just can't see a small independent business owner filing a lawsuit against Ford on my behalf? It is my right to sue the aftermarket supplier for compensation, but again, I have the burden of proof.

Lastly, I have been to websites where the aftermarket supplier quotes Moss-Ferguson as a way to make us feel better. They say things like "Ford cannot deny you coverage, blah blah blah". Keep in mind that Ford can always deny you coverage, the question is "can you prove that they were wrong doing so?".
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2004 | 11:44 AM
  #11  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally posted by ssls6
Don't forget that the "burden of proof" lies with the consumer. That means a dealer could say no to a warranty claim and it is up to us to prove the answer should have been yes. It would be better for consumers if this was not true but it is not practical for Ford to test every gagdet that comes along.

I know guys that believe the aftermarket suppliers will bear the burden of proof. I for one, don't believe that for a minute. I just can't see a small independent business owner filing a lawsuit against Ford on my behalf? It is my right to sue the aftermarket supplier for compensation, but again, I have the burden of proof.

Lastly, I have been to websites where the aftermarket supplier quotes Moss-Ferguson as a way to make us feel better. They say things like "Ford cannot deny you coverage, blah blah blah". Keep in mind that Ford can always deny you coverage, the question is "can you prove that they were wrong doing so?".
Very good point~~~~!!!!
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2004 | 11:53 AM
  #12  
SBV45's Avatar
SBV45
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,483
Likes: 2
From: Central Texas
Originally posted by f250mike
SBV45

Look up the "Magnuson-Moss Act".

In short, (based on my research) it is a violation of federal law for a dealer to "void" your warranty just because you used aftermarket products UNLESS the aftermarket product you used is the actual cause of the failure.


FTC regulations state:

“(c) No warrantor of a consumer product may condition his written or implied warranty of such product on the consumer’s using, in connection with such product, any article or service (other than article or service provided without charge under the terms of the warranty) which is identified by brand, trade, or corporate name; except that the prohibition of this subsection may be waived by the Commission if – ((1)the warrantor satisfies the Commission that the warranted product will function properly only if the article or service so identified is used in connection with the warranted product, and (2) the Commission finds that such a waiver is in the public interest.” ((42 U.S.C.2302(C))

For me, I don't have any problem installing an aftermarket intake or even a turbo-back exhaust but I'm uncomfortable installing a chip. It seems (to me) that I'm taking a little bit bigger risk by installing a product like a high performance chip than by improving the existing airflow with an intake/exhaust.

You should research this act, evaluate the mod you want to make and then decide on the benefits of the mod vs. the risk involed and then decide if you want go ahead with the mod.

Just my .02 cents.
Good luck.
I think the key words of the subsection here is "which is identified by brand, trade, or corporate name; " which I interpret to mean that Ford cannot in their warranty identify a product by name such as Banks.

I am no lawyer, but have experience with lawyers and negotiating contracts.

Bottom line to all this is to follow the money trail. Some dealers will honor the warranty because Ford pays them for warranty work. I think it depends on what it would cost Ford or the dealer for the warranty work and how blatant the modification. I had the rear main on my truck replaced. They did it in a about 3 hours. When I went to pick up my truck ( It was sitting there ready) they still had the ticket open to make sure they got the maximum time they could charge Ford for the work.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2004 | 08:38 PM
  #13  
emtabmm's Avatar
emtabmm
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
From: South Central In.
Originally posted by ssls6
Don't forget that the "burden of proof" lies with the consumer.


Oh you naive people, I love all of you but the reality is my manager and I go round and round every day.

Me="Is this a warrantable repair?"
Mgr= "Can you prove the defect was caused by the aftermarket modification?"

Part 1) Me= "no" Mgr = "Cover it"


Part 2) Me="Yes" Mgr = "Deny it"



Every time an issue comes up........
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2004 | 09:01 PM
  #14  
f250mike's Avatar
f250mike
New User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach
[QUOTE]Originally posted by emtabmm
[B]Oh you naive people, I love all of you but the reality is my manager and I go round and round every day.

Me="Is this a warrantable repair?"
Mgr= "Can you prove the defect was caused by the aftermarket modification?"

It seems from this post (if I'm reading it correctly) that what I've heard and read about aftermarket parts is correct then. If the aftermarket part caused the failure then nasty break!

Would you be kind enough to give some examples of mods that did cause failures resulting in the denial of the factor warranty?

I would like to make some moderate performance mods to mine (intake, exhaust, 4.5" leveling kit) but do not wish to "push the envelope" and cause myself some grief down the road.

I would really appreciate your insights and thanks in advance.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2004 | 05:39 AM
  #15  
emtabmm's Avatar
emtabmm
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
From: South Central In.
filters/cold air intakes that caused "dusting" of turbo's, chips/programmers that cause driveability issues, lift kits improperly installed causing premature susp wear/excessive driveline angles, etc....
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 AM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE