2020 Diesel numbers are in!!!
#31
I pull a 36' long 5th wheel that weighs 15,500 full loaded over the Continental Divide here in Colorado. That means I'm towing up mountain passes that exceed 11,000' in altitude. I used to tow my trailer with my 2006 F350 with the 6.0 and that truck slowed down a bit on the passes. I now have a 2019 F350 with the 6.7. The torque and power is amazing when towing. Not even pushing the truck I can easily drive the speed limit on the highways on those passes. I personally can't see where I'd need another 115 ft lbs of torque while towing.
#32
A bit disappointed as well. With all the engine upgrades and new tranny I believe they could have hit the 500 hp and 1100 ft/ilb without issue. I think they are sandbagging and will provide this in a year or two with the SAME engine. Also the torque better not be limited in lower gears as I have seen it is not in the GMC. So that would be a major faux pas in my opinion.
#34
A bit disappointed as well. With all the engine upgrades and new tranny I believe they could have hit the 500 hp and 1100 ft/ilb without issue. I think they are sandbagging and will provide this in a year or two with the SAME engine. Also the torque better not be limited in lower gears as I have seen it is not in the GMC. So that would be a major faux pas in my opinion.
If the right internals and fuel volume potentials are there.. like the old 6.4L to make 1,200+ , expect the tuners to make it available by spring.
#35
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Somewhere west of Arizona
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
7 Posts
2017 6.7L MSRP was $8795. 2020 6.7L $10,495 a 20% increase in price for torque 98% will not use and a new 10 speed transmission with growing pains as we know FORD has QC issues. If you can get a smoking deal on a 2019 and save $5-7k over a 2020 I would do it in a heartbeat.....
#36
A bit disappointed as well. With all the engine upgrades and new tranny I believe they could have hit the 500 hp and 1100 ft/ilb without issue. I think they are sandbagging and will provide this in a year or two with the SAME engine. Also the torque better not be limited in lower gears as I have seen it is not in the GMC. So that would be a major faux pas in my opinion.
#38
Missed the point entirely. I am not interested in TUNED anything. I am speaking of factory warranty numbers.
#40
25mpg freeway ''might'' be doable unloaded with a diesel, but you won't see that from either of the gas engines, and 20mpg+ fully loaded is a pipe dream regardless of whats under the hood, we'll likely have electric trucks before we ever see 20mpg+ out of a fully loaded down internal combustion engine truck. As far as the torque rating goes, its mostly just to win the numbers game, Ford, GM and Ram all have a hard on for having the highest numbers, be it towing, payload, horsepower or torque. I'm almost certain that torque is electronically limited in first gear to prevent shock load damage on the driveline, but its entirely possible it's limited in other gears as well.
Then there is another problem, 6-8 thousand lbs of Barn Door...errr Truck...its the truck that holds you back, not the engine.
Example: '03 Jeep Rubicon OEM, 6 sp, 4:10 gears 16+ mpg on hwy day in day out: Ordered some parts for it from a machine shop just off I 35 S of Ok border, I am in Ft Worth. I had removed my roll cage and as a result, the windshield was down. I get call late afternoon, they have my parts ready,m but will be closed on Sat for Labor Day. I look at my watch and I can just make it. Jump in Jeep, no roll bars, windshield down, drive over to I 35 and fill with gas, head out. I make it, pick up parts and turn S to home. Get to my exit and look at the gas gage, the needle has barely moved...cannot be, should have used almost half a tank. I pull into the same gas station and same pump. Top tank as always and compute gals to miles driven...26.3 mpg.
NO BARN DOOR!
#42
the real question I have with the engine specs is the 6,2 to 7.3 torque numbers. You need to get to 4000 rpms to get to the max torque on the 7.3L and only 3800 to get to 430 ft-lb of torque. Wonder how that looks with both engines at 3800 RPMs on a torque curve graph? Seems the 7.3L is not offering much. anyone know what the price difference is. Early in the year, pre numbers announcement, I figured $1500-$2000 IIRC. NOW, I'd be surprised if it was $500 difference. Not sure you'd notice much difference between the 6.2L and 7.3l with a load.
The thing about the 7.3 is the torque curve. Or the lack of one. Just off idle it has 400 lbs of torque and goes up from there. I think its going to sell huge.
#43
the real question I have with the engine specs is the 6,2 to 7.3 torque numbers. You need to get to 4000 rpms to get to the max torque on the 7.3L and only 3800 to get to 430 ft-lb of torque. Wonder how that looks with both engines at 3800 RPMs on a torque curve graph? Seems the 7.3L is not offering much. anyone know what the price difference is. Early in the year, pre numbers announcement, I figured $1500-$2000 IIRC. NOW, I'd be surprised if it was $500 difference. Not sure you'd notice much difference between the 6.2L and 7.3l with a load.
The Ford GAA engine is an American all-aluminum 32-valve DOHC 60-degree V8 engine engineered and produced by the Ford Motor Company just before, and during, World War II. It features twin Stromberg NA-Y5-G carburetors,[2] dual magnetos and twin spark plugs making up a full dual ignitionsystem,[2] and crossflow induction.[3] It displaces 1,100 cu in (18 l) and puts out well over 1,000 pound-feet (1,400 N⋅m) of torque from idle to 2,200 rpm. The factory-rated output was 500 hp (370 kW) at 2,600 rpm.
#44
They need to stop worrying about tow ratings and tq. I bought the f450 because I tow heavy but enough is enough. Pretty hard to find a trailer that is rated for the weight these trucks are. Any heavier tow rating and you should be having a heavier unit pulling it. I am more concerned about fuel mileage for my business. The ford is the worst of the big three. I was hoping with good driving habits I could do well but I am plain disappointed in the ford. It burns 20% more
fuel than the dodge pulling the same trailer with the same driver. I even tried dropping my speed down and running in manual mode to avoid downshifting and upshifting earlier which did help but it is hurting my bottom line. Very happy with the capability of the f450. The brakes and front axle are amazing but I think more thought needs to be put to fuel efficiency. I drove a new class 8 truck with a gcvw of 60000lbs and got within 1mpg of my ford at 34000 lbs. The class 8 trucks all compete for best mpg but that seems to be lost in the pickup wars. Makes it hard for business owners like myself who use the pickups everyday for work.
fuel than the dodge pulling the same trailer with the same driver. I even tried dropping my speed down and running in manual mode to avoid downshifting and upshifting earlier which did help but it is hurting my bottom line. Very happy with the capability of the f450. The brakes and front axle are amazing but I think more thought needs to be put to fuel efficiency. I drove a new class 8 truck with a gcvw of 60000lbs and got within 1mpg of my ford at 34000 lbs. The class 8 trucks all compete for best mpg but that seems to be lost in the pickup wars. Makes it hard for business owners like myself who use the pickups everyday for work.
#45
They need to stop worrying about tow ratings and tq. I bought the f450 because I tow heavy but enough is enough. Pretty hard to find a trailer that is rated for the weight these trucks are. Any heavier tow rating and you should be having a heavier unit pulling it. I am more concerned about fuel mileage for my business. The ford is the worst of the big three. I was hoping with good driving habits I could do well but I am plain disappointed in the ford. It burns 20% more
fuel than the dodge pulling the same trailer with the same driver. I even tried dropping my speed down and running in manual mode to avoid downshifting and upshifting earlier which did help but it is hurting my bottom line. Very happy with the capability of the f450. The brakes and front axle are amazing but I think more thought needs to be put to fuel efficiency. I drove a new class 8 truck with a gcvw of 60000lbs and got within 1mpg of my ford at 34000 lbs. The class 8 trucks all compete for best mpg but that seems to be lost in the pickup wars. Makes it hard for business owners like myself who use the pickups everyday for work.
fuel than the dodge pulling the same trailer with the same driver. I even tried dropping my speed down and running in manual mode to avoid downshifting and upshifting earlier which did help but it is hurting my bottom line. Very happy with the capability of the f450. The brakes and front axle are amazing but I think more thought needs to be put to fuel efficiency. I drove a new class 8 truck with a gcvw of 60000lbs and got within 1mpg of my ford at 34000 lbs. The class 8 trucks all compete for best mpg but that seems to be lost in the pickup wars. Makes it hard for business owners like myself who use the pickups everyday for work.