Notices

What's your CG zone?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 10, 2018 | 07:07 PM
  #1  
nick_m's Avatar
nick_m
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 27
Likes: 11
What's your CG zone?

Hello Campers,

This is a follow-up to my previous post regarding lack of TC certification. I'm trying to determine the truck loading values for my rig, but it looks like there are too many variables to solve for both zone and max weight (you can artificially reduce the max load by expanding the zone too far forward). The cert sheet that SDcrewzer was kind enough to post showed a 15" zone, presumably from the rear axle, and I recall someone else having mentioned a 15" zone. If anyone knows the formula, I'd love to hear it. Otherwise, if you have your cert sheet handy, could you tell me the offsets, and whether they're based on the rear axle? I can determine the loads based on where my camper has to sit (12" fwd of axle), but I'd like to see if Ford simply uses a fixed 15" zone.

BTW, the dealer said Ford was unable/unwilling to generate the values even if I upgraded the front spring to 6000 lb (the only piece missing from the TC option). I understand the liability concerns, but it's unfortunate, since making that information available would help their customers drive a safer setup.

Thanks!
Nick
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2018 | 09:59 AM
  #2  
RV_Tech's Avatar
RV_Tech
Hotshot
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 10,060
Likes: 491
From: Bristol, TN.
Nick,

This thread is not getting a lot of hits and my thought is because most of us or nearly all do not worry that much about zone placement. The TC manufacturers have a lot of information out there about placement and it all seems to say the same thing in my estimation. You want the COG ahead of the rear axle.Conventional wisdom says with a long bed truck very little weight is transferred to the front axle and with a short bed no weight at all. If you put a camper made for a long bed on a short bed truck, your COG will be further back than would be ideal (although plenty of folks do it).

From the git-go in your earlier thread I had no worry at all that your truck was suitable for hauling a TC and I wonder if the point being raised here is worth very much consideration. I load my Hallmark as far forward as I can without the camper bashing the truck taillights and fasten it down. I replaced the bounce stops on my truck with Super Springs and used the stops I took off fastening them to the Happijjac stabilzer bar that connects my right and left tie downs. That makes the stops almost perfect length, and that's about it. I guess I might be underthinking it, but I am curious how many folks worry that much about positioning beyond what I do.
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2018 | 02:15 PM
  #3  
nick_m's Avatar
nick_m
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 27
Likes: 11
RV_Tech,

Thanks for chiming in; you're point is well taken. Combine moderate OCD with a career in precision measurement (where cert sheets are everything) and you can develop an obsession with metrics.

I was taught by the TC dealer to load the camper with the bumper pads touching, so I thought that was standard practice. I'm (obviously) still learning...

Nick
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2018 | 02:28 PM
  #4  
RV_Tech's Avatar
RV_Tech
Hotshot
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 10,060
Likes: 491
From: Bristol, TN.
Nick, here's the thing and this is absolutely not a slam, but sometimes FTE drives me crazy because folks do seem to go OCD and they do it on topics I know backwards and forwards having seen them dozens of times in my work. In this case, I honestly don't think Ford 's slip of paper makes a bit of difference which is what I think you are also seeing on RV Net in their truck camper forum.

Suppose you get another 50 pounds one way or another on our front or rear axle, how will you ever know and are you certain you will load the same way each time? As you follow the various truck camper forums you will find folks who stop and continually readjust their camper to make sure it is absolutely centered. I don't and if mine shifts a half inch one way or another I really don't care. My load is secure, my truck handles it great, and I think the factors that make the most sense are the ones in the real world. So far from I have seen in your posts, the last thing in the world I am worried about is you doing something crazy! Just a hunch!
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2018 | 04:58 PM
  #5  
nick_m's Avatar
nick_m
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 27
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by RV_Tech
Nick, here's the thing and this is absolutely not a slam, but sometimes FTE drives me crazy because folks do seem to go OCD and they do it on topics I know backwards and forwards having seen them dozens of times in my work. In this case, I honestly don't think Ford 's slip of paper makes a bit of difference which is what I think you are also seeing on RV Net in their truck camper forum.

Suppose you get another 50 pounds one way or another on our front or rear axle, how will you ever know and are you certain you will load the same way each time? As you follow the various truck camper forums you will find folks who stop and continually readjust their camper to make sure it is absolutely centered. I don't and if mine shifts a half inch one way or another I really don't care. My load is secure, my truck handles it great, and I think the factors that make the most sense are the ones in the real world. So far from I have seen in your posts, the last thing in the world I am worried about is you doing something crazy! Just a hunch!
RV_Tech,

No slam taken, and I appreciate your candor. Good hunch, by the way.

The swing outs just arrived, so I'm hoping to take a first test drive tomorrow.

Thanks for all the help!
Nick
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2018 | 12:39 PM
  #6  
Alaskan_Warbird's Avatar
Alaskan_Warbird
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,962
Likes: 11
From: Fairbanks, AK
Originally Posted by nick_m
The swing outs just arrived, so I'm hoping to take a first test drive tomorrow.
Nick
How'd the first drive go? I've been following some of your questions as well. Thanks for asking, as many folks will learn along with you or in the future.
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2018 | 01:05 PM
  #7  
RV_Tech's Avatar
RV_Tech
Hotshot
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 10,060
Likes: 491
From: Bristol, TN.
For those who didn't know these existed and I sure didn't, but already shared it with Nick on another site, Ford now has PDFs of their truck camper loading recommendations for 2017 and 2018 trucks.

Here are the URL: The first one is for the 17s, the second for the 18s. http://www.fordservicecontent.com/fo...er-Loading.pdf and http://www.fordservicecontent.com/fo...er-Loading.pdf
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2018 | 05:27 PM
  #8  
nick_m's Avatar
nick_m
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 27
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by Alaskan_Warbird
How'd the first drive go? I've been following some of your questions as well. Thanks for asking, as many folks will learn along with you or in the future.
Alaskan_Warbird,

The drive went great! Thanks for asking. The swing outs went on without a hitch, and I dodged a bullet on Ford's new bumper design. On some campers, the raised end of the bumper requires modification of the sewer drain. I had to reroute a propane takeoff line under rather than over the pipe, but otherwise it was a perfect fit even with the camper all the way forward.

I added Stableloads on the lowers, and the sway is minimal. I haven't run without them yet, so I can't quantify the improvement. Even through the roundabouts - I have 5 between home and the freeway - there's very little roll. That used to be a white knuckle affair in my SRW. I might go ahead and do the uppers, since they're not yet engaged. As far as the camper certification goes, as RV_Tech points out, the loading documents have all the information a data junkie could ever want. The neat thing is that the dealer agreed to upgrade the springs to 6000 lbs to bring it to camper spec. That's service!

By the way, is that license real or Photoshopped?

Thanks again for the help.
Nick
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Aug 13, 2018 | 06:19 PM
  #9  
Alaskan_Warbird's Avatar
Alaskan_Warbird
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,962
Likes: 11
From: Fairbanks, AK
Good to hear! That's my real license plate. I've been in IT and into computers most of my life - the 'F' doesn't actually refer to Ford.
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2018 | 06:57 PM
  #10  
nick_m's Avatar
nick_m
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 27
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by Alaskan_Warbird
Good to hear! That's my real license plate. I've been in IT and into computers most of my life - the 'F' doesn't actually refer to Ford.
Oh, I'm familiar with the term - that's why I asked I was a software developer back in the day. Now I develop training videos because no one would read our "Fine" manuals, but everyone will go to Youtube for info.
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2018 | 07:11 PM
  #11  
Alaskan_Warbird's Avatar
Alaskan_Warbird
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,962
Likes: 11
From: Fairbanks, AK
Originally Posted by nick_m
Oh, I'm familiar with the term - that's why I asked I was a software developer back in the day. Now I develop training videos because no one would read our "Fine" manuals, but everyone will go to Youtube for info.
Awesome. My first program was on an Apple IIe, in BASIC. I got into all of this back in 1982 after watching TRON. Started modding cases, fans, overclocking (before it became automated), and hacking (mostly white hat). Don't call myself a programmer anymore but am still heavily involved in IT, mainly in security, and system and database administration. Fun times.

