When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
CID x max RPM / 3456 ... 460 x 5000 / 3456 = 666cfm
What is done to the engine to make that HP? No accessories? 410hp is basically gross rating...I would run the 650 and install/borrow a vac gauge to check vacuum restriction at WOT. I would assume the place should have this data on hand if they have the ability to dyno the built engine. If you have restriction, then yep would probably need to step up in size. Also, depends what you consider max RPM for the thing since the HP peak is 4800rpm.
Good points thanks.... I'm not a tech so when you ask "What was done to the engine?" Do the attached build sheets not answer that? What am I missing? Thank you
CID x max RPM / 3456 ... 460 x 5000 / 3456 = 666cfm
What is done to the engine to make that HP? No accessories? 410hp is basically gross rating...I would run the 650 and install/borrow a vac gauge to check vacuum restriction at WOT. I would assume the place should have this data on hand if they have the ability to dyno the built engine. If you have restriction, then yep would probably need to step up in size. Also, depends what you consider max RPM for the thing since the HP peak is 4800rpm.
need to include volumetric eff as well in your calculation. But I agree, it will be at or close to 650.
Yup... near as I can read thats it.....so any fedback on if it'd be good/ bad and how so if I went with recommended 750 cfm carb up from 650cfm?
EDIT... I went back and re read your input. Makes sense even to this non tech guy. i did some research YouTubing carbs... kinda sounded like carbs are all about air flow and engine is the thing pulling air so maybe the builders strongly recommended 750 cfm due to 460 engine? Im guessing going up from 650 to 750 would make the already gas mpg even worse? If thats even possible lol.
Last edited by HubbaHubbaLife; Dec 22, 2023 at 02:05 PM.
Yup... near as I can read thats it.....so any fedback on if it'd be good/ bad and how so if I went with recommended 750 cfm carb up from 650cfm?
EDIT... I went back and re read your input. Makes sense even to this non tech guy. i did some research YouTubing carbs... kinda sounded like carbs are all about air flow and engine is the thing pulling air so maybe the builders strongly recommended 750 cfm due to 460 engine? Im guessing going up from 650 to 750 would make the already gas mpg even worse? If thats even possible lol.
no your mpg will not decrease by going from 650 to 750. Can you run the 750, yes you can with no ill effects. Will there be any benefits? No. Unless you're spinning up real high there's no reason to go high. To somewhat answer your question, you can have issues going to a carb that's too large as you'll run into lean conditions and stumbling, even when trying to compensate with larger jets. On the flip side, going smaller then what is recommended will cause no issues besides power decrease and could lower max rpm.
What are you using the truck for and is it going in a truck?
A 650 isn't going to totally kill performance, you may lose 15 hp way out on the top, but if you are just driving around or towing you dont need to go buy a 750.
no your mpg will not decrease by going from 650 to 750. Can you run the 750, yes you can with no ill effects. Will there be any benefits? No. Unless you're spinning up real high there's no reason to go high. To somewhat answer your question, you can have issues going to a carb that's too large as you'll run into lean conditions and stumbling, even when trying to compensate with larger jets. On the flip side, going smaller then what is recommended will cause no issues besides power decrease and could lower max rpm.
Good data, thank you. I heard back from previous owner/ engine builder Ford guy.... he said 650 cfm was mostly about costs... Same basic performance with less costs.... says lots of folks overlook what trans a vehicle has ..... Automatics take 25% of the hp just "working"....
So I guess there we have it. stays a 650 CFM and I learned something. Now onto all these leaks
Now there we go..... I heard back from the previous owner who had the engine tweaked.... he basically said the same thing. He's a retired Ford Race Engine guy. Guessing maybe he knows whats up... sold it cause of medial issues ... appreciate your input brutha
Got it thanks..... just using it for fun.... minimal driving other than to empress the teenage boys in Baja MX as I go through gears Folks love these old trucks down south
Increased RPM is the reason for bigger carbs
Think Boss 302 and Z-28 Chev
Both 302 CID and both with a Holley 780 vacuum secondary
Both turned 8000 rpm (well the early Boss Mustangs blew up with their cast pistons)(and had a rev limiter)
Run them both and check the throttle response
I think you'll like the 780 but jet it down
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.