Receiver Weight Rating
Some folks mistakenly believe that V-5 is a redundant way of saying "Class V", which is the Roman numeral for Class 5, which they believe is a hitch rating.
It isn't.
There is no such thing as a "Class V" hitch.
Heresy, you say?
Can't say I blame you for clicking away, since practically every hitch manufacturer advertises hitches that are supposedly "Class 5", or "Class V", depending on how classy their copy writer is.
But all of that is BS.
Let's go back to what V-5 really means in order to explain.
V-5 is simply an identifying number to a standard, not a rating of a hitch.
The "5" in "V-5" means that this standard happens to be the fifth of twenty two (22) different standards created by the Vehicle Equipment Safety Commission (hereinafter referred to as VESC), which is what the "V" in "V-5" is short for.
The VESC was established by Congress with the passage of the Beamer Resolution in 1958, where Congress granted consent in advance for States of form interstate commissions and compacts in the field of traffic safety, to encourage the prompt adoption of uniform standards. States were traditionally responsible for building, maintaining, and regulating highways, but with the expansion of the interstate highway system under Eisenhower, along with the growth of suburbias, the affordability of travel (gas 10 cents a gallon), trucking supplanting the railways, and an auto centric culture... Americans drove across state lines more, which exacerbated the interstate aspects of motor vehicle related regulation.
A Driver's License Compact was created between States, as was the Vehicle Equipment Safety Commission, which convened for 20 years, from 1962 through 1983.
The VESC established minimum performance standards for ancillary vehicle equipment, where no federal standards previously existed. I won't list all 22 standards, but I'll list 1-5, so as to help anyone rule out any assumptions about 1-4.
Regulation VESC V-1 Minimum Requirements and Uniform Test Procedures for New Tires for Passenger Cars and Station Wagons
Regulation VESC V-2 Minimum Requirements and Uniform Test Procedures for Retreaded Tires for Passenger Cars and Station Wagons
Regulation VESC V-3 Minimum Requirements and Uniform Test Procedures for Motor Vehicle Brake Linings
Regulation VESC V-4 Safety Glazing Materials for Motor Vehicles Operation on Land Highways
Regulation VESC V-5 Minimum Requirements for Motor Vehicle Connecting Devices and Towing Methods
That's all that V-5 stands for.
When a hitch manufacturer self certifies that they tested their hitch, whether rated at 2,000 lbs or 10,000 lbs, pursuant to the standards set forth in V-5, then they can put V-5 on their hitch as an indication of compliance with the standard.
V-5 is not a rating. It is a VESC standard. When a hitch says "V-5 Rated", that means that the hitch was rated per the V-5 standard for rating hitches, which applies to all poundage ratings up to 10,000 lbs.
A similar standard for rating towing apparatus can be found with SAE standards. SAE J684A represents a standard for testing and rating Trailer Couplings, Hitches, and Safety Chains—Automotive Type, and SAE J2807 represents a standard establishing Performance Requirements for Determining Tow-Vehicle Gross Combination Weight Rating and Trailer Weight Rating.
The V-5 standard defines four (4) and ONLY four hitch ratings, as follows:
- Class I
- Class II
- Class III
- Class IV
There is no so called "Class V" in the VESC V-5 standard, nor in the SAE J684A standard. As 10,000 lbs is the maximum trailer weight that can be conventionally towed (bumper pull) without a higher class of driver's license (ie Class A, whether commercial or non-commercial), the VESC did not establish any testing standards beyond 10,000 lbs conventional towing.
The term "Class V" began life as an advertising trick introduced in the late '80's by Reese Towing Products to distinguish their first to market 2 1/2" receivers, which they named Titan, as these hitches were indeed bigger than any other hitch on the market 30-40 years ago, which at that time were all 2" receivers. At some point in the early aughts, another company sued Reese for using the Titan name, even though Reese had already been using it for more than a decade. Reese acquiesced and for several years renamed their Titan line of hitches to "TowBeast". The TowBeast name never resonated with consumers, and eventually Reese found a legal way to reclaim the Titan name, and their larger 2.5" and 3" hitch products have been renamed Titan ever since.
In recent years, many other hitch manufacturers and vehicle OEMs have leveraged the favorable physics of larger diameter tubing to create higher performing hitches without increasing weight. Now, 2.5" and 3" hitches are common place, and with the OEMs this usually means a bit less material thickness (to lower weight) and more clever gusset geometry (to increase towing capacity per SAE standards, as the VESC is antiquated and does not speak to ratings higher than 10,000 lbs.).
VESC-V-5-Minimum-Requirements-for-Motor-Vehicle-Connecting-Devices-and-Towing-Methods in PDF
To best answer your question (and facilitate the drawing of your own conclusions) I added a link to the pdf file of the last revised version of VESC V-5 in my post above.
Any towing apparatus can meet the V-5 Rating for the highest weight ratings defined under that standard (Class IV - 10,000 lbs.), while yet meeting a higher weight rating defined by another testing methodology.
Therefore, a hitch being rated by the manufacturer at 15,200 lbs is not mutually exclusive to the same hitch also having a V-5 rating in self certifying the parameters defined by that standard.
Since the V-5 rating does not speak to nor contemplate ratings at 15,200 lbs, then even if a manufacturer arrives at those higher levels of ratings using test procedures outlined in V-5, it is a matter of interpretation, which I leave you to conclude, as to whether the manufacturer is "taking liberties" or being inclusive in good faith.
Trending Topics
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
if I read this right, any trailer over 10k lbs that is bumper pulled requires higher class DL ? I’ve never heard of that
2100# of tongue weight for a truck with 2355# of payload. Just hang it all on the rear bumper I guess.















