Notices
Computer Chips & Tuners  

modifications to a speed density system

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 11:35 AM
  #1  
grandaddy's66's Avatar
grandaddy's66
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: Eastern, Iowa
Question modifications to a speed density system

I have an 89 F-150 ext cab 4wd with a 5.8L and E30D.
How much modification can one do before one starts having trouble with the speed density system and therefore needs to burn a chip?

K&N?
Headers?
True dual exhaust or cat back? (or neither?)
6-71 blower with dual Projections and nitrous (just kidding)
Trans mods?
Is there any way I can easily reprogram the computer now for a little more juju?
I'm in the process of building a nice, torquey, stroked 351 that will DEFINITELY require a new chip, but for now, I want to do all I can to pep this old boy up and will not be going to a '93 Lightning MAF setup. Thanks!

I put a copy of this thread over in the 86-97 forum to see if those fellers can lend a hand - I'm not sure how to place the same thread in 2 places
 

Last edited by grandaddy's66; Dec 19, 2003 at 11:43 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 01:23 AM
  #2  
FTE Ken's Avatar
FTE Ken
Post Fiend
25 Year Member
Joined: Jan 1997
Posts: 23,165
Likes: 17
From: Enjoying the real world.
Long tube headers will cause problems and set off the check engine light.

Blowers.... needs custom programmed chip.

What type of trans mods?

Yes, the computer can be reprogrammed by adding a chip. It can't be flash programmed like modern EEC-V computers.
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2003 | 12:00 AM
  #3  
grandaddy's66's Avatar
grandaddy's66
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: Eastern, Iowa
Don't want to be rude and not reply, Ken, just getting all kinds of traffic over on the 87-96 board. Thanks for weighing in, though. Some differ with you over there about the headers, however. I wouldn't mind having you take a look over yonder and weighing in with some more of your good advice.
 

Last edited by grandaddy's66; Dec 27, 2003 at 12:06 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2003 | 12:15 AM
  #4  
FTE Ken's Avatar
FTE Ken
Post Fiend
25 Year Member
Joined: Jan 1997
Posts: 23,165
Likes: 17
From: Enjoying the real world.
Okay... I'll chime in over there.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2004 | 01:51 AM
  #5  
bigblu's Avatar
bigblu
Senior User
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Az
Speed density system can handle virtually all mods, including H-C-I. The key factor is the cam. as speed density requires manifold vacuum to run properly. You can run headers of any size (long or shortys).

SD cams should not exceed 218*DUR@.050 INT/224*DUR@.050.
The LSA must be at least 114, and no narrower. Otherwise idle problems and surging will occur, thus messing up the SD computer.

Visit some mustang sites (50tech.com), and you'll see many SD stangs have run vertually all mods, including blowers, nitrous, with excellent results. There's only a few places that will burn a chip for SD, most people will convert to mass air flow. It's a very cheap conversion, they get much more precise A/F ratio, and cam size is no longer a factor.

FYI-my husband dictated this to me (sitting next to me, explaining to me also). He worked with SD for 11 years on his stang before switching to a stroker motor with a much larger cam, thus requiring the maf upgrade. Which can be done for $300.

Here's my hubby's site for additional info. He explains about SD vs MAF on it. He's well known on many sites as an SD guru.
http://www.50tech.com/cobragt87/
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2004 | 02:40 PM
  #6  
grandaddy's66's Avatar
grandaddy's66
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: Eastern, Iowa
bigblu,

Am I correct in hearing you say that I can do the referenced mods and not have to burn a custom chip for the EEC-IV computer? There has been much discussion on both sides of that position. I checked your website and like what I saw and read. Just wanting to make sure I am reading you right (which I hope I am).

Thanks for weighing in...j
 

Last edited by grandaddy's66; Jan 2, 2004 at 02:45 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2004 | 01:37 AM
  #7  
bigblu's Avatar
bigblu
Senior User
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Az
Yup, you're right. The ideal cam would be the NS264Hr. Pulls nice to 5800-6000rpm.
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2004 | 01:17 PM
  #8  
Stroker Power's Avatar
Stroker Power
New User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Originally posted by bigblu
Yup, you're right. The ideal cam would be the NS264Hr. Pulls nice to 5800-6000rpm.
thats the NX264HR

Scott
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:18 AM.