Notices

cubic inch confusion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 17, 2018 | 12:40 AM
  #1  
tintop48's Avatar
tintop48
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Unhappy cubic inch confusion

hi,as the title states im somewhat confused.my truck is a 94 f250xlt 7.5l.its main purpose in life is to pull my 4000# tt.torque numbers are around 395 on a good day,which isnt alot when pulling a steep grade.thats a lot of c.u for only 395 when my 71 merc with a 429 is rated at 460 ft.lbs.the merc does have 10to1 compression so my question is does the comp.ratio explain the difference in torque numbers or is something else going on.its about time to think about a rebuild and if there are things that can be done to bring the torque numbers up to around 460 without making the engine way bigger i would appreciate someone clueing me in.thanks
 
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2018 | 01:26 AM
  #2  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,527
Likes: 2,830
Club FTE Gold Member
71 was rated by the old gross power numbers influenced by marketing considerations. 460 is rated at net power, with the mufflers and air cleaner and ps / water pumps etc. Compression impacts torque also. More later.
 
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2018 | 09:51 AM
  #3  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,527
Likes: 2,830
Club FTE Gold Member
This goes into the Wayback Machine and gives eye-glazing detail about the change from gross to net.

https://ateupwithmotor.com/terms-tec...et-horsepower/

Look at this blast from the past. A 390, in 3 different configurations, makes 427 lb/ft in each one. A pillow barge 428 as seen in T birds and Galaxies is rated 345HP. Add some performance parts and it is now shown to be 335HP. "Marketing considerations". You can't sell something your customer can't insure for example.

FE Series Engine Specification Chart
 
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2018 | 09:56 AM
  #4  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,527
Likes: 2,830
Club FTE Gold Member
A fellow traveler. There is no free lunch:

Headers vs. Stock manifolds - 460 Ford Forum
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2018 | 05:34 PM
  #5  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
And curious that the Boss 302 and the Chevy 302 had the same HP rating. I had Werby run the numbers on the stroker 454 I built out of a lowriser 427 back in the 80's. Same stock comp ratio, only difference being the HM310 cam (.515 gross lift, 294* advertised duration 108 LSA) which isn't all that different from the stock cam in these engines. he came up with 460 HP at 5500 rpm. with the stock 2x4 intake and carbs.
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2018 | 05:00 PM
  #6  
xlt4wd90's Avatar
xlt4wd90
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,018
Likes: 210
From: SoCal
Club FTE Silver Member

Producing torque is easier for a larger engine at lower speeds, but it's also highly dependent on how the engine is set up. If you look at the current 5.0 liter Coyote engine, its torque peak is 400 lbs-ft in the truck version, and 410 for the Mustang version. And horsepower is close to 400 for the truck and 460 for the Mustang. These numbers are all SAE net at the flywheel. This engine has small block displacement, but producing big block power and torque. mostly from very sophisticated air flow management that consists of fancy plumbing on top of the DOHC heads and really complicated computer control.
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2018 | 07:47 PM
  #7  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
Originally Posted by xlt4wd90
Producing torque is easier for a larger engine at lower speeds, but it's also highly dependent on how the engine is set up. If you look at the current 5.0 liter Coyote engine, its torque peak is 400 lbs-ft in the truck version, and 410 for the Mustang version. And horsepower is close to 400 for the truck and 460 for the Mustang. These numbers are all SAE net at the flywheel. This engine has small block displacement, but producing big block power and torque. mostly from very sophisticated air flow management that consists of fancy plumbing on top of the DOHC heads and really complicated computer control.
Mostly due to variable valve timing.
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2018 | 03:54 AM
  #8  
xlt4wd90's Avatar
xlt4wd90
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,018
Likes: 210
From: SoCal
Club FTE Silver Member

Yes, the VVT is part of the air flow management I was referring to, and it's making the engine very versatile.

I know Ford is using TiVCT to implement passive EGR, but I'm not sure if it has enough range to run the engine in Atkinson cycle to improve efficiency.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-2

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-7

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jul 25, 2018 | 06:20 AM
  #9  
Chuck's First Ford's Avatar
Chuck's First Ford
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 22
From: very South Texas
apples to oranges to banana's..... 50 plus years of technology..

major changes in testing.... type of testing... computers vers analog...

where is my Sunoco 260 fuel .... Amoco White Gas...( not the camping stove white gas)
Sunoco "Blue",,,, Cam II..... etc.
love the smell of 112 octane gas.
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2018 | 07:36 AM
  #10  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
Originally Posted by Chuck's First Ford
love the smell of 112 octane gas.

That was the Cancer causing Benzene you were sniffing...………………………….
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2018 | 09:13 AM
  #11  
Chuck's First Ford's Avatar
Chuck's First Ford
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 22
From: very South Texas
Originally Posted by baddad457

That was the Cancer causing Benzene you were sniffing...………………………….
between motor oil and axle grease in my hair... and brake shoe Dust up my nose.... I got to die from something....

66 years and counting... motorcycle riding for 49 years.. and Still Here.
50 years as an auto mechanic.. and still have all 10 fingers...

for many years.. I used gasoline in my cigarette lighter...
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2018 | 11:46 AM
  #12  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
Originally Posted by Chuck's First Ford
between motor oil and axle grease in my hair... and brake shoe Dust up my nose.... I got to die from something....

66 years and counting... motorcycle riding for 49 years.. and Still Here.
50 years as an auto mechanic.. and still have all 10 fingers...

for many years.. I used gasoline in my cigarette lighter...
What ? I use it and still do to wash parts ! How many times have I had the stuff in my mouth trying to get a siphon started ?
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2018 | 11:54 AM
  #13  
Chuck's First Ford's Avatar
Chuck's First Ford
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 22
From: very South Texas
Originally Posted by baddad457
What ? I use it and still do to wash parts ! How many times have I had the stuff in my mouth trying to get a siphon started ?
I use a tired electric in-tank fuel pump.... and 30 feet of wire

I am not fond of flammable spit...
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2018 | 12:02 PM
  #14  
Chuck's First Ford's Avatar
Chuck's First Ford
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 22
From: very South Texas


To the OP.

Apologies for the DERAILMENT

2 smashed rail cars.. broken building... no words for the overhead Wiring.

If I had done a better JOB of derailment.. I would have dug out the Steam Locomotive derailments .....
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2018 | 02:48 PM
  #15  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,527
Likes: 2,830
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by baddad457
And curious that the Boss 302 and the Chevy 302 had the same HP rating. I had Werby run the numbers on the stroker 454 I built out of a lowriser 427 back in the 80's. Same stock comp ratio, only difference being the HM310 cam (.515 gross lift, 294* advertised duration 108 LSA) which isn't all that different from the stock cam in these engines. he came up with 460 HP at 5500 rpm. with the stock 2x4 intake and carbs.
Boss 302 and Z-28 are prime examples of HP selected with marketing in mind. Keeping them under 300 HP, they kept the insurance man from excessively surcharging these cars. Not sure the links work here anymore, but the Ford made 372 and the Chev 356 when HRM got into their Wayback machine:

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/9...omparison.html
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 AM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE