Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

SD to MAF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2019 | 03:39 PM
  #16  
srsbjohnson's Avatar
srsbjohnson
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
I had planned on long tubes, Basani Y and single 3 inch exhaust, is 2.5 better? I can definitely do the 1.7's, any recommendations? Not sure if a bore is required yet but if so we will shoot for 9.5:1 compression target. Not sure about the heads, been looking for GT40's but I can only find the P's and I know headers suck for them. I am fine going this route as long as it will help with the torque issue. I can always round up the MAF parts and do that later when I run out of other things to do.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2019 | 04:01 PM
  #17  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by srsbjohnson
I had planned on long tubes, Basani Y and single 3 inch exhaust, is 2.5 better?
With lowend torque as the goal the idea is to maintain good exhaust air velocity which makes the most of what longtube headers are designed for... increasing cylinder scavenging, that is when the exhaust pulse from one cylinder helps pull the exhaust out of the next one in the pattern. The stock exhaust does have a 3" center section but there are sections in the Y pipe and cat back that are much smaller so the effective max flow volume is really low. With longtubes you're going to ditch all that and start over so pretty much anything you can put together with aftermarket parts will flow a lot better than the stock setup even with 2.5" pipe all the way through. With 3" pipe some or all of the gains longtubes should produce will be lost, really this size pipe should only be used on a max HP build.
Scoirpion rockers get good reviews, and Crane are also good.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2019 | 05:25 PM
  #18  
Scndsin's Avatar
Scndsin
FTE Chapter Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 12,344
Likes: 1,318
From: Central Mississippi
Club FTE Silver Member

I run a bassani Y (hooks to the JBAs perfect) 2.5 to 3" with a magna flow 3 chamber & 3" MF hi-flo cat. Runs out to ss mandrel bent over the axle MF "stock" late model ford diesel tailpipe.

Friends tell me it's great but it's a little "log-truckish" to me sometimes.

I'm sure it gives up a bit here & there, but is sure is sweet to work on when necessary.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2019 | 06:46 PM
  #19  
SPE's Avatar
SPE
Former Vendor
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 279
Likes: 3
From: Shawnee KS
Originally Posted by rla2005
Easy button: https://www.stinger-performance.com/store

They are a site sponsor
I like the way this guy thinks! It's likely overkill for your goals though as long as you run a SD friendly cam. I agree with the others that said to just keep it SD and build a combo that will work with that. Much cheaper and easier than the MAF swap.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2019 | 09:57 AM
  #20  
R&RFord's Avatar
R&RFord
Fleet Mechanic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 367
From: Candy Mountain
So, the bassani y pipe is designed to mate to stock located exhaust so you will not be able to use it with long tubes, but it should work with any shorty header meant to work with the stock y pipe. Long tubes are often recommended on the forum for torque but will require you to fabricate or have fabricated at least the forward portion of the exhaust. The advantage of long tubes over shorties in the 0 to 4000 rpm range is probably negligible, but if any one can show some dyno data to the contrary I would love to see it. In any case replacing the stock catalytic converter with a high flow version is recommended as this the next bottle neck in the stock set up after the manifolds. Most shorty headers make spark plug replacement more difficult, and depending on the design they can be difficult to install/remove in the vehicle.

I think a set of pedestal mount 1.7 roller rockers is a no brainer. I used the Crane Cam Engergizers, which were used as factory parts by Ford for a time.

GT40 heads would be nice a upgrade over the stock E7's, but not really necessary. You can buy rebuilt units from Summit, under the Vege brand part number 2FX1. I would have them checked out by a machine shop before installing. They pop up second hand but they are not as plentiful as the P's as you have seen.

Leave the stock truck roller cam alone. It is a good torque cam.

You can install a better intake manifold, like a GT40 style intake from a Lightning or the Edelbrock 3881 but the price vs. improvement makes them hard to swallow. I have a 3881 installed on my truck and have been very pleased.

If you did everything above you will be pushing the limits of the fuel injectors and possibly the stock trucks computer ability to adapt. I think you could skip the heads and have a pretty sweet set up, or skip the heads and intake and still have a good improvement over stock. Just having a fresh engine will probably be big improvement for you.

Looking forward to seeing another build.

 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2019 | 12:23 PM
  #21  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by R&RFord
The advantage of long tubes over shorties in the 0 to 4000 rpm range is probably negligible, but if any one can show some dyno data to the contrary I would love to see it.
And the myth persists, I have seen dyno tests that clearly show this but I can't put my finger on it at the moment, Longtubes generate more output at both low and high rpms while shorties produce most gains at midrange rpms, on the exact same motor shorties do beat longtubes in the 3-4000rpm range. The thing is, these truck engines only have a 0-3500/4000rpm powerband so they won't ever utilize one of the 2 areas where longtubes perform best up at 5-6000rpm, but that just happens to be right where shorties work best. And I think almost without exception everybody that installs a full exhaust system on these trucks goes too big(I did), these motors just don't move that much air and bigger exhaust volume does hurt the bottom of the powerband where these engines spend most of tier time. But I have done several system on both the 5.0 and 5.8 and the very best working examples were the smallest.. not the biggest.

Originally Posted by R&RFord
Most shorty headers make spark plug replacement more difficult, and depending on the design they can be difficult to install/remove in the vehicle..
Equal length shorties are the worst for this but standard shorties are no worse than longtubes in most cases. My experience overall with headers and plug access is positive, you might need a wire set with angled boots but that is it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2019 | 03:51 PM
  #22  
srsbjohnson's Avatar
srsbjohnson
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
"GT40 heads would be nice a upgrade over the stock E7's, but not really necessary. You can buy rebuilt units from Summit, under the Vege brand part number 2FX1. I would have them checked out by a machine shop before installing. They pop up second hand but they are not as plentiful as the P's as you have seen."

I found these heads on Ebay at of all places, Autozone. They are selling for $202 each and no core charges or returns.

"If you did everything above you will be pushing the limits of the fuel injectors and possibly the stock trucks computer ability to adapt. I think you could skip the heads and have a pretty sweet set up, or skip the heads and intake and still have a good improvement over stock. Just having a fresh engine will probably be big improvement for you."

I plan to keep my factory intake so will the GT40 heads and 1.7 rockers be ok for the Speed Density? I am going to run the long tube headers and single exhaust as well and all smog has been deleted before I got the Bronco. Everything else will be stock.

Thanks

 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2019 | 05:51 PM
  #23  
R&RFord's Avatar
R&RFord
Fleet Mechanic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 367
From: Candy Mountain
I think you should be okay using the stock SD computer, assuming you stick with the factory roller cam.

On the subject of smog equipment - You want the EGR system intact and functioning. If you delete the catalytic converter or replace it with a modern one that does not need air injection deleting the factory air injection system is easy and there is no functional reason to retain it.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-2

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-7

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 20, 2019 | 06:03 PM
  #24  
srsbjohnson's Avatar
srsbjohnson
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Yes I would use the stock cam and the EGR is still there but the smog pump and converters were already gone. Where is a good place to get a stock cam or will i be able to reuse mine with 161k miles?
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2019 | 08:27 PM
  #25  
torq'ta 5 8's Avatar
torq'ta 5 8
Lead Driver
5 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 5,086
Likes: 869
From: N.W. Alabama
Originally Posted by srsbjohnson
I plan to keep my factory intake so will the GT40 heads and 1.7 rockers be ok for the Speed Density? I am going to run the long tube headers and single exhaust as well and all smog has been deleted before I got the Bronco. Everything else will be stock.
Thanks
yes, it will
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2019 | 05:31 PM
  #26  
R&RFord's Avatar
R&RFord
Fleet Mechanic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 367
From: Candy Mountain
Originally Posted by srsbjohnson
Yes I would use the stock cam and the EGR is still there but the smog pump and converters were already gone. Where is a good place to get a stock cam or will i be able to reuse mine with 161k miles?
If the engine was running pretty well, the cam is likely to be okay to reuse, but there are so many factors involved no one can say until you remove and inspect it. You or your machinist should inspect cam lobes and bearing surfaces carefully. Minor imperfections can be polished out but anything major will probably warrant replacement. If you need a replacement I know Sealed Power and Melling make an equivalent but I couldn't comment on the quality.

If it turns out you need or want a new cam Conanski is the one to get advice from. There may be a good off the shelf cam that would be a small upgrade.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2019 | 03:27 PM
  #27  
srsbjohnson's Avatar
srsbjohnson
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Okay, I got a chance to take my cam to the machine shop today and he said that everything looked good except for 1 bearing journal. He is going to try to polish it out but just incase he can't, what would be a good replacement Mr. Conanski? I'm fine with stock specs but not sure which one to buy.

Thanks
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2019 | 09:36 PM
  #28  
CZ Eddie's Avatar
CZ Eddie
Mountain Pass
5 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 165
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by rla2005
Easy button: https://www.stinger-performance.com/store

They are a site sponsor
Whoah. If I'm reading this right, the engine computer is $800 but if you have an E40D auto tranny then you also need the $1500 tranny computer. $2300 vs MAF... I'd go MAF.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2019 | 11:36 PM
  #29  
Scndsin's Avatar
Scndsin
FTE Chapter Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 12,344
Likes: 1,318
From: Central Mississippi
Club FTE Silver Member

No, stand alone programmable EFI without trans control is $800 & $1500 is with trans control, not an additional.

If you go out & price a programmable stand alone EFI of any type & then add a stand alone trans controler it's well above $1500.

Plus there is zero systems that directly plug in this gen truck.

The Stinger is a game changer for OBS EEC-IV trucks.
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2019 | 06:18 PM
  #30  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
The Comp Cams 35-512-8 is roughly equivalent to the stock cam with 1.7 rockers.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 AM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE