When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Any reason why the eco boost family is not offered in a super duty? I dont want one, not a fan, but asking for a friend.
I don't expect that 3.5L TT would last too many miles towing 15k+ lbs...Also its widely understood that the Ecoboost only gets good mileage when your lightly loaded (empty)....a F-250 is the equivalent to a F-150 with 2500lbs in the bed, aka heavily loaded...
Super Duty trucks for the most part are used relatively heavily (not seen in this forum, but industry wide, they work) whereas F-150's are typically used lightly with the occasional heavy tow. Completely different duty cycle.
EcoBoost is an awesome engine. Hoever, I suspect its unloaded fuel economy in that heavier truck would be no better than the 6.2L V8. I always say that it's Eco OR Boost, not both. There are F150 owners who report better towing mileage with the 5.0L V8 then the EcoBoost.
A V8 Eco Boost would take too many sales away from the diesel.
If you could get a boosted big block that had the same towing capacity as the diesel but for half the cost it would be a no brainier. Even with a mileage hit you'd still come out ahead with the gas motor.
EcoBoost is an awesome engine. Hoever, I suspect its unloaded fuel economy in that heavier truck would be no better than the 6.2L V8. I always say that it's Eco OR Boost, not both. There are F150 owners who report better towing mileage with the 5.0L V8 then the EcoBoost.
Fuel economy expression outside of scientific validation is always suspect, but your overall impression is correct. It takes fuel to make torque/horsepower. There aren't very many engine designs that are not making the most out of every drop of fuel given existing manufacturing and regulatory rules so how much fuel it takes to make 300 horsepower is nearly the same from engine-to-engine. For a turbo engine, if you stay out of the boost, you will use less fuel but you also won't have the horsepower. You clearly make this point. The one real benefit to a small displacement turbo engine is you can get big displacement torque when you need it and enjoy some fuel economy when you don't need it due to smaller pumping loss. And, as you again point out, a 3.5E in a SD would be working much harder even unloaded since the SD weighs a lot more than an F150 so you'd b in the boost most of the time except when coasting down hill.
I think OP is looking as to why there isn't a boosted V8 - or that's my take on it. Having owned both types now my unloaded MPG in Ecoboost was ~17mpg and in 6.7 is ~15mpg. Towing our camper (7500lbs) was around 9mpg. Not sure what the F350 will do but we will find out Friday
Fuel capacity sucked at 26 gallons in the Ecoboost especially towing, 48 gallon upgrade was NICE!
I think OP is looking as to why there isn't a boosted V8 - or that's my take on it. Having owned both types now my unloaded MPG in Ecoboost was ~17mpg and in 6.7 is ~15mpg. Towing our camper (7500lbs) was around 9mpg. Not sure what the F350 will do but we will find out Friday
Fuel capacity sucked at 26 gallons in the Ecoboost especially towing, 48 gallon upgrade was NICE!
but there is a boosted V8 it just happens to be Diesel.
My father-in-law once told me how he was at a training class for Ford and they somehow got on the topic of the Triton V10 being turbo'd from the factory.
I didn't ask when this was so I'm not sure if it was when they were thinking about the idea of the Ecoboost, or at the beginning or what. All he said was the Ford engineer told them they didn't go forward with it because it actually did better than the current diesel (again I don't know what particular diesel engine it was or in what way it did better than the diesel), and therefore they didn't pursue it because it would have taken away from diesel sales and their associated profits.
This of course could all be hogwash from the engineer but given the upsale on the diesel I can also see it being true.
I think OP is looking as to why there isn't a boosted V8 - or that's my take on it. Having owned both types now my unloaded MPG in Ecoboost was ~17mpg and in 6.7 is ~15mpg. Towing our camper (7500lbs) was around 9mpg. Not sure what the F350 will do but we will find out Friday
Fuel capacity sucked at 26 gallons in the Ecoboost especially towing, 48 gallon upgrade was NICE!
I'm referring to the current eco boost engines out there (no such thing as a V8 ecoboost......yet).
Actually I think a blower would be a better boost technology for a gasoline tow vehicle. No need to spool up. Just linear boost from idle up. Plenty of kits have been on the market to add blowers to various engines. Huge gains are possible but the greater the gain the shorter the duty cycle. In fact variable boost would be easy so you could dial it up as needed.
The big HP muscle cars have blowers and the results are significant.
As the poster above stated... they have a boosted tow engine... its a diesel.
I have 2 V-10s in the fleet with 4.88 and 5.36 rears. They push and pull hard. I can imagine them with a supercharger being a monster.
But not desirable enough to sacrifice durability.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.