Side note: I couldn't believe the DMV let me have the plates when I discovered them available on their web site many years ago. They cause quite a bit of envy from those in the know.
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2018 | 07:28 PM
  #12  
nick_m's Avatar
nick_m
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 27
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by Alaskan_Warbird
Awesome. My first program was on an Apple IIe, in BASIC. I got into all of this back in 1982 after watching TRON. Started modding cases, fans, overclocking (before it became automated), and hacking (mostly white hat). Don't call myself a programmer anymore but am still heavily involved in IT, mainly in security, and system and database administration. Fun times.

Side note: I couldn't believe the DMV let me have the plates when I discovered them available on their web site many years ago. They cause quite a bit of envy from those in the know.
No kidding! Someone at the DMV was asleep. Definitely envious.

In 1982 I was coding in FORTRAN on punch card machines (not fun times). We sound like the couple of old tech geeks that we are. +1 on Tron (but only the original).
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 11:26 PM
  #13  
nuctrooper's Avatar
nuctrooper
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 906
Likes: 107
From: Seattle area
I think the CG discussion is rather academic when looking at a major manufacturer TC. It only applies under one set condition, and is completely different during real world use. Sure, if you are building your own you need to consider nominal CG, but for buying one that has already been engineered, the only real thing you need to do is buy enough truck to haul the camper.
Real world example (varies by design of course). Load the truck up for three or four days of boondocking. Fridge full, extra beer, water tank full, grey and black empty. CG is well forward of the axle. Now drive way into the mountains and chill for a few days. Fresh water tank (in front of axle) gets transferrred to the grey and black tanks( behind the axle), and the fridge and food get emptied (in front of axle). You have easily removed 800lb+ from in front of the axle and added 500lb behind the axle. The CG is waaay different, and possibly behind the axle now. Of course manufacturers say don’t drive with grey and black full, because the CG is not a static point in real world use (I guess unless you use full hookups at every stop, but what TC does that?).
The only real world solution is to have enough truck to handle the large, variable weight. Don’t sweat the CG, don’t sweat a paper cert, try to stay within reasonable limits. If you don’t have significant reserve capacity in your truck, consider not allowing grey and black to get full before leaving your spot, or shifting heavy gear forward (and low) when you leave to offset the waste tanks.
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2018 | 10:52 AM
  #14  
nick_m's Avatar
nick_m
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 27
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by nuctrooper
I think the CG discussion is rather academic when looking at a major manufacturer TC. It only applies under one set condition, and is completely different during real world use. Sure, if you are building your own you need to consider nominal CG, but for buying one that has already been engineered, the only real thing you need to do is buy enough truck to haul the camper.
Real world example (varies by design of course). Load the truck up for three or four days of boondocking. Fridge full, extra beer, water tank full, grey and black empty. CG is well forward of the axle. Now drive way into the mountains and chill for a few days. Fresh water tank (in front of axle) gets transferrred to the grey and black tanks( behind the axle), and the fridge and food get emptied (in front of axle). You have easily removed 800lb+ from in front of the axle and added 500lb behind the axle. The CG is waaay different, and possibly behind the axle now. Of course manufacturers say don’t drive with grey and black full, because the CG is not a static point in real world use (I guess unless you use full hookups at every stop, but what TC does that?).
The only real world solution is to have enough truck to handle the large, variable weight. Don’t sweat the CG, don’t sweat a paper cert, try to stay within reasonable limits. If you don’t have significant reserve capacity in your truck, consider not allowing grey and black to get full before leaving your spot, or shifting heavy gear forward (and low) when you leave to offset the waste tanks.
I wasn't sweating - honestly! I just wanted to know Ford's opinion, or as Alaskan_Warbird might say, I wanted to Read The "Ford" Document. With the 6000 lb springs up front, I can find what I'd like to know from the document that ardvark provided, and I'm sure I have "enough truck" to cover my needs, now and in the foreseeable future.
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2018 | 04:58 PM
  #15  
nuctrooper's Avatar
nuctrooper
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 906
Likes: 107
From: Seattle area
Originally Posted by nick_m
I wasn't sweating - honestly! I just wanted to know Ford's opinion, or as Alaskan_Warbird might say, I wanted to Read The "Ford" Document. With the 6000 lb springs up front, I can find what I'd like to know from the document that ardvark provided, and I'm sure I have "enough truck" to cover my needs, now and in the foreseeable future.
You certainly have enough truck! Load it up and have fun! Wouldn’t sweat one number difference in front springs at all.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE