High Performance 6.7s
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
High Performance 6.7s
Was just browsing the gram and found no limit has a triple turbo 6.7 that made 1300ish hp. I also know that Snyder Performance Engineering has a triple turbo 6.7 (1800hp) and Maryland Performance Diesel has some high horsepower trucks. I was wondering how many other people are really pushing these engines up into 1000+ hp or if anybody has more info on these trucks? I love that people exploring these engine limits hopefully pushing them to compete with those cummins.
Thanks
Thanks
FTE Legend
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 31,962
Likes: 9,194
From: Western NY
You're best bet is to probably to stick with social media to see the high performance stuff. But check out the diesel performance section here. There's another shop in PA also. I'll think of it later.
Mainly daily drivers here.
Mainly daily drivers here.
Tuned
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 391
Likes: 18
From: Calhan, CO
Limits
The Cummins will always have a torque advantage because of the long stroke. But as RPM increases, the long stroke becomes a liability.
Fords 6.7 is capable of incredible amounts of power. The stock con rods got a bad rep early on but most of that was poor tuning. I'm well over
1000 hp on the stock rods with no failures. I won't get into details but lets just say don't bring on the fuel and timing too early. Instead of using
rpm in the torque/horsepower graphs, use piston speed instead and you will get a much more accurate picture.
Joe
Fords 6.7 is capable of incredible amounts of power. The stock con rods got a bad rep early on but most of that was poor tuning. I'm well over
1000 hp on the stock rods with no failures. I won't get into details but lets just say don't bring on the fuel and timing too early. Instead of using
rpm in the torque/horsepower graphs, use piston speed instead and you will get a much more accurate picture.
Joe
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
The Cummins will always have a torque advantage because of the long stroke. But as RPM increases, the long stroke becomes a liability.
Fords 6.7 is capable of incredible amounts of power. The stock con rods got a bad rep early on but most of that was poor tuning. I'm well over
1000 hp on the stock rods with no failures. I won't get into details but lets just say don't bring on the fuel and timing too early. Instead of using
rpm in the torque/horsepower graphs, use piston speed instead and you will get a much more accurate picture.
Joe
Fords 6.7 is capable of incredible amounts of power. The stock con rods got a bad rep early on but most of that was poor tuning. I'm well over
1000 hp on the stock rods with no failures. I won't get into details but lets just say don't bring on the fuel and timing too early. Instead of using
rpm in the torque/horsepower graphs, use piston speed instead and you will get a much more accurate picture.
Joe
FTE Legend
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 31,962
Likes: 9,194
From: Western NY
The Cummins will always have a torque advantage because of the long stroke. But as RPM increases, the long stroke becomes a liability.
Fords 6.7 is capable of incredible amounts of power. The stock con rods got a bad rep early on but most of that was poor tuning. I'm well over
1000 hp on the stock rods with no failures. I won't get into details but lets just say don't bring on the fuel and timing too early. Instead of using
rpm in the torque/horsepower graphs, use piston speed instead and you will get a much more accurate picture.
Joe
Fords 6.7 is capable of incredible amounts of power. The stock con rods got a bad rep early on but most of that was poor tuning. I'm well over
1000 hp on the stock rods with no failures. I won't get into details but lets just say don't bring on the fuel and timing too early. Instead of using
rpm in the torque/horsepower graphs, use piston speed instead and you will get a much more accurate picture.
Joe
Trending Topics
FTE Legend
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 31,962
Likes: 9,194
From: Western NY
, I'd want to have something totally different like 11 to 16 chassis, 6.7 6r140 with a F350CCSB body custom mounted on top with modern interior. Like something the Diesel Brothers would do. But I digress.
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now
Brett Foote
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals
Joe Kucinski
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership
Brett Foote
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches
Pouria Savadkouei
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained
Brett Foote
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Verdad Gallardo
Tuned
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 391
Likes: 18
From: Calhan, CO
I can't
Some of the methods and procedures are proprietary, so that is as far as I ca go.
I used to worry about the rods, now I appreciate their design. The new rods that came out in 2017 are wider
but are made a lot cheaper. I question their overall strength. The old rods were designed by Mahle and the new
ones are made by AAM. That also concerns me some what.
I used to worry about the rods, now I appreciate their design. The new rods that came out in 2017 are wider
but are made a lot cheaper. I question their overall strength. The old rods were designed by Mahle and the new
ones are made by AAM. That also concerns me some what.
FTE Legend
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 31,962
Likes: 9,194
From: Western NY
No worries... I get it.
No problem man. I understand. Not looking for details. But I'll assume compounds, bigger intake and bigger injectors. I probably am wrong but what do I know?? So I started looking for hipo 6.7s and found this one from SPE.
You won?t believe what this Powerstroke can do on Diesel alone!
Cool stuff.
You won?t believe what this Powerstroke can do on Diesel alone!
Cool stuff.
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Some of the methods and procedures are proprietary, so that is as far as I ca go.
I used to worry about the rods, now I appreciate their design. The new rods that came out in 2017 are wider
but are made a lot cheaper. I question their overall strength. The old rods were designed by Mahle and the new
ones are made by AAM. That also concerns me some what.
I used to worry about the rods, now I appreciate their design. The new rods that came out in 2017 are wider
but are made a lot cheaper. I question their overall strength. The old rods were designed by Mahle and the new
ones are made by AAM. That also concerns me some what.
https://www.spediesel.com/blogs/blog/2020-ford-super-duty-6-7l-engine-specs
Here is something from SPE where they go over the new changes happening to the 6.7.
Tuned
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 391
Likes: 18
From: Calhan, CO
Rods
The new rods are pm. They are also a direct replacement (superseded by) for the old rod going back to mid 2016. As long as it uses the 35mm wrist pin. For that to work, the new and old rod
would have to weigh the same. The clincher is the new rod is $29 vs the old rod being $99. What does the price difference tell us? Something maybe. I'm not sure.
All of my information pertains to the 6.7 from 2016.5 thru 2019. 2020, I have no idea.
would have to weigh the same. The clincher is the new rod is $29 vs the old rod being $99. What does the price difference tell us? Something maybe. I'm not sure.
All of my information pertains to the 6.7 from 2016.5 thru 2019. 2020, I have no idea.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hayfarmer
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
1
Mar 5, 2007 05:36 PM
bigtorque
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
4
Nov 22, 2006 07:10 AM
Tony G
Supercharger, Turbocharger, Nitrous Oxide & Water/Methanol Injection
73
Jun 21, 2005 11:18 PM