Notices
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis Econolines. E150, E250, E350, E450 and E550

Heads up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 30, 2019 | 08:11 AM
  #1  
Calvin Thomas's Avatar
Calvin Thomas
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Heads up

I have a 89 with the 4v intake manifold and I'd like to use it on my 91 with efi.
Are the heads the same? Will this manifold bolt to these heads?

I hate the efi in my 91, You can't hardly work in the engine bay. Plus my lower efi intake is damaged.
So I figured I can do a carb conversion instead of repairing the efi lower.
Then I would have room to work in there.
​​​​​​I need to know about the transmission.
What issues will I have.
I have the e4od in both vans but I'm sure there is something different between the two.
Thanks
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2019 | 02:50 PM
  #2  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
You'll do better replacing the EFI lower with a good part. Carbing it is going to get messy. The E4OD needs the computer to run it. Then there's sorting out all the wiring to see what needs to be there and what doesn't to run a carb. You'll also need a different fuel pump to feed a carb. The EFI pump puts out too much pressure and volume for a carb setup. You'd need to run a regulator and hook up the return line to it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2019 | 09:25 PM
  #3  
Spaznaut's Avatar
Spaznaut
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 7
From: NE Tennessee
'89 was fuel injected. What motor do you have? I second replacing the lower intake. There are stand-alone units for the e4od but your talking quite a bit more money with the fuel pressure and wiring issues then just a lower intake. Plus you'll need to buy a carburator/intake. Also a good running efi will be smoother than most any carb in varying conditions.
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2019 | 08:10 AM
  #4  
wirelessengineer's Avatar
wirelessengineer
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 784
Likes: 25
Originally Posted by baddad457
. The EFI pump puts out too much pressure and volume for a carb setup.
Heh. That would almost be funny to watch.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2020 | 02:16 PM
  #5  
Spaznaut's Avatar
Spaznaut
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 7
From: NE Tennessee
Moroso (spelling) makes a fuel log that uses your return line to drop down the pressure greatly.. I ran a carbed 351w with the fuel pump from my 4cylinder motor in my '87 mustang. Worked okay as long as you didn't try to turn 6 grand on the 351w. Worked good and didn't have to drop the tank.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2020 | 02:48 PM
  #6  
Calvin Thomas's Avatar
Calvin Thomas
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
The 89 has a 351w Ho in it. It runs great and I like it much better than the efi.
Plenty of room to work on and seems to be more responsive then the efi.
I also like the fact that I'm removing a lot of electronics that are getting more scarce to find.

I researched the distributor from Msi and there control module for the tranny.
I'm on the fence about using the intake off the 89 and buying a new carb.
Not building a hotrod but just a good running engine that's easy to work on. Old school.
I have thought about using a intake like the elderbrock performer but don't want to overload the cam.

If the heads are the same then I'm good to go but need to know first before I pull the green light.
Thanks guys I do appreciate the help
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2020 | 04:11 PM
  #7  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
Originally Posted by Calvin Thomas
I also like the fact that I'm removing a lot of electronics that are getting more scarce to find.
NOT SURE WHY YOU CAN'T FIND ELECTRONICS. THE SENSORS ARE AVAILABLE EVERYWHERE.
I'm on the fence about using the intake off the 89 and buying a new carb.
Not building a hotrod but just a good running engine that's easy to work on. Old school.
I have thought about using a intake like the elderbrock performer but don't want to overload the cam.
THIS MAKES NO SENSE EITHER. HOW ARE YOU GOING TO OVERLOAD THE CAM ?
If the heads are the same then I'm good to go but need to know first before I pull the green light.
Thanks guys I do appreciate the help
The heads are the same on both engines- E7TE's. It's not going to be a easy swap though. Been there-done that with a V8 89 Ranger. It'll be easier to just replace the lower intake.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2020 | 06:05 PM
  #8  
Calvin Thomas's Avatar
Calvin Thomas
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by baddad457
The heads are the same on both engines- E7TE's. It's not going to be a easy swap though. Been there-done that with a V8 89 Ranger. It'll be easier to just replace the lower intake.
What I mean about overloading the cam is adding to much carb and intake to where the engine wants to run better in the higher rpm instead of lower. Like adding a single plane intake which is better for high rpm.
I'll be running in the lower range so a dual plane intake will be better for me.

What type of problems did you have on the ranger swap?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 2, 2020 | 03:41 PM
  #9  
Calvin Thomas's Avatar
Calvin Thomas
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
89 was efi?
Now I'm searching this donor van for it's year.
It's stripped down pretty much, The only id I can find is the VIN. It's has 84 but not sure if that is the year
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2020 | 03:53 PM
  #10  
Calvin Thomas's Avatar
Calvin Thomas
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Found it 1987,. Geez
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2020 | 07:33 PM
  #11  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Calvin you will open a massive can of worms if you put a carb on that motor, the E4OD will not work without the computer and it needs some of the engine sensors like the MAP and TPS to operate correctly.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2020 | 07:48 PM
  #12  
Spaznaut's Avatar
Spaznaut
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 7
From: NE Tennessee
Okay was wondering because I had an '88 and it was efi. Why not grab the transmission from the donor van too if its there. For the amount of work your looking at you will get very little if any gains going from efi to carb unless your going to ramp up the power a bit. Not sure if the Aod had any controls on it from the computer. If you want more power you could just step up your efi a little with a computer friendly cam and steeper rear-end gears. Check out some Mustang forums for some ideas. The 460 forum is full of tuning the SD-fi enough to not mess up the computer. The 351w isn't any different. You are limited but unless your really wanting to step up the power you'd be fine with the EFI.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2020 | 08:05 PM
  #13  
Calvin Thomas's Avatar
Calvin Thomas
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Spaznaut
Okay was wondering because I had an '88 and it was efi. Why not grab the transmission from the donor van too if its there. For the amount of work your looking at you will get very little if any gains going from efi to carb unless your going to ramp up the power a bit. Not sure if the Aod had any controls on it from the computer. If you want more power you could just step up your efi a little with a computer friendly cam and steeper rear-end gears. Check out some Mustang forums for some ideas. The 460 forum is full of tuning the SD-fi enough to not mess up the computer. The 351w isn't any different. You are limited but unless your really wanting to step up the power you'd be fine with the EFI.
I'm actually thinking about doing that because my trans is having a slippage problem. I'll have the trans rebuilt before I install it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2020 | 08:08 PM
  #14  
Calvin Thomas's Avatar
Calvin Thomas
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Conanski
Calvin you will open a massive can of worms if you put a carb on that motor, the E4OD will not work without the computer and it needs some of the engine sensors like the MAP and TPS to operate correctly.
Msd, Makes a stand alone for this.
Which I need because I tow a 5000 pound camper and the shift points in the standard trans does not hold my gears long enough to keep from pulling the rpm down.
Basically the ecm I don't think after the swap will be doing anything as far as engine and trans control.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2020 | 08:20 PM
  #15  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
You're going to spend a pile of money and not see any performance improvements. The 351HO has a bigger cam in it that is why it feels more responsive, so that is what you should do to the '91 and then grab another lower intake from the junkyard and put it back together. All the smog junk can go away, the only thing that should remain is the EGR tube at the front passenger side, that will clean up the engine bay a lot. The cam to use is the Crane 444232.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE