When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
i just bought a 1979 F100 swb with a 300i6 and 3.03 3spd trans that I’m wanting to turn into a weekend driver/cruiser/Hotrod, I’m collecting parts for my 357w swap and I’m undecided between 2 cams and was looking for advice from those that have used these cams in the past and which one would be better for my application. My specs are
F4TE 351w factory roller block
Scat 3.5 stroke crank
Scat 5.95 connecting rods
AFR 185 heads 58cc
Edelbrock RPM Airgap intake
Holley SA 670 carb
Pistons- I don’t have yet looking for around 10:1
I will be using a 1968 Toploader 4spd out of a Mustang and a 3.50 rear gear
The 2 cams I’m looking at are the Comp XE 270hr and XE 274hr and I cant decide between the 2, I’m not building a race truck just a nice driver and I’m wanting enough vacuum to run brakes etc so if you were building this motor which one would you use and why?
thanks
Conanski I bought a F4TE shortblock and traded some parts I had laying around for a Scat crank and rods still new in the box so I’m gonna use them instead of my stock crank and rods, I really don’t have a horsepower goal my plans for this truck are for it be a cruiser I can take out on nice days to tear up the backroads here in the Ozarks, I want it reliable enough to drive anywhere but I also haven’t spent all this cash to build a stock type motor. Comp does make a XE274hr for a 302 roller application and these 2 cams I’m looking at are for a 302 motor I’m hoping if I did go with the 274 my cubic inches of 357 will tame said cam a bit
Either will be fine with power brakes. They're nowhere near too big for that. Especially with a dual plane intake. You'd have to get a lot bigger on the @.050 numbers and a narrower LSA combined with a single plane intake to get issues with power brakes.
The xe cam lobes from comp are very aggressive. I assume you have the standard afr8017 spring on those heads? You will notice valvetrain noise with those lobes. It will not be whisper quiet if your used to or expecting that.
Woody you’d be correct I am using the AFR8017 springs and I have read that about the XE line being noisy, I’m not dead set on these 2 cams and I’m not really looking for a radical idle, Thanks for the info
Woody you’d be correct I am using the AFR8017 springs and I have read that about the XE line being noisy, I’m not dead set on these 2 cams and I’m not really looking for a radical idle, Thanks for the info
I'm running a Ford Z303 in my 331 and from reading the description you'd think it was extremely radical but it's kinda tame if you ask me, This is .587 lift with 1.7 rockers, 228* @ .050 with a 112 LSA. It idles more like an RV grind most time, only lopey when cold. I ran this same motor in an 89 Ranger for a couple years with power brakes, never had issues with it. Ran a B303 and 1.7's in a 5.0 with a Vic Jr and never had issues there either in the Ranger. The B cam had a lopier idle than the Z. Both cams are noisy with full roller rockers. You could go up to a cam with probably 10-15* more duration with a 112 LSA and not have problems. Or use any EFI grind (which most Hyd rollers are) and still not have vacuum issues at idle. The wider LSA's negate this problem as they have less overlap, which is the cause of low vacuum. The big carb cams with their narrow LSA and wider overlaps are where you'll have issues here. The EFI grinds are more street friendly, and work great with a carburetor, the higher vacuum makes the carb circuits respond faster.
Thanks Baddad I think I’m gonna go with the Comp XE270hr-12 I was also looking at the XE270-14 , the Toploader 4spd I have is a 2.32 first gear close ratio that I will be converting to a 2.78 wide ratio but even still with that 2.78 first gear and 3.50 rear I’m worried that my truck will take off like an old lady on a Hoveround at Walmart so I steered away from the XE274hr, I’m hoping the 270 will give me the torque I need low enough to make the college kid next to me in a new V-6 Camaro sweat coming off the stoplight while still being able to catch second gear at 5600rpms
Thanks Baddad I think I’m gonna go with the Comp XE270hr-12 I was also looking at the XE270-14 , the Toploader 4spd I have is a 2.32 first gear close ratio that I will be converting to a 2.78 wide ratio but even still with that 2.78 first gear and 3.50 rear I’m worried that my truck will take off like an old lady on a Hoveround at Walmart so I steered away from the XE274hr, I’m hoping the 270 will give me the torque I need low enough to make the college kid next to me in a new V-6 Camaro sweat coming off the stoplight while still being able to catch second gear at 5600rpms
You haven't said what size tires you're running, Unless they're really tall ( 31-35") you're not going to have problems taking off even with that 2.32 first gear. I had 3.08's and later 3.73's in my Ranger (yea, everyone thinks they're light but mine weighed in at 3500 lbs) and with 275/60's the 2.78 1st Toploader I have, 1st is most times too low. I can take off in 2nd without problems. (it's in my Comet now, but still could in the Ranger) Run the 2.32 before thinkin about changing the ratios. And that operation's not going to be cheap. You can't just change 1st gear. You have to change them all, including the cluster gear. With a 4 speed, all you need do is rev it up and dump the clutch to get a holeshot on someone. I've been running Toploaders now off and on for 40 years, so I know what's what here. Pickups are light in the rearend, smokin the tires is never a problem. Just me, but I'd go bigger on the cam. The 274 would be no problem in your truck in a 351 with that intake and carb.
Baddad thanks again you gave me a lot to think about and I’ve been doing good amounts of research on this as well. The truck I bought is extremely clean but the previous owner put 32’s on this 2wd shortbed, don’t know why? It looks like a 4wd as it sits but I will be changing wheels and tires, I think I’m gonna run the close ratio to see how I like it and maybe go to a 3.70 rear If needed, as far as cams I’m looking at the XE274HR and XE276HR they are close in duration but the xe276 has less lift, they are both 112 cams so my thinking is I can have the duration of the XE274HR cam with the lift of the XE270HR. What are your thoughts on the Comp XE276HR in a 351 build
Baddad thanks again you gave me a lot to think about and I’ve been doing good amounts of research on this as well. The truck I bought is extremely clean but the previous owner put 32’s on this 2wd shortbed, don’t know why? It looks like a 4wd as it sits but I will be changing wheels and tires, I think I’m gonna run the close ratio to see how I like it and maybe go to a 3.70 rear If needed, as far as cams I’m looking at the XE274HR and XE276HR they are close in duration but the xe276 has less lift, they are both 112 cams so my thinking is I can have the duration of the XE274HR cam with the lift of the XE270HR. What are your thoughts on the Comp XE276HR in a 351 build
The 276 is designed to run 1.7 rockers.(as is the 270HR) Run it with 1.6 and it's pretty much the same cam as a B303 run with 1.7's. B cams can be had for dirt cheap. Buy one for $60-100 and use the money left to buy a good set of roller rockers. I've run the B cam in a 302 with ported E7's and a Ford A321 intake topped with a 650 Holley. It turned on at around 1500 and pulled to 6500. In a 351 it would turn on around 1000 and with those heads you have pull to 6500. Those 32's are pretty tall probably too tall for the 2.32 1st gear. Be like my Ranger with 28's and my 2.78 1st run with 28's and 3.73's. Be a lot cheaper to just put shorter tires on it than regearing it with 3.70's