When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
That article says only 1 INTEL chip fab in the USA.
There are far more fab's than that in the USA. TI has a HUGE one here in Dallas(2 buildings with a 3rd slated to open I think this year) and has bought and is completely renovating one in Salt Lake City. My buddy is an engineer at TI here in Dallas but is very involved in the rebuild out in Salt Lake. I think he said 80 brand new machines at an average cost of 10 million per. Thats a lot of capital.
I think the manufacturers have backed themselves into corners on production, I’m sure they reward their design engineers to remove costs for example take $1 production cost out of an F150 and they product 900,000 units a year it adds up.
just to beat on this drum a little more, by far, not all chips are created equal. The units in our vehicles are fairly simple, fairly easy to make (relative to that world) and robust
Unfortunately, the big money is in phones, pc's, 5G, the cloud and like. The shift has been underway to manufacture these chips at the expense of the lesser pieces of the puzzle
The days of $1 components have turned to $25 or maybe $50, not sure it's that dramatic, but if the market bears...the only way to stop it is to open as many plants we can n a hurry
It was my understanding that in addition to the chip industry being at a reduced production capacity that some auto manufacturers put a stop on their recurring orders early on in the pandemic. The chip manufacturers found other customers to buy the forfeited production capacity. This put those auto makers at the back of the line and/or looking for new options. I do not have any articles to reference at the moment but maybe someone else does.
It was my understanding that in addition to the chip industry being at a reduced production capacity that some auto manufacturers put a stop on their recurring orders early on in the pandemic. The chip manufacturers found other customers to buy the forfeited production capacity. This put those auto makers at the back of the line and/or looking for new options. I do not have any articles to reference at the moment but maybe someone else does.
This is precisely what my buddy in that industry has told us.
Ford has factories in Mexico. If this was an issue with China they could get the chips by having them go through Mexico with minimum 'transformation'. When Ford shut down manufacturing due to Covid they cancelled orders with their Japanese supplier (not China) based on Ford's sales predictions.
This has more to do with the cost of change not the willingness to change. Changing chips can require extensive redesign of the printed circuit board it is mounted to. Changing a processor chip is the most disruptive as supporting chips such as memory, buffers, communication and voltage regulators must also be changed. Software has to be rewritten. Then there is the testing to validate the design. This all costs money.
"Ancient" chips in the technology market are only 3 to 5 years old. The auto industry will always lag behind the chips in cell phones, computers and electronic games. Those platforms thrive on 2 to 3 year life cycles and customers who are who enthusiastically discard an operating device for the latest being offered.
It's great that Intel is moving chip production to the US and others are sure to follow. But the recent shortage isn't simply an offshore problem. It is a labor shortage resulting from a worldwide pandemic. Even if the chips were made here, it doesn't mean we wouldn't have chip shortages in the automotive industry due to production issues, transportation issues or higher priority uses (cell phones and games).
I agree to disagree.
The chips used in your new super duty are circa 2004. The cost to companies to make such a chip causes companies not to want to make them, so they make the new generation where all the money is at.....Simple Capitalism. You could run your super duty with a new Raspberry Pi which costs about $25. Its time to cut the old and install new, rather then tool up the old to put into the new.
The chips used in your new super duty are circa 2004. The cost to companies to make such a chip causes companies not to want to make them, so they make the new generation where all the money is at.....Simple Capitalism. You could run your super duty with a new Raspberry Pi which costs about $25. Its time to cut the old and install new, rather then tool up the old to put into the new.
I would like to know the specifics around your claim that the chips used in new SD's are circa 2004. What chips and where are they used? Chip manufacturers typically do not support chips designs that old. The technology they are based on is obsolete and the associate manufacturing processes and tools have been abandoned.
A chip from 2004 would not support the communication protocols, memory and data requirements for the distributed computer systems, sensors and software in today's vehicles. In my previous job we would get end of life notices from manufacturers for chips that were much younger than 18 years. Depending on the chip, it could be as early as 8. Part of our component selection process was assessing the chips maturity and the manufacturer's plans for supporting its production. The pace of change for chips has accelerated in recent years making it more challenging to design circuits for long service life products like cars and trucks.
I would like to know the specifics around your claim that the chips used in new SD's are circa 2004. What chips and where are they used? Chip manufacturers typically do not support chips designs that old. The technology they are based on is obsolete and the associate manufacturing processes and tools have been abandoned.
A chip from 2004 would not support the communication protocols, memory and data requirements for the distributed computer systems, sensors and software in today's vehicles. In my previous job we would get end of life notices from manufacturers for chips that were much younger than 18 years. Depending on the chip, it could be as early as 8. Part of our component selection process was assessing the chips maturity and the manufacturer's plans for supporting its production. The pace of change for chips has accelerated in recent years making it more challenging to design circuits for long service life products like cars and trucks.
From the MT article I linked above.
"Cars use a lot of older, lower-tech "legacy" chips that cost only a few dollars each and have lower profit margins so there is less incentive for chipmakers to invest in more capacity. The low cost of legacy chips belies their importance. Vehicles rely on such chips for everything from door locks and infotainment to brakes and advanced driver assist systems. Advanced wafers that incorporate more chips are more plentiful; suppliers would rather make more sophisticated chips, made with newer technology that can put more chips on a single silicon wafer, and yield a better return."
I know that is not as specific as you would like so you or someone else will need to dig further.
"Cars use a lot of older, lower-tech "legacy" chips that cost only a few dollars each and have lower profit margins so there is less incentive for chipmakers to invest in more capacity. The low cost of legacy chips belies their importance. Vehicles rely on such chips for everything from door locks and infotainment to brakes and advanced driver assist systems. Advanced wafers that incorporate more chips are more plentiful; suppliers would rather make more sophisticated chips, made with newer technology that can put more chips on a single silicon wafer, and yield a better return."
I know that is not as specific as you would like so you or someone else will need to dig further.
I agree with the quote. I don't agree that the "legacy" chips used in today's cars are 18 years old or that using the "legacy" chips is an indication that the automotive industry is not willing to change.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.