Notices
1999 - 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Upgrade to 6.2L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2019 | 10:05 PM
  #1  
CsCross3's Avatar
CsCross3
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 74
Likes: 2
Upgrade to 6.2L

Hello all. I am looking to join the group of the 6.2 Super Duties. My reason for posting is because I need some help deciding what to do. I have several options to choose from, but I’m looking for a supercab shortbed F250 4x4. My choices are these: 2014 Lariat 3.73 with 150K miles, 2015 XLT 3.73 with 98K miles, and a 2013 XLT 4.30 with 80K miles. Now I’m looking to use the truck to feed hay and cattle cubes. It’ll have a flatbed spear bed and a cube feeder. I’m planning on this truck to be used for myself and not the family. It’ll be my tow rig, my daily driver, and my feed truck. It won’t be a family vehicle. So with that being said, what should I choose? Should I go with older, higher miles, and higher trim, or should I go with newer, lower miles, and a lower trim? How much of a difference does the 4.30 make compared to 3.73 with mileage, towing performance, rpm ranges, etc.? I’m planning to keep the truck until it quits or it becomes just not worth fixing. The lariat is really nice and drives well, but I don’t know how I feel about the mileage on it. It’s been taken care of better than either of the other two. It’s nice and clean with a straight body. You can tell it’s been in a garage all it’s life. The XLT’s are both in good shape with only minimal cosmetic issues and one has a small tear in the seat. That doesn’t bother me though because I’m planning to buy some really nice carhartt seat covers. In my opinion all three trucks would do the job fine, but what kind of longevity are we talking about with the 6.2L? What kind of towing performance are we talking about? How comfortable are these trucks to drive long distances in? I want to know everything you think about the 6.2L Super Duties basically. Thanks for reading!
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2019 | 05:53 AM
  #2  
Snocam's Avatar
Snocam
Cross-Country
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 99
Likes: 25
Assuming the 2013 is in good shape, no rust or anything, that's probably the truck I would prefer. I have a 2016 350 with the same body configuration and 3.73 gears. I love the truck. Handles a load great, plows snow really well. Only thing I'd change is the gearing. The 3.73s are good, and get the job done, but 4.30s would be better, especially for towing. Also, when buying used, I always like to find something with the lowest miles in my price range. The 6.2 is a great motor. I own 2 trucks with this mill and really enjoy the simple service routine. Good luck. Hope this helps.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2019 | 05:54 AM
  #3  
T diesel's Avatar
T diesel
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 12
I would post your questions in the 6.2 sub forum.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2019 | 09:23 AM
  #4  
Byrd.Dog's Avatar
Byrd.Dog
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 230
From: Amarillo, TX
No experience with the 6.2, but plenty of experience with feed pickups here - If you plan to tow ANYTHING, opt for the lower gear ratio. Flatbed & feeder already add a LOT of weight, plus a stock trailer will equal a gutless tow rig with 3.73 gears. Just a guess, but I'd bet peak torque on the 6.2 is fairly high on the tach.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2019 | 04:07 PM
  #5  
WWR's Avatar
WWR
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 509
Yep, 4.30s all the way. My '11 is an XL. I appreciate the rubber floors but I've still got everything we woulda considered "loaded" back in the day: pw, pdl, a/c, power & heated mirrors, keyless entry, cruise.

I prefer the front bench w folding center console over a dedicated console.

Bonus points if the 4.30 truck has a manual t-case (SOOO glad my '11 does!!!) or the driver-selectable rear locker.

The only 2 things I wouldn't mind having: power telescoping mirrors and heated seats (the latter is more for the gf but I'll use heated seats if they're there)

The ONLY thing I hate: Ford's stupidest, dumbest "toggle on/toggle off" turn signals. ****-eee-blay those things are.

The 6.2 is allegedly the new "half-million-mile motor." I imagine that's a stretch but I've seen 2V's hit 350k or more and supposedly the 6.2 is on par with that. I've only got 150k so I can't say. If it makes it just another 8000 it will have outlived my V10 3V abomination, so if we're setting the bar low......

The 6.2 loves bigger numbers on the tach - I flog mine all over Colorado in the summer and hold 5500 on climbs with a trailer and 4.30s. Allegedly it's just as happy at redline of 6k but psychologically I feel like staying a touch off redline is a good idea...no science to back that up, just personal preference/superstition

I rarely pull more than 10k -- if I were going to pull more than that at altitude I'd still go diesel. I feel like the 6.2 pulls about as well as my stock '97 7.3 (pre-intercooler), albeit at higher RPM's
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2019 | 08:24 PM
  #6  
nikerret's Avatar
nikerret
Mountain Pass
5 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 241
Likes: 12
From: Kansas
I would go with the 4.30 with the lowest miles. Easy choice. I don’t think there was much difference between 13, 14, or 15, except the year it was built.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2019 | 08:33 PM
  #7  
dieselfueladdict's Avatar
dieselfueladdict
Freshman User
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
I would get the one with the 4.30 ratio. We have a '15 with 4.30 gears and it does just fine feeding cattle. It has a bale bed on it and also pulls a 24ft stock trailer. The 6 speed matches up well to the 6.2, and you can lock out gears, or run it manual.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2019 | 08:36 PM
  #8  
dieselfueladdict's Avatar
dieselfueladdict
Freshman User
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Also to add in, if you want your seat covers to look like factory seats, go with Shear Comfort seat covers. I got OEM style ones, and they look exactly like the factory fabric. Evan down to the little airbag tag on the side.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Dec 19, 2019 | 09:39 PM
  #9  
Thejudge's Avatar
Thejudge
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 166
Likes: 1
Get the 4.30s!!

Wish I had em.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2019 | 09:49 AM
  #10  
johnfist's Avatar
johnfist
More Turbo
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 587
Likes: 6
Definitely going to follow the crowd with saying, since it's purely a work truck, you want those 4.30s and you want low miles. 6.2s are about average on lifespan, so 150k is, depending on maintenance, at least mid-life for that engine. 80K and you've still got another 80K to go before you'll hit major problems with proper upkeep.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2019 | 10:03 AM
  #11  
CsCross3's Avatar
CsCross3
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 74
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by dieselfueladdict
Also to add in, if you want your seat covers to look like factory seats, go with Shear Comfort seat covers. I got OEM style ones, and they look exactly like the factory fabric. Evan down to the little airbag tag on the side.
I appreciate this very much because this is the first I’ve heard of it. I will google these. May be cheaper than the carhartts.

My main concern with the 4.30 is the fact that mileage will be less, although it will definitely pull a trailer exceptionally well. I can feel it from the driver’s seat, just like I could feel the torque the very first time I drove my old 7.3. The 4.30’s are so hard to find in the configuration that I want. I test drive the 13, but they sold it right after I left. So now I’m down to the clean 150K mile Lariat, and the 15 XLT with 98K. Out of the two, the 15 seems to be cleaner and only driven in the city. I don’t think it’s ever seen a soft road in its life. It doesn’t even have a gooseneck hitch or anything. At the moment, the 15 has the upper hand, but regardless of this, they both have 3.73’s in the rear, and they both are manually locked in via the 4wd switch on the dash.

I'm guessing I’ll have 2500 lbs extra just in the bale bed, cube feeder, and ranch hand legend series full replacement on the front.

I tow probably once a month or so. So I’ll probably miss the 4.30’s and such more than I would like to. I’ve had 3 3/4 ton fords and they’ve all been very wonderful to me. I had a 94 with a 460, a 2000 with the 7.3 and an 05 6.0. All three had 3.73’s. I may not even recognize a difference between the 4.30’s and 3.73’s towing a trailer because I’ve never had one before.

Either way I’m going to end up with a super nice truck. Just wish either one of them had overloads, because that would be the deciding factor due to the rear end sag in these trucks.

I appreciate everyone’s’ replies. This is the reason why I can’t NOT come to this forum. Good people like yourselves.

Thanks
-Cade
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2019 | 12:34 PM
  #12  
Juneaudave's Avatar
Juneaudave
Senior User
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 179
Likes: 1
FWIW....I think you might want to keep looking for an F350....I don't thing a 350 would be much more in a 6.2 l, and payload, not pulling power, could be the issue for you.

Anyway, you can't hardly go wrong. .I really like the 6.2 on my 2015. It has so much more capability than the older 3/4 tons that I have had.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2019 | 05:26 PM
  #13  
Bugzilla46310's Avatar
Bugzilla46310
Fleet Mechanic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 672
From: DeMotte, IN
Ditto on the 4.3, even if you do not tow. When I test drove a 3.73 F350 before I ordered mine, I thought the rpm's were awful low for just normal driving.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2019 | 05:50 PM
  #14  
dieselfueladdict's Avatar
dieselfueladdict
Freshman User
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Originally Posted by Juneaudave
FWIW....I think you might want to keep looking for an F350....I don't thing a 350 would be much more in a 6.2 l, and payload, not pulling power, could be the issue for you.

Anyway, you can't hardly go wrong. .I really like the 6.2 on my 2015. It has so much more capability than the older 3/4 tons that I have had.
I agree. the only downside to a F350 (imo) would be finding one. They are hard to find with the 6.2.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2019 | 10:07 PM
  #15  
CsCross3's Avatar
CsCross3
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 74
Likes: 2
Deal Reached

I ended up choosing the 2015 XLT with 98K. It’s got the 10K payload package, FX4, supercab shortbed, power everything, plus the productivity screen on the dash. So far, I’ve averaged 16.7 mpg on the 150 mile trip home. I am very pleased with the capability of this truck. Even going up hills it won’t downshift to 5th. It’ll stay in 6th and hammer through even with the cruise on 65 and rpms around 1750 or so. The high end power is astounding honestly. You can definitely feel it when you hit those high rpm ranges. Mine downshifted from 6th to 3rd when I put the throttle to the floor. Coming from a 7.3 and 6.0, honestly I feel I’ve made the best decision I could’ve because I’m completely satisfied. I tried to find an F-350 for that extra weight, but everybody in my area only has the 6.7’s and that wasn’t really an option for me due to the price tag that comes with it. Nevertheless, the truck weighs exactly 7K pounds, so I have 3K pounds worth of breathing room. The bed will add 950, cube feeder will add 1200, ranch hand will add 300. So altogether I’ll be 600 pounds under max payload if it’s only me in the truck. I think I can live with that, because my 6.0 was weighing in at 10,600 with the 10K payload package, and I feel it had less power than this 6.2L. The truck handles really well on the road for the weight. Sometimes it gets a little squirrelly on the rear end when I hit a decent size hole, but that’s not new to me. It’s been a while since I’ve driven a super duty that wasn’t loaded with extra weight. But this 6.2L definitely has plenty of power and torque to go around.

I appreciate all the responses. Thank you.

-Cade
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE