When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
That said, there are (6) in my driveway right now and they all sound different.
Just as a side note, I can barely quench my curiousity as to how it seems all of these (99-03) trucks sound different from one another. Even stock for stock. Every time I hear one out in public idling, that is the first thing I notice. But there are so many possible variables in play that is makes it very hard to come to a conclusion.
I have driven my truck 350k miles, put 120k miles on my Excursion and have easily driven well over (100) 7.3’s.
I would argue that I have a great ear for what this engine can sound like. That said, there are (6) in my driveway right now and they all sound different. Quantifying the way they sound is futile - everyone would describe something different.
There are a few trendy mods that have no scientific data to support them, but they sure make people feel good! (Just read the reviews/posts) No harm in most of them, but I just refuse to be a lemming.
Many swear up and down that adding about 40:1 two stroke oil to the fuel makes theirs quieter. From recollection it was mostly Excursion owners, maybe 'we' think they should sound more like a soccer mom car than the bad azz heavy hauling diesel truck that it is. I tried this and checked it with a DB meter app on my phone as well as my ears and found no change. I then added WMO at about 40% oil/fuel mix and found no change, other than a bit more smoke on a cold start. The WMO I used wasn't truly WMO, it was mostly used hydraulic oil and ATF along with a little bit of old cheapo 2 stroke oil and some other unused motor oils that I had no use for. But still quite different from #2 diesel fuel so I expected a change.
My IDI might be a little less clattery on 100% WMO vs. diesel fuel, but that's an extreme change in fuel for maybe a minuscule change in sound. Neither engine shows a discernible change in power between the fuel types. I don't do great MPG monitoring so I don't have hard numbers between the fuel types, but that also doesn't seem to change.
I don't necessarily disagree, but I do have two observations:
1.) The bottom of the cup should be bottomed out against the top of the cylinder head; that is what stops it during the insertion process. Of course there still may be a very slight gap.
2.) I don't think of the copper washer so much as a "crush" or a "spring" washer, as some have described it. Copper expands with heat at a significantly higher rate than iron and steel. I think that is why they used copper in that location. Higher temperature makes it seal better, similar to copper exhaust gaskets. Of course it is softer, too. So there is maybe an initial crush of the washer during assembly, then further deformation of the washer due to expansion during temperature cycles. It could also be that the initial expansion of the copper pushes the injector up slightly, then it shrinks back, and that's why the hot retorque results in further movement of the bolts. However, I think that every time the copper reheats, it's going to seal again. Just a hunch though, really. Copper was selected for that location for a reason.
1. sure, but for there to be no "crushing" taking place all those surfaces would need to be machined both perfectly flat and parallel with each other and at a perfect right angle to the injector bore. to machine all 6 surfaces that precise would be both unlikely and cost prohibited. any minute deviation creates a high/low spot and now that causes never tension and acts as a spring. during the heat cycles the relatively soft ( compared to the injector tip and head ) cup and washer go through plastic deformation and become the shape of their mating surfaces, as that process happens the springiness goes away which would reduce the torque value of the bolt.
2. I think they used copper for the same reason brake calipers and other banjo type fittings use copper washers, because it deforms easily and conforms to the shape of the matting surfaces making it a good gasket. if you used steel in all of those surfaces it would require a greater degree of precision to make them all perfectly flat and parallel.
then again, its just my observation and a theory based on the design and materials I see and the challenges the engineers faced to make it seal and still be reasonably inexpensive to manufacture,
I have driven my truck 350k miles, put 120k miles on my Excursion and have easily driven well over (100) 7.3’s.
I would argue that I have a great ear for what this engine can sound like. That said, there are (6) in my driveway right now and they all sound different. Quantifying the way they sound is futile - everyone would describe something different.
There are a few trendy mods that have no scientific data to support them, but they sure make people feel good! (Just read the reviews/posts) No harm in most of them, but I just refuse to be a lemming.
Fair enough. No right or wrong here, just sharing personal experiences and results.
Originally Posted by RigCity
Wow this thread is messing me up!! lol My initial plan when doing the injector O-rings was to use denatured alcohol to clean all threads And have them as dry as possible. Based on what I read in the first post my plan doesn’t seem as right as I thought...
I wouldn't, denatured alcohol is toxic. I use Isopropyl with the concentration over 90%, then blow tho holy snot out of it with air.
It seems like 95% of 7.3s in the wild get by to a zillion miles or more even though many of us might say they could use a retorque. Mine probably would have gone another zillion miles. I retorqued mine when I shimmed my armature plates and didn't tell my girlfriend to expect anything different. I was satisfied by the quieter running and she mentioned it the first time she rode in the truck afterwards. Maybe she knows more than I give her credit for or maybe retorque helps.
1. sure, but for there to be no "crushing" taking place all those surfaces would need to be machined both perfectly flat and parallel with each other and at a perfect right angle to the injector bore. to machine all 6 surfaces that precise would be both unlikely and cost prohibited. any minute deviation creates a high/low spot and now that causes never tension and acts as a spring. during the heat cycles the relatively soft ( compared to the injector tip and head ) cup and washer go through plastic deformation and become the shape of their mating surfaces, as that process happens the springiness goes away which would reduce the torque value of the bolt.
2. I think they used copper for the same reason brake calipers and other banjo type fittings use copper washers, because it deforms easily and conforms to the shape of the matting surfaces making it a good gasket. if you used steel in all of those surfaces it would require a greater degree of precision to make them all perfectly flat and parallel.
then again, its just my observation and a theory based on the design and materials I see and the challenges the engineers faced to make it seal and still be reasonably inexpensive to manufacture,
You make some very good points.
The cups I just installed are the machined stainless ones from Clay. They are significantly more rigid than the stock brass cups. I am hoping this results in less loosening.
I'm just going to throw my two cents in here. I've owned one 7.3 in my life and changed the injectors once. So you definitely wouldn't describe me as very experienced.
Here's what I did: I torqued them down to 120 in-lbs with the existing hardware. The holes had oil in them and I figured that was good enough to lubricate them to ensure a reasonably accurate torque reading. No loc-tite! That just seems like a really bad idea to me. Then I ran the engine for an hour and torqued them down again (the "hot-torque"). They all took 1/4 to a 1/2 turn to return to spec - this is why loc-tite is a bad idea! The looseness wasn't because of the bolts backing out, it's because the injector has to seat itself into the bore, and the 60 minute vibration and heating cycle solves that. If you use loc-tite, you're just ensuring that the now-loose injectors won't back out any further, but you still aren't using the correct torque values.
Then I put everything back together.
This was in March 2017. Fast forward to late last year and 30,000 miles later. I was fixing a glow plug problem and had the driver's side valve cover off. I checked the torque on all four injectors on that side and two of them moved a tiny bit. The other two didn't move at all before the wrench clicked. I'm 100% satisfied that the injectors are torqued correctly and will stay that way.
I have an inexpensive set of Tekton torque wrenches. No idea how accurate they are as I've never had them checked.
Hmm, food for thought here. I will soon be doing injectors, glow plugs, gaskets w/harnesses. The shop manual only says torque to 10 lbf/ft and nothing else.
Hmm, food for thought here. I will soon be doing injectors, glow plugs, gaskets w/harnesses. The shop manual only says torque to 10 lbf/ft and nothing else.
That is all 99.9% of people have ever done. Re-torque is only discussed on this forum.
Please be aware that torque wrenches can be up to 20% off at the extremes of their range and parts store and HF torque wrenches are not reliable in any torque range.... I know of a few people who broke bolts using a tq wrench and there are stories in this thread where people appear to have not gotten them tight enough.
It's really surprising that no one really talks about re-torquing or hot-torquing injectors outside of this forum, given: 1) how much the injector "settles" in the bore, reducing tension on the hold-down bolt, and 2) how important Alliant says injector torque is.
I would really like to know how they put them in at the factory. They must have tooling that allows them to insert the injectors with a higher and more controlled force, before even installing the lower hold-down bolt, initially seating the injector better than we can. Particularly when we're trying to re-install the rear injectors while the engine is in the truck.
I would really like to know how they put them in at the factory. They must have tooling that allows them to insert the injectors with a higher and more controlled force, before even installing the lower hold-down bolt, initially seating the injector better than we can. Particularly when we're trying to re-install the rear injectors while the engine is in the truck.
Nope. Every factory injector hold-down bolt I've ever tested was below 100 in/lbs of torque - sometimes as low as 80. That's going all the way back to 94.5 7.3L
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.