Notices
2022+ F-150 Lightning EV Electric 1/2-ton - Ford's all-electric F-150 has arrived!

Lightning Raptor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2024 | 09:59 PM
  #1  
FishOnOne's Avatar
FishOnOne
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,785
Likes: 2,558
From: The Great State of Texas
Lightning Raptor

Looks like Ford Performance may pull the trigger on an EV Raptor

 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2024 | 10:20 AM
  #2  
captainp4's Avatar
captainp4
Trailering
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 21
Likes: 8
Saw that the other day, definitely cool. Gotta wonder what the hit to the range would be if they built it
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2024 | 05:35 PM
  #3  
twobelugas's Avatar
twobelugas
Logistics Pro
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 2,245
It's hard to find F150 Raptors for under 90k these days. I can't wait to see how much these things go for if they get built.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2024 | 05:43 PM
  #4  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,478
Likes: 738
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
The physics of the thing don’t make sense to me. The ER only gets its 320-mile range because of the 130 kWh pack, which is the second-largest on the road right now. The Hummer and Silverado will go further with a double-stacked battery, but how can you do that to an F150 with the existing chassis?

Who would pay even more for a truck that wouldn’t go 200 miles?
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2024 | 06:13 PM
  #5  
twobelugas's Avatar
twobelugas
Logistics Pro
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 2,245
Originally Posted by Tom
The physics of the thing don’t make sense to me. The ER only gets its 320-mile range because of the 130 kWh pack, which is the second-largest on the road right now. The Hummer and Silverado will go further with a double-stacked battery, but how can you do that to an F150 with the existing chassis?

Who would pay even more for a truck that wouldn’t go 200 miles?
The Lightning is already 6500 lbs or so, the extra suspension and other bits will probably add another 500 or more pounds of weight to be able to handle the anticipated abuse, and the bigger tires will have more rolling resistance for sure moving 7000+ pounds plus passengers and cargo around. That's around the same weight as my CCLB 4wd F250 with the gas engine.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2024 | 06:53 PM
  #6  
RLXXI's Avatar
RLXXI
Lead Driver
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 7,128
Likes: 1,945
From: Sportsman's Paradise
Originally Posted by Tom
The physics of the thing don’t make sense to me. The ER only gets its 320-mile range because of the 130 kWh pack, which is the second-largest on the road right now. The Hummer and Silverado will go further with a double-stacked battery, but how can you do that to an F150 with the existing chassis?

Who would pay even more for a truck that wouldn’t go 200 miles?
People with more money than sense I'd wager. Rich mans toy.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2024 | 07:10 PM
  #7  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,478
Likes: 738
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by twobelugas
The Lightning is already 6500 lbs or so, the extra suspension and other bits will probably add another 500 or more pounds of weight to be able to handle the anticipated abuse, and the bigger tires will have more rolling resistance for sure moving 7000+ pounds plus passengers and cargo around. That's around the same weight as my CCLB 4wd F250 with the gas engine.
I think it’s much more about rolling and wind resistance than weight. We see thread after thread here on FTE about the MPG penalty that comes with a lift kit. Lots of threads that also discuss the MPG hit that comes with aggressive tires, as well. These mods don’t add any significant weight, but the penalty is noticeable.

The Rivian R1T is rated for about 10% less range on A/T tires. Probably the best comparison is the current-gen 3.5L EcoBoost F150 against the Raptor.



I think the Raptor is a neat truck, but’s built to be an expensive plaything. A Raptor Lightning would be an impractical expensive plaything. To each their own, I guess. 🤷‍♂️
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
flysniper
2022+ F-150 Lightning EV
14
Aug 10, 2022 03:16 PM
fla.boy
Lightning, Harley-Davidson F-150, Roush F-150 & Saleen F-150
29
Mar 25, 2008 11:47 PM
jermdawg
Supercharger, Turbocharger, Nitrous Oxide & Water/Methanol Injection
1
May 11, 2006 03:31 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 AM.