When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
All the shocks care about is their shaft speed and their only job is slowing it down.
true but I feel like that’s not the whole story because lots of variable can impact that valve speed
Shock size and the valving could probably be adjusted to react much differently and I’d say that would call for some differences depending on the vehicles weight.
Which is why all the high end lift kits have not only properly tuned springs but also properly tuned shocks. So tucks that might weigh up to 1000lbs different could probably benefit from shocks designed specifically for it. Just comes down to how much $$$ one would like to spend
true but I feel like that’s not the whole story because lots of variable can impact that valve speed
Shock size and the valving could probably be adjusted to react much differently and I’d say that would call for some differences depending on the vehicles weight.
Which is why all the high end lift kits have not only properly tuned springs but also properly tuned shocks. So tucks that might weigh up to 1000lbs different could probably benefit from shocks designed specifically for it. Just comes down to how much $$$ one would like to spend
Nope. Your feelings notwithstanding, when it comes to fundamental shock performance, controlling the shaft speed is the whole story. Damping circuits (aka valving), shock size, fluid volume, stroke length, and all the other variables are nothing but ways to regulate shaft speed and do so consistently.
The spring rate is vehicle weight dependent, but its only purpose is to support the weight of the vehicle in such a fashion to keep the shock functioning within its design parameters. That's why lighter vehicles have different spring rates than heavier ones. Yes, you can tune a shock to optimize damping performance for specific conditions, e.g. highway towing or desert racing, but that tuning regulates the shaft speed, and doesn't have anything to do with vehicle weight.
And lets face it, these are Super Duty trucks, and no matter what you paid for it, they're far from the pinnacle of suspension design and engineering. Even when the Rancho rep was posting here, he or she couldn't/wouldn't tell me what exactly the clicker regulated.
Nope. Your feelings notwithstanding, vehicle dynamics are modeled as a spring/mass/damper system. All three collectively control the dynamics. You cannot change one without affecting other.
I don't know what point you're attempting to argue, but it's not one that I made. Please explain if you can.
Let me break it down real simple like. A heavier mass will require more energy to be dissipated by the dampening system. Imagine a mass on a spring. Stretch it and let it go. That energy has to be dissipated by a dampener to stop the oscillation.
Agreed. Except I don't know what moisture has to do with it.
Originally Posted by #1 Stunna
Increase the mass and there is more energy that has to be dissipated to arrest the mass at the same number of oscillations.
Agreed.
Originally Posted by #1 Stunna
You cannot just put the same dampers on a heavier vehicle and expect the exact same performance.
Right, but the thing is, I never said any of that. However it does explain why heavier vehicles have higher spring rates, generally. Good job.
Originally Posted by #1 Stunna
It may be close enough for the girls we date, but there will be a difference. It’s physics.
A shock purpose is to keep the tires on the ground and control weight distribution. Too little damping and the tires can resonate from rough roads and bounce up and down like dribbling a basketball. Too much damping and you'll negate the spring and the tire will skip over rough roads. The weight that's important is the unsprung weight (tire, wheel, suspension pieces).
I'm not surprised that gas or diesel use the same shocks.
The shock is controlling the weight of the axle/suspension/tire & wheel....not necessarily the entire weight of the vehicle.
A Honda Civic hitting a pothole with it's small 15" car tire and one a-arm is far different than a SD with a 700lb axle, and 200lbs of tire & wheel...and since diesel and gas SD's use the same chassis and running gear, the same shock will work just fine for both.
I see this as a "demand" problem. How much demand is asked of the shock?? Given the dynamics of how a shock "works" it's not impossible to use the same shock on two different "weights". So we design a shock with multiple discs that will effect the rebound/compression as required. Not to mention as already stated your coil springs are different between the gasser and diesel (depending on options).
BTW...It's a Bilstein. This company has been around HOW long?? They have access to testing and engineering data points WAY beyond what we could post here. I'm not saying the ride isn't going to change, but damn engineers working for a company that's been around for like 70+ plus years......they have the experience.
Lots of good discussion on the topic but, to answer the OP's question regarding a different shock on the front for the heavier 6.7 versus the lighter 7.3, I look to the rear. The load on the rear axle can vary by several thousand pounds depending on load and the shocks remain the same.
Lots of good discussion on the topic but, to answer the OP's question regarding a different shock on the front for the heavier 6.7 versus the lighter 7.3, I look to the rear. The load on the rear axle can vary by several thousand pounds depending on load and the shocks remain the same.
Oh boy talk about contradicting the point you’re trying to make.
that’s not a good example to use. It’s exactly why unloaded pickups ride like **** over bumps. Because the springs & shocks are geared toward the potential to carry weight. If the springs and shocks were designed around never having to carry thousands of pounds of extra weight they would literally ride nicer empty.
unless you think unloaded f350s ride nice over bumps then you’re just crazy lol
Oh boy talk about contradicting the point you’re trying to make.
that’s not a good example to use. It’s exactly why unloaded pickups ride like **** over bumps. Because the springs & shocks are geared toward the potential to carry weight. If the springs and shocks were designed around never having to carry thousands of pounds of extra weight they would literally ride nicer empty.
unless you think unloaded f350s ride nice over bumps then you’re just crazy lol
My comparison has nothing to do with ride quality. Your reply to me combines both shocks and springs when comparing lighter and heavier vehicles.
Back to the original post, the OP was expecting the front shocks on a truck equipped with the 6.7 to be different than a truck equipped with the 7.3 because the 6.7 is heavier (by several hundred pounds). My example that the rear experiences significantly more change in load using the same shocks is good for the purpose of the OP's question.
The front springs are different for the 6.7. That addresses the heavier weight.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.