2017+ Super Duty The 2017+ Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty Pickup and Chassis Cab

2020 Diesel numbers are in!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 09-26-2019, 06:11 PM
maxum96's Avatar
maxum96
maxum96 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I pull a 36' long 5th wheel that weighs 15,500 full loaded over the Continental Divide here in Colorado. That means I'm towing up mountain passes that exceed 11,000' in altitude. I used to tow my trailer with my 2006 F350 with the 6.0 and that truck slowed down a bit on the passes. I now have a 2019 F350 with the 6.7. The torque and power is amazing when towing. Not even pushing the truck I can easily drive the speed limit on the highways on those passes. I personally can't see where I'd need another 115 ft lbs of torque while towing.
 
  #32  
Old 09-26-2019, 06:30 PM
hansenlink's Avatar
hansenlink
hansenlink is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 227
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts
A bit disappointed as well. With all the engine upgrades and new tranny I believe they could have hit the 500 hp and 1100 ft/ilb without issue. I think they are sandbagging and will provide this in a year or two with the SAME engine. Also the torque better not be limited in lower gears as I have seen it is not in the GMC. So that would be a major faux pas in my opinion.
 
  #33  
Old 09-26-2019, 06:41 PM
Sasha4's Avatar
Sasha4
Sasha4 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Well they wanted to beat Ram... Box checked
 
  #34  
Old 09-26-2019, 06:50 PM
George C's Avatar
George C
George C is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: WNY
Posts: 2,866
Received 504 Likes on 294 Posts
Originally Posted by hansenlink
A bit disappointed as well. With all the engine upgrades and new tranny I believe they could have hit the 500 hp and 1100 ft/ilb without issue. I think they are sandbagging and will provide this in a year or two with the SAME engine. Also the torque better not be limited in lower gears as I have seen it is not in the GMC. So that would be a major faux pas in my opinion.
Disappointed...that’s funny...

If the right internals and fuel volume potentials are there.. like the old 6.4L to make 1,200+ , expect the tuners to make it available by spring.
 
  #35  
Old 09-26-2019, 06:58 PM
V10DoubleTow's Avatar
V10DoubleTow
V10DoubleTow is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Somewhere west of Arizona
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by BigTexDiesal
2017 6.7L MSRP was $8795. 2020 6.7L $10,495 a 20% increase in price for torque 98% will not use and a new 10 speed transmission with growing pains as we know FORD has QC issues. If you can get a smoking deal on a 2019 and save $5-7k over a 2020 I would do it in a heartbeat.....
That extra $1,700 is going into Ford's warranty liability account. They may need it.
 
  #36  
Old 09-26-2019, 07:22 PM
2013xlt's Avatar
2013xlt
2013xlt is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 144
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by hansenlink
A bit disappointed as well. With all the engine upgrades and new tranny I believe they could have hit the 500 hp and 1100 ft/ilb without issue. I think they are sandbagging and will provide this in a year or two with the SAME engine. Also the torque better not be limited in lower gears as I have seen it is not in the GMC. So that would be a major faux pas in my opinion.
The new GM's are torque limited contrary to the info that has been released saying that they're is no torque management. The Ram with the aisin transmission has no torque management at all but it de-fuels heavily between shifts. The ford is almost guaranteed to have torque limited as the 10 speed is still a "140" and the current 6r140 isn't enough with the 2019 power rating to not be torque managed, let alone a 25hp and 115ft lbs jump.
 
  #37  
Old 09-26-2019, 07:30 PM
ForCal's Avatar
ForCal
ForCal is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 4,064
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
So, do we know all the other numbers, like GVWR, tow ratings etc. on various model/motor combos?
 
  #38  
Old 09-26-2019, 07:55 PM
hansenlink's Avatar
hansenlink
hansenlink is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 227
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by George C
Disappointed...that’s funny...

If the right internals and fuel volume potentials are there.. like the old 6.4L to make 1,200+ , expect the tuners to make it available by spring.

Missed the point entirely. I am not interested in TUNED anything. I am speaking of factory warranty numbers.
 
  #39  
Old 09-26-2019, 08:12 PM
RedRage's Avatar
RedRage
RedRage is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calhan, CO
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Those are great numbers until...

2022 when it will be 1100 lb/ft and 525 hp . It will never end.
 
  #40  
Old 09-26-2019, 08:36 PM
17 Oaks's Avatar
17 Oaks
17 Oaks is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 3,775
Received 139 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by 640 CI Aluminum FORD
25mpg freeway ''might'' be doable unloaded with a diesel, but you won't see that from either of the gas engines, and 20mpg+ fully loaded is a pipe dream regardless of whats under the hood, we'll likely have electric trucks before we ever see 20mpg+ out of a fully loaded down internal combustion engine truck. As far as the torque rating goes, its mostly just to win the numbers game, Ford, GM and Ram all have a hard on for having the highest numbers, be it towing, payload, horsepower or torque. I'm almost certain that torque is electronically limited in first gear to prevent shock load damage on the driveline, but its entirely possible it's limited in other gears as well.
That big D will give you 25mpg, I can get 21-22 out of my '19...yes I do! BUT, I leave my place at 1712 ft El and drive to San Antonio at 600 ft El, about 30 mi so I am driving downhill.

Then there is another problem, 6-8 thousand lbs of Barn Door...errr Truck...its the truck that holds you back, not the engine.

Example: '03 Jeep Rubicon OEM, 6 sp, 4:10 gears 16+ mpg on hwy day in day out: Ordered some parts for it from a machine shop just off I 35 S of Ok border, I am in Ft Worth. I had removed my roll cage and as a result, the windshield was down. I get call late afternoon, they have my parts ready,m but will be closed on Sat for Labor Day. I look at my watch and I can just make it. Jump in Jeep, no roll bars, windshield down, drive over to I 35 and fill with gas, head out. I make it, pick up parts and turn S to home. Get to my exit and look at the gas gage, the needle has barely moved...cannot be, should have used almost half a tank. I pull into the same gas station and same pump. Top tank as always and compute gals to miles driven...26.3 mpg.

NO BARN DOOR!
 
  #41  
Old 09-26-2019, 09:23 PM
Norris McCarty's Avatar
Norris McCarty
Norris McCarty is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 150
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Wow....21-22mpg.....you need to teach me how to drive! And that’s not flat land you’re talking about......even though the elevation change! You’re friggin amazing.17 oaks!
 
  #42  
Old 09-26-2019, 09:42 PM
zekes66's Avatar
zekes66
zekes66 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by davidpacificnw
the real question I have with the engine specs is the 6,2 to 7.3 torque numbers. You need to get to 4000 rpms to get to the max torque on the 7.3L and only 3800 to get to 430 ft-lb of torque. Wonder how that looks with both engines at 3800 RPMs on a torque curve graph? Seems the 7.3L is not offering much. anyone know what the price difference is. Early in the year, pre numbers announcement, I figured $1500-$2000 IIRC. NOW, I'd be surprised if it was $500 difference. Not sure you'd notice much difference between the 6.2L and 7.3l with a load.

The thing about the 7.3 is the torque curve. Or the lack of one. Just off idle it has 400 lbs of torque and goes up from there. I think its going to sell huge.
 
  #43  
Old 09-26-2019, 10:31 PM
Desert Don's Avatar
Desert Don
Desert Don is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 9,430
Received 4,675 Likes on 1,658 Posts
Originally Posted by davidpacificnw
the real question I have with the engine specs is the 6,2 to 7.3 torque numbers. You need to get to 4000 rpms to get to the max torque on the 7.3L and only 3800 to get to 430 ft-lb of torque. Wonder how that looks with both engines at 3800 RPMs on a torque curve graph? Seems the 7.3L is not offering much. anyone know what the price difference is. Early in the year, pre numbers announcement, I figured $1500-$2000 IIRC. NOW, I'd be surprised if it was $500 difference. Not sure you'd notice much difference between the 6.2L and 7.3l with a load.
If’n ya want a gasser to give ya a real woody, mebee this is what ya need!!!!!!!! LOL

The Ford GAA engine is an American all-aluminum 32-valve DOHC 60-degree V8 engine engineered and produced by the Ford Motor Company just before, and during, World War II. It features twin Stromberg NA-Y5-G carburetors,[2] dual magnetos and twin spark plugs making up a full dual ignitionsystem,[2] and crossflow induction.[3] It displaces 1,100 cu in (18 l) and puts out well over 1,000 pound-feet (1,400 N⋅m) of torque from idle to 2,200 rpm. The factory-rated output was 500 hp (370 kW) at 2,600 rpm.
 
  #44  
Old 09-26-2019, 10:33 PM
Coghlin's Avatar
Coghlin
Coghlin is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
They need to stop worrying about tow ratings and tq. I bought the f450 because I tow heavy but enough is enough. Pretty hard to find a trailer that is rated for the weight these trucks are. Any heavier tow rating and you should be having a heavier unit pulling it. I am more concerned about fuel mileage for my business. The ford is the worst of the big three. I was hoping with good driving habits I could do well but I am plain disappointed in the ford. It burns 20% more
fuel than the dodge pulling the same trailer with the same driver. I even tried dropping my speed down and running in manual mode to avoid downshifting and upshifting earlier which did help but it is hurting my bottom line. Very happy with the capability of the f450. The brakes and front axle are amazing but I think more thought needs to be put to fuel efficiency. I drove a new class 8 truck with a gcvw of 60000lbs and got within 1mpg of my ford at 34000 lbs. The class 8 trucks all compete for best mpg but that seems to be lost in the pickup wars. Makes it hard for business owners like myself who use the pickups everyday for work.
 
  #45  
Old 09-26-2019, 10:43 PM
Desert Don's Avatar
Desert Don
Desert Don is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 9,430
Received 4,675 Likes on 1,658 Posts
Originally Posted by Coghlin
They need to stop worrying about tow ratings and tq. I bought the f450 because I tow heavy but enough is enough. Pretty hard to find a trailer that is rated for the weight these trucks are. Any heavier tow rating and you should be having a heavier unit pulling it. I am more concerned about fuel mileage for my business. The ford is the worst of the big three. I was hoping with good driving habits I could do well but I am plain disappointed in the ford. It burns 20% more
fuel than the dodge pulling the same trailer with the same driver. I even tried dropping my speed down and running in manual mode to avoid downshifting and upshifting earlier which did help but it is hurting my bottom line. Very happy with the capability of the f450. The brakes and front axle are amazing but I think more thought needs to be put to fuel efficiency. I drove a new class 8 truck with a gcvw of 60000lbs and got within 1mpg of my ford at 34000 lbs. The class 8 trucks all compete for best mpg but that seems to be lost in the pickup wars. Makes it hard for business owners like myself who use the pickups everyday for work.
And I find the opposite to be true......somewhat. Running without a load the Ram does a little better than the Fords, but loaded the Fords do a little better than the Ram. Same load, same roads, same speeds, same conditions, same driver (ME). It comes out kind of a wash.
 


Quick Reply: 2020 Diesel numbers are in!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 AM.