Notices
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

Fuel Sending Unit - Issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2018 | 06:11 PM
  #31  
Gigemags05's Avatar
Gigemags05
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Denton, TX
I tested the sending unit and it’s at 75 ohms on full and 12 on empty, so it’s pretty spot on.

when the unit is working out of the tank, it IS grounded to the chassis, same spot as when in the tank.

A grounding issue is all i can think of too. I just don’t see how it’s grounding. The float seems to work just fine.

Im going to put it in a bucket of water and see what happens.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2018 | 04:52 PM
  #32  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,980
Likes: 2,735
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Gigemags05


when the unit is working out of the tank, it IS grounded to the chassis, same spot as when in the tank.
So you have a wire bolted to the sending unit, and have it run over to the truck somewhere and bolted to the truck for a ground?

 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2018 | 05:37 PM
  #33  
Gigemags05's Avatar
Gigemags05
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Denton, TX
Yes,
I have a wire attached to the ground terminal on the sending unit and it is bolted to the chassis crossmember right next to it. Clean ground, no rust or paint in the way.

Today I got a bucket of water and tested the sending unit...works perfectly in the bucket, float is working great, gauge reads accurately.

I re-installed the sending unit and the gauge still reads empty at all times. I ran a ground from the gauge to the sending unit and chassis at the same time, no change.

I am absolutely dumbfounded. There has to be some issue with the tank that I am not able to put my finger on.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2018 | 05:43 PM
  #34  
ctubutis's Avatar
ctubutis
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 22,415
Likes: 92
From: Denver Metro Area, CO
Club FTE Gold Member
Or maybe a damaged/broken wire in the wiring harness that doesn't flow electricity when in certain positions? Kinda grasping at straws here, this is an odd situation....
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2018 | 06:15 PM
  #35  
Gigemags05's Avatar
Gigemags05
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Denton, TX
I completely agree, grasping for straws is about all I have left.

So since I am now the proud owner of two sending units, I installed the new one and used an angle finder to gauge what angle it sits in the tank. Its 45 degrees. I then used the second sender and held it at 45 degrees in the bucket of water and wired it. I had my wife sit in the cab and read the gauge to me. It was dead on accurate. Moved to full when I lifted the float, moved to empty when I pushed it, etc.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2018 | 06:24 PM
  #36  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by ctubutis
Or maybe a damaged/broken wire in the wiring harness that doesn't flow electricity when in certain positions? Kinda grasping at straws here, this is an odd situation....
The OP bought a "gypo" aftermarket sending unit (probably made in China). Lawd only knows if it's compatible or not.

Post #9: There are 88 of the genuine Ford sending units available NOS .. I didn't list the sources, but I will if asked, but only some of them.
 

Last edited by NumberDummy; Sep 26, 2018 at 06:28 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2018 | 06:33 PM
  #37  
Gigemags05's Avatar
Gigemags05
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Denton, TX
If you really think the issue is with the sending unit, I’m interested for sure.

but both of the sending units I have are testing with the correct ohms. Both work and read correctly outside of the tank.

I understand that buying oem quality quality is best (didn’t realize that was an option when I bought the previous two sending units), but i can’t see spending the money now unless I have a pretty good idea that the sending unit is the issue.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2018 | 06:50 PM
  #38  
kr98664's Avatar
kr98664
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 7,171
Likes: 1,173
Originally Posted by Gigemags05
I re-installed the sending unit and the gauge still reads empty at all times. I ran a ground from the gauge to the sending unit and chassis at the same time, no change.
Did you take the three resistance readings I suggested in post #26? I'm trying to understand if one end of the sender circuit is grounded to the sender body, and thus the tank when installed. Knowing this little detail will make a huge difference for troubleshooting.

I THINK the sender circuit is not supposed to be electrically connected to the sender body, but am not positive. If completely isolated like I'm thinking, the same sender could even be installed in a plastic tank and still work fine. If

My TheoryDuJour™, subject to wind direction and my medication levels: When the sender is installed and the gauge is showing empty, the needle is actually slightly below E. 12 ohms to ground from the sender is designed to put the needle on E. If there was an unwanted path to ground (between the sender circuit and the sender body), you'd have closer to 0 ohms. That should drive the needle slightly below E.

Try the gauge with the sender out of the tank and see exactly where the needle sits. It should be on E. Then install the sender and repeat. Expect to see the needle slightly lower. If so, that confirms there's an unwanted ground path through the sender body and tank.

Did you get both senders from the same source? Could be the same fault with both. Take the readings suggested in post #26 and report back. Maybe the problem is really two bad senders. Don't just rush out and buy a third just yet. Report the resistance values first, and if warranted, get a new sender from a different source.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Sep 26, 2018 | 07:22 PM
  #39  
Gigemags05's Avatar
Gigemags05
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Denton, TX
Okay,
I performed the tests in post #26. See below. Also, when the sender is out of the tank and on "empty", the needle is just above the E on the gauge. When installed, the needle is pointed exactly at the middle of the E on the gauge. The two senders look just alike. They are most likely both from the same factory, even if they came in different boxes. I cannot find where I purchased the first one. It was in 2014-2015 and I don't have the receipt, although I am certain it was from rock auto or amazon. The second one was from Amazon and is a Spectra.

Originally Posted by kr98664
With the sender removed and sitting on your workbench, fire up your ohmmeter. Select a range of about 200 ohms, or something close. Test the meter by touching the leads together. The meter should show good continuity, usually just a fraction of an ohm for the test leads.
Correct, the meter showed right at 1.7 OHM

Originally Posted by kr98664
one lead to the body of the sender. The flat ring (the mounting surface) is a good place. Connect the other lead to one of the insulated terminals. I'm thinking there should not be any continuity. Cycle the arm up and down but I'm still thinking the resistance value should not change, but am not positive.
I connected one lead to the body and one to the ground terminal. I still got 1.7-2.0 ohms

Originally Posted by kr98664
, keep the first lead on the sender body and move the other lead to the second insulated terminal. Cycle the arm again and it should not change, if I'm thinking correctly.
I connected one lead to the body and one to the terminal that goes to the gauge. The reading was 77 ohms empty and 12 full.

Originally Posted by kr98664
After that, put a meter lead on each of the insulated terminals. Cycle the arm up and down and you should see the value change to reflect the fuel level.
This functioned the same as above. 77 ohms empty and 12 full.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2018 | 09:21 PM
  #40  
Gigemags05's Avatar
Gigemags05
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Denton, TX
just to confirm, the fuel tank I have and the unit I have are the correct match, right? Everything I’ve found says this is the unit that goes with the tank I have (linked below), but I do know there are other units for the other sizes tanks.

My tank looks identical to the one i linked below, but is there anything on the tank that could be different or causing an issue? Were there minor differences in tanks from prior years that would call for a different sending unit?

Fuel Tank (Mine is original, but this is the size/shape):

https://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo...121308&jsn=473

Fuel Tank Sending Unit:

https://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo...121308&jsn=481
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2018 | 12:17 AM
  #41  
kr98664's Avatar
kr98664
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 7,171
Likes: 1,173
Okay, it seems one side of the sender circuit is grounded to the sender body. This isn’t necessarily a fault, just a little different than I was thinking. So in theory, if the tank is well grounded, you wouldn’t even need that external ground wire running to the frame from the sender’s second insulated terminal. Just for giggles, have you tried disconnecting that ground wire?

How are you powering the circuit? With the tank empty, obviously the engine isn’t running. Are you running straight off the battery? Do you have a charger keeping the battery topped off? If so, try turning off the charger and disconnecting it. I’m wondering if the charger is pumping out some weird waveform that is confusing the poor gauge.

How about the lighting in your garage? For example, a bad fluorescent ballast can pump out a LOT of electrical noise, which could affect a delicate gauge circuit. Maybe try the same test but with the lights off? Or do you live under high-tension power lines?

One last straw to grasp: Perhaps the gauge itself has something funky going on. The gauge is just responding to a variable resistance from the sender. Try this: Instead of observing the changing resistance via the gauge, use the ohmmeter. Use some tape or string to secure the float arm about mid travel. Record the resistance. Carefully install the sender without moving the float arm. Did the resistance change?
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2018 | 08:23 AM
  #42  
Gigemags05's Avatar
Gigemags05
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Denton, TX
I did try it with the ground disconnected, but that was a while ago. Maybe I didn't isolate that variable at the time. I will try that again tonight.

My shop has LED lights, and I wouldn't think they would be playing this much hell with the sending unit, but at this point...who knows???

The way the sender is powered is from the gauge. The gauge is powered with switched 12v from the fuse box. There is no charger on the battery,etc.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2018 | 08:56 AM
  #43  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,980
Likes: 2,735
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
I have a strange story to tell, its not over yet. Where i worked several years ago, i had a gm van. Electric pump went out. The facility mech changed the whole assembly out. Right after i got it back i noticed the fuel guage didnt work. I was just grateful to get it back and did not say anything. A couple of fill ups later it started working and kept working

Just recently had to change the fuel pump-sending unit in my tahoe. Put it all back together and the fuel guage did not work. On a hunch i have been driving it, using the trip odometer to keep track of the fuel. The guage didnt read, the one day it started reading half with a very full tank. I was going to give up on it till the other day my wife noticed it was reading full with a very full tank. While keeping track of the mileage i have been watching it slowly drop. Still not sure its working yet, but i can keep hoping. I cant explain it except i get the feeling when the new float is first submerged in fuel, its not floating. Fuel is a little different than water ,
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2018 | 09:05 AM
  #44  
Gigemags05's Avatar
Gigemags05
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Denton, TX
Funny you mentioned that. I was just telling my wife last night that I am going to go fill the tank all the way up, drive at least one full tank through it and hope for a miracle, haha. Maybe this is a sign that I should do just that!
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2018 | 05:23 PM
  #45  
kr98664's Avatar
kr98664
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 7,171
Likes: 1,173
Originally Posted by Gigemags05
when the sender is out of the tank and on "empty", the needle is just above the E on the gauge. When installed, the needle is pointed exactly at the middle of the E on the gauge. ​​​​​
So I gets to thinking some more...

Obviously something is changing when the sender is installed. But what?

Try this. For now, let's take the gauge completely out of the equation. Let's stick to just a resistance reading from the sender's insulated terminal (the one to the gauge) and the ground point on the frame. Keep the sender's ground wire (to the frame) connected. In other words, I want the ohmmeter to see what the gauge would normally see.

Take a resistance reading with the sender not installed, but with the ground wire connected. Next, put the sender in the tank so it's making metal to metal contact, but do NOT install the locking ring yet. If the resistance changes just from the sender body touching the tank, then we know it's an electrical issue.

If no change yet, install and tighten the locking ring while watching the meter. If you now get a change, that would indicate a mechanical issue with the sender. Tightening the locking ring is warping something and somehow affecting the resistance of the sender.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE