When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Who knows where the stock 400 pistons really sit in a typical engine they probably are that far down especially if you're using a rebuilder piston. I was just thinking that there are probably a lot more performance orientated pistons for the 351C than the 400 and those will probably have a taller compression height. 1.653 is what the KB Icon catalog shows for a 351C piston. If you look up a Sealed Power 427P rebuilder piston for a 400 it shows 1.630. That's a heck of a difference right there.
The 1.71 is correct, and the 13cc will make your static +/- 9.8 which is very acceptable.
Maybe ask them for their comments with regard to matching their pistons with your proposed build etc.
Maybe see if you can find user reviews on their pistons too. (I haven't heard of DSS, not that that matters.)
@ dmash : There's nothing wrong with the pistons in your link. However, they are suited to open chamber heads. TM used to offer KB pistons similar to the above DSS pistons which are suited to closed chamber heads.
I know this is a little bit older thread but I just wanted to give a source for pistons.
I found an outfit in Orem, Utah called "Clegg Engine and Machine" that custom made forged flat-top pistons for my 400 to get me exactly the compression ratio I needed. (needed about 9.3:1 SCR) They were actually very pleasant to work with and as I recall, the price of the set was right around $600.......which I realize is quite a bit compared to off-the-shelf stock pieces but since raising the compression on these old things seems to give the most "bang for the buck" and having limited selection....... I didn't think it was outlandish.
They said they shipped about 10 sets of forged Ford 400 pistons per month.
No big news got a cam selected. Went with Howard’s with their link bar lifters. Eric at Howard’s was great to deal with, only outfit that answers emails and promptly even. Was tryin to get comp to do a grind similar to xe262h in a roller profile, no response from anyone after multiple emails(same with the whole family comp, crane, lunati). Hopefully that and the intake I ordered in March will show up around the same time and I’ll tear down. Intakes latest ship update is March.
Had a couple leaking freeze plugs and cracked exhaust manifold so now have some hedman fenderwell exits and am waiting for magnaflows to show up to build the exhaust, going stainless 2.5 dump in front of rear wheel.
Starting to doubt this cam choice. Looks like at 9.5 static it would be 8.5-9 dcr depending on the calculator I use.
seems like increasing duration lowers dcr but also moves rpm range higher.
this is a big heavy truck, looking for torque down low not top speed. 87 preferred, 91 is the max for pump around here, I spend a bit of time where there’s only 87 but can probably manage with capacity.
That cam choice is extremely poor if you want to haul a big heavy truck and need torque just off idle. You would be much better off with a lower compression ratio, shorter duration, single pattern and a tighter lobe separation. The only thing that changes dynamic compression is the intake valve closing event. Make it earlier and the compression stroke is longer, make it later and the compression stroke is shorter. Longer duration and or a higher intake centerline moves the intake closing point later.