Notices
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

Fuel Sending Unit - Issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 24, 2018 | 07:10 PM
  #16  
Gigemags05's Avatar
Gigemags05
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Denton, TX
I guess that makes sense but I don’t see how that effects my issue.

I’ve got the gauge wired per the instructions and the sender is only getting 8.5v, which actually sounds close to what the factory sender would get. The gauge is supposed to be designed to work with the factory sender, so that kind of makes sense.

I just can’t figure out why it works as it’s sulposed to when it’s outside the tank and doesn’t work inside the tank.
 
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2018 | 07:33 PM
  #17  
ctubutis's Avatar
ctubutis
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 22,415
Likes: 92
From: Denver Metro Area, CO
Club FTE Gold Member
My guess is a grounding issue somehow.
 
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2018 | 07:38 PM
  #18  
FuzzFace2's Avatar
FuzzFace2
FTE Legend
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 30,890
Likes: 4,119
From: Angier, NC
Club FTE Gold Member
So I am guessing the stock blinking on/off to get to the lower voltage of your on all the time 8.5 volts.

Did you run a jumper wire from the powered wire to the sender and not hook up the ground to see what happens?
Are you sure you are hooking the wire to the right stud on the sender?
Could the voltage of 8.5 be to high for the sender?

On my other project in the factory service book it gives how to test the fuel gauge using resistors.
I would figure what the empty / half / full resistance is and using resisters to test the gauge workings.
I would think if that did not work out right the gauge is bad.

Oh I did look over the links and there is nothing to hooking it up so I am at a lost??
Dave ----
 
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2018 | 07:40 PM
  #19  
Gigemags05's Avatar
Gigemags05
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Denton, TX
It seems like it has to be. But if that is the case it is where the sending unit touches the tank, right? Bc that’s be only contact it has with the tank anywhere.

should i try to put some electric tape on the unit where it touches the tank? I would think the rubber seal would do this.
 
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2018 | 07:44 PM
  #20  
FuzzFace2's Avatar
FuzzFace2
FTE Legend
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 30,890
Likes: 4,119
From: Angier, NC
Club FTE Gold Member
What if you run a ground wire from the gauge to the tank sender so they are both grounded to each other.
Just pulling things out of the air here LOL
Dave ----
 
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2018 | 07:47 PM
  #21  
Gigemags05's Avatar
Gigemags05
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Denton, TX
Originally Posted by FuzzFace2
So I am guessing the stock blinking on/off to get to the lower voltage of your on all the time 8.5 volts.

Did you run a jumper wire from the powered wire to the sender and not hook up the ground to see what happens?
Are you sure you are hooking the wire to the right stud on the sender?
Could the voltage of 8.5 be to high for the sender?

On my other project in the factory service book it gives how to test the fuel gauge using resistors.
I would figure what the empty / half / full resistance is and using resisters to test the gauge workings.
I would think if that did not work out right the gauge is bad.

Oh I did look over the links and there is nothing to hooking it up so I am at a lost??
Dave ----
the install instructions for the fuel gauge show how to wire it, which is just 12v switched to one terminal, ground to one terminal, and sending unit to one terminal.

I have switched the ground and power wires on the sender and it didn’t change anything, other than the gauge showing full af all times when inside the tank. When it’s outside the tank it works the same no matter how it’s wired up. It shows full at full, half at half, empty at empty when out of the tank, no matter how it’s wired.
 
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2018 | 10:15 PM
  #22  
kr98664's Avatar
kr98664
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 7,172
Likes: 1,173
Originally Posted by Gigemags05
the install instructions for the fuel gauge show how to wire it, which is just 12v switched to one terminal, ground to one terminal, and sending unit to one terminal.

I have switched the ground and power wires on the sender and it didn’t change anything...
Okay, the Equus wiring diagram shows only a single wire to the sender. However, the sender shown at Rockauto has two insulated terminals, so I'm assuming (Danger! Danger!) your second wire is the sender ground?

If so, where exactly is this wire grounded? I like Dave's suggestion to run a ground jumper up to the ground point at the gauge. If that wire is attached to the cab, the cab itself may not be properly grounded. A jumper between the two points may clear it up.

Do you have an electric in-tank pump or anything else electrical at the tank? If the tank sits on rubber strips, the tank itself may not be properly grounded. Add an electric pump or who knows what, and now not only is tank not grounded, it has an electric potential above ground. My head spins thinking of the possibilities, but something like that could give you grief.

Please help me understand the sender. Set your multimeter to read ohms. Is there any continuity (less than 1 ohm) between the sender body and either insulated terminal? The way I'm thinking, there shouldn't be any, but I'd like to confirm this.

The gauge gets its power directly from a 12v source, right? If so, the previous discussion about the IVR doesn't apply at all. That means the only part of the circuit relevant to an 82 F150 is the tank and sender. None of the other wiring in the circuit follows the 82 wiring diagram.

The 8.5v you're reading at the sender? Don't worry about it. The meter is connected in series with the gauge. The resistance of the gauge is so deliberately high (this intentionally limits current flow through the sender) that the meter skews the current flow. I could bore you to tears with details of how a circuit behaves under test, but the short story is that isn't a valid test so don't worry about this seemingly misleading value.
 
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2018 | 11:33 PM
  #23  
kr98664's Avatar
kr98664
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 7,172
Likes: 1,173
Originally Posted by kr98664
Please help me understand the sender. Set your multimeter to read ohms. Is there any continuity (less than 1 ohm) between the sender body and either insulated terminal? The way I'm thinking, there shouldn't be any, but I'd like to confirm this.

Ooh! Ooh! Mr. Kotter! Mr. Kotter! I know this one!

Please also test for continuity from the sender arm to the two insulated terminals. When installed, and the arm is resting on the bottom of the empty tank, suddenly you’ve got an unwanted path to ground.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Sep 25, 2018 | 09:04 AM
  #24  
Gigemags05's Avatar
Gigemags05
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Denton, TX
I'll try to answer your questions, please disregard my ignorance.

Originally Posted by kr98664
Okay, the Equus wiring diagram shows only a single wire to the sender. However, the sender shown at Rockauto has two insulated terminals, so I'm assuming (Danger! Danger!) your second wire is the sender ground?

If so, where exactly is this wire grounded? I like Dave's suggestion to run a ground jumper up to the ground point at the gauge. If that wire is attached to the cab, the cab itself may not be properly grounded. A jumper between the two points may clear it up.
Correct, the second wire is the ground wire for the sender. I have it attached to the vehicle frame. Its a good clean ground.

Originally Posted by kr98664
Do you have an electric in-tank pump or anything else electrical at the tank? If the tank sits on rubber strips, the tank itself may not be properly grounded. Add an electric pump or who knows what, and now not only is tank not grounded, it has an electric potential above ground. My head spins thinking of the possibilities, but something like that could give you grief.
No, the fuel pump is mechanical, located in the engine block.

Originally Posted by kr98664
Please help me understand the sender. Set your multimeter to read ohms. Is there any continuity (less than 1 ohm) between the sender body and either insulated terminal? The way I'm thinking, there shouldn't be any, but I'd like to confirm this.
I will try this when I get a chance. Are you saying to test ohms on the terminal of the sender and the terminal on the gauge? I'm a little confused.

Originally Posted by kr98664
The gauge gets its power directly from a 12v source, right? If so, the previous discussion about the IVR doesn't apply at all. That means the only part of the circuit relevant to an 82 F150 is the tank and sender. None of the other wiring in the circuit follows the 82 wiring diagram.
Yes, I believe you are correct. The only '82 specific parts are the tank and the sender.

Originally Posted by kr98664
The 8.5v you're reading at the sender? Don't worry about it. The meter is connected in series with the gauge. The resistance of the gauge is so deliberately high (this intentionally limits current flow through the sender) that the meter skews the current flow. I could bore you to tears with details of how a circuit behaves under test, but the short story is that isn't a valid test so don't worry about this seemingly misleading value.
Okay this is good information. I was pretty confused about this.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2018 | 09:06 AM
  #25  
Gigemags05's Avatar
Gigemags05
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Denton, TX
Originally Posted by kr98664



Ooh! Ooh! Mr. Kotter! Mr. Kotter! I know this one!

Please also test for continuity from the sender arm to the two insulated terminals. When installed, and the arm is resting on the bottom of the empty tank, suddenly you’ve got an unwanted path to ground.
When you say two insulated terminals, you are referring to the terminals on the sender unit, correct?
I don't believe the arm rests on the bottom of the tank when empty. But even if it did, when there is fuel in the tank and its floating, the gauge is reading empty.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2018 | 11:15 AM
  #26  
kr98664's Avatar
kr98664
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 7,172
Likes: 1,173
Originally Posted by Gigemags05
Correct, the second wire is the ground wire for the sender. I have it attached to the vehicle frame. Its a good clean ground.


Are you saying to test ohms on the terminal of the sender and the terminal on the gauge? I'm a little confused.
Let me make sure we are talking about the same thing. On the sender you linked at RockAuto, I see two insulated terminals. I'm not concerned with the terminals on the gauge for the moment, just the sender.

With the sender removed and sitting on your workbench, fire up your ohmmeter. Select a range of about 200 ohms, or something close. Test the meter by touching the leads together. The meter should show good continuity, usually just a fraction of an ohm for the test leads.

Connect one lead to the body of the sender. The flat ring (the mounting surface) is a good place. Connect the other lead to one of the insulated terminals. I'm thinking there should not be any continuity. Cycle the arm up and down but I'm still thinking the resistance value should not change, but am not positive.

Next, keep the first lead on the sender body and move the other lead to the second insulated terminal. Cycle the arm again and it should not change, if I'm thinking correctly.

After that, put a meter lead on each of the insulated terminals. Cycle the arm up and down and you should see the value change to reflect the fuel level.

Anyways, that's how I think the sender is wired. Can you please take a few minutes to confirm this?
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2018 | 11:26 AM
  #27  
Gigemags05's Avatar
Gigemags05
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Denton, TX
Yes, I will bench test the OHMS on the sending unit when I get home. The factory sending unit is supposed to be 73 full-10 empty +/-.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2018 | 04:44 PM
  #28  
FuzzFace2's Avatar
FuzzFace2
FTE Legend
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 30,890
Likes: 4,119
From: Angier, NC
Club FTE Gold Member
Equus 7361 Details Fuel Level Gauges
  • Range: Empty=73 Ohm, Full=10 Ohm
    • Compatible with most Ford and Chrysler Senders
      • Back-Lit illumination for night use
        • 90° Sweep
          • Rear twist-on ring mount design makes mounting simple Installation adapters sold separately

          Specifications:

          Manufacturer's Part Number:7361


          I wonder if you have one of them not most sending units?
          Dave ----
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2018 | 04:49 PM
  #29  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,980
Likes: 2,735
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Back up in this thread, you guys were mixing up the factory setup with his aftermarket setup. No IVR and no blinking voltage in his setup.

I would say 8.5 volts is normal. You are going to have some voltage drop through the gauge. Even though this is a aftermarket setup, it generally works the same as the factory units, 12v all the time to the gauge, the sending unit varies the GROUND to the gauge, making it read the correct level. Since you are reading voltage on the GROUND wire, 8.5v is probably correct, and is also why it works when out of the truck.

The only difference I see being in the truck or out of the truck is grounding. I may have missed it if you already did this test, but I would still ground the sending unit out of the truck and see if it fails to work correctly. If it works correctly being grounded to the truck while holding it in your hand and moving the float, the only other thing I can think of is the float is not floating properly.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2018 | 05:08 PM
  #30  
FuzzFace2's Avatar
FuzzFace2
FTE Legend
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 30,890
Likes: 4,119
From: Angier, NC
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Franklin2
Back up in this thread, you guys were mixing up the factory setup with his aftermarket setup. No IVR and no blinking voltage in his setup.

I would say 8.5 volts is normal. You are going to have some voltage drop through the gauge. Even though this is a aftermarket setup, it generally works the same as the factory units, 12v all the time to the gauge, the sending unit varies the GROUND to the gauge, making it read the correct level. Since you are reading voltage on the GROUND wire, 8.5v is probably correct, and is also why it works when out of the truck.

The only difference I see being in the truck or out of the truck is grounding.
I was just pointing out how the stock setup works with the hope someone would see something and say "Hay you need to do xxxxx".

I would think you are right on the after market gauge and how it works. I am thinking it has an internal IVR made from electronics to drop the volts and why it does not blink like stock does.

I think he did test it out of the tank / truck and it worked so he put it back in and got the same "no work" thing.
I would like to know how he gets this to work just because as there is no reason why it should not.


Dave ----
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE