When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'd suggest following the Ford Owner's Manual. IMO, I do believe Top Tier fuels are better. I see better MPG with them.
FUEL QUALITY - GASOLINE
Choosing the Right Fuel
Your vehicle is designed to operate on regular unleaded gasoline with a minimum pump (R+M)/2 octane rating of 87.
Some fuel stations, particularly those in high altitude areas, offer fuels posted as regular unleaded gasoline with an octane rating below 87. The use of these fuels could result in engine damage that will not be covered by the vehicle warranty.
For best overall vehicle and engine performance, premium fuel with an octane rating of 91 or higher is recommended. The performance gained by using premium fuel is most noticeable in hot weather as well as other conditions, for example when towing a trailer. See Towing (page 277). Do not be concerned if the engine sometimes knocks lightly. However, if the engine knocks heavily while using fuel with the recommended octane rating, contact an authorized dealer to prevent any engine damage.
We recommend Top Tier detergent gasolines, where available to help minimize engine deposits and maintain optimal vehicle and engine performance. For additional information, refer to www.toptiergas.com.
Note: Use of any fuel for which the vehicle was not designed can impair the emission control system, cause loss of vehicle performance, and cause damage to the engine which may not be covered by the vehicle Warranty.
Do not use:
• Diesel fuel.
• Fuels containing kerosene or paraffin.
• Fuel containing more than 15% ethanol or E85 fuel.
• Fuels containing methanol.
• Fuels containing metallic-based additives, including manganese-based compounds.
• Fuels containing the octane booster additive, methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT).
• Leaded fuel, using leaded fuel is prohibited by law.
The use of fuels with metallic compounds such as methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (commonly known as MMT), which is a manganese-based fuel additive, will impair engine performance and affect the emission control system
1. If no one has read the Owners Manual, why should they bother to read your post?
2. If no one has read the Owners Manual, or post #2 of this thread, why should they bother to read your post?
3. LOLOLOL
PS> Don’t take me serious......I am just having some fun!
Does octane matter? Should I be putting in high octane? What are the benefits/drawbacks if any?
My understanding is (for what ever that's worth) octanes only function is to prevent engine knock period. So if your engines not knocking you don't need more. How ever if you put in higher octane the ECU will not see knocking until later in the advancing timing and will advance the timing more and you'll get better performance. I don't know if there is still a knock sensor, there used to be. I have no idea if or how the ECU knows to keep advancing the timing with higher octane.
I have never seen ethanol free gas @ the pump. I buy it in the can how ever for my small equipment ( string line trimmer, blower, etc.), I think it's great, it's pricey thou. There was a time when ethanol came out there was a lot of problems with plastic fuel line failure.
The 7.3L (currently) is not supposed to use E85 anyway, so this is a moot point. The 10-15% ethanol most stations carry is not going to harm anything in the engine or fuel system, or corn prices.
I was using E85 as an example for the test I did in wifes Jeep. May wanna read closer. The 10-15% ethanol DOES affect mileage. I have proved it several times. Also, ethanol does reduce engine life. That has been proven too. So, put in what ya want. It's your rig....
The bigger point I'm making here is ethanol DID/DOES affect beef & pork prices. More people using E, drives up corn prices. That's great for the farmer that sells corn for his crop. NOT great for the consumer buying meat. Cattle & hog farmer has to pay more for feed -> which drives up beef and pork prices........
I was using E85 as an example for the test I did in wifes Jeep. May wanna read closer. The 10-15% ethanol DOES affect mileage. I have proved it several times. Also, ethanol does reduce engine life. That has been proven too. So, put in what ya want. It's your rig....
I understand the logic behind a reduction in fuel mileage as ethanol has less energy per volume but I don't see the logic behind reduced engine life for an engine that is designed to run on x% ethanol. Probably a moot point for me as I have ran engines to near or beyond 100,000 miles on 87 with 10% ethanol without any engine problems. The body rusts out long before the engine gives up.
I had good luck with 89 on a 6.2 gas before. Especially at high miles, it did not perform well on 87.
93 made no difference.
As far as midrange they just blend at the pump.
I never thought about that. There is no separate underground tank for midgrade the pump blends low and high ? That would make perfect sense, one less tank in a usually limited space with less construction and maintenance cost
The bigger point I'm making here is ethanol DID/DOES affect beef & pork prices. More people using E, drives up corn prices. That's great for the farmer that sells corn for his crop. NOT great for the consumer buying meat. Cattle & hog farmer has to pay more for feed -> which drives up beef and pork prices........
And here I thought all along that these prices were set by the open market......I.E. supply and demand commodities markets, rather than what they cost to produce! Silly me.
I could have been raising beef and charging what I wanted rather than getting market price. I could have made money ranching instead of busting my **** working in the oilfields! And now back to our regular program.
Would be interesting to have an Ike gauntlet type comparison 87 vs 91. I know the 3.5 ecoboosts I’ve had liked 89 when towing, 91 made no additional improvements.
I never thought about that. There is no separate underground tank for midgrade the pump blends low and high ? That would make perfect sense, one less tank in a usually limited space with less construction and maintenance cost
Yup I believe so, they blend it to 89 around here.
I usually top off my 2.7 ecoboost with 93 if I know I’ll be towing. Unloaded 87 works just as good.
And here I thought all along that these prices were set by the open market......I.E. supply and demand commodities markets, rather than what they cost to produce! Silly me.
I could have been raising beef and charging what I wanted rather than getting market price. I could have made money ranching instead of busting my **** working in the oilfields! And now back to our regular program.
In this case, beef prices going up because the cost of feed goes up, is still a result of supply and demand. If the farmer's costs exceed what the beef can be sold for at a profit, the farmer will grow or do something else. The supply of beef goes down followed by the price going up (assuming people still want to eat beef). When the price of beef goes up to a point where the farmer can make money then he'll resume raising cattle.
I'll pay the extra 20 cents/gallon (at least that's how much more it is here) for the non E product. This of course is for 87. I've never like anything with E in it. They never had it 30 years ago. Guess i'm old school.......
I'll pay the extra 20 cents/gallon (at least that's how much more it is here) for the non E product. This of course is for 87. I've never like anything with E in it. They never had it 30 years ago. Guess i'm old school.......
Wow, that's cheap. Here in the mid-atlantic, E Free gas is ~70-80 cents more per gallon over regular. Note that it is typically 90 octane too.
I'll pay the extra 20 cents/gallon (at least that's how much more it is here) for the non E product. This of course is for 87. I've never like anything with E in it. They never had it 30 years ago. Guess i'm old school.......
If it was only a 20 cent premium around here I would likely do it, but this morning it was a 55 cent difference ($1.67 vs $2.22) or 33%. I do run E0 in all my equipment (riding mower, Kawa Mule, generators,etc) and have zero issues with moisture and degradation. I just can't justify it in my SD.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.