Notices
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

**** Recommend Engine? F100 ****

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 2, 2018 | 02:44 PM
  #16  
FuzzFace2's Avatar
FuzzFace2
FTE Legend
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 30,966
Likes: 4,130
From: Angier, NC
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Forum-Built-Ford
Greaaaat info guys! @Franklin2 (along with @FuzzFace2 ) totally nailed it. Both of you helped make one of the largest decisions for the forum truck. I would save a ton of money buying a donor truck. I'm going to look at 1989 F350 this afternoon. It's has a 460 4x4 with a C6. Would the 1982 F100 cab & bed mount on that? I'll probably have to shorten the frame as one of the guys recommended.

Is there actually a full size stepside... I've never seen one?
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
8' Flareside bed: 1956/79 F100/250 .. 9' Flareside bed: 1953/72 F350.

Flareside = Ford, a stepside is a Chevrolet.
As Bill pointed out not since 1979.
(Be warned I am not normal)
Now what I would look into is how the flare side bed sides are, sides rust the lip away at the wood bed floor.
The other thing is the cross members, what shape are they in?
What shape is the wood in?
If the cross members are good you would need 1 more for the long frame.
Then when fixing the flare side lips see about making them longer to match the trucks frame, longer wood to make a long bed flare side bed.

Or (the not normal part) maybe cut the style side bed sides off leaving the metal floor only.
You would still need to make longer bed sides and bolt them on the metal floor.
Be warned it is not really that easy of just bolting the side on as the rear sill will need work to fit the gate.
I know as I shorten a style side long bed metal floor to work for my short bed flare side and it looks factory stock.


Still doing body work to bed before painting the truck.

Yes the truck does have duel tanks, more not normal LOL
Dave ----
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2018 | 04:35 PM
  #17  
Rusty_S's Avatar
Rusty_S
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,958
Likes: 105
From: Houston
I thought of doing the dual tank mod on mine drop the spare tire and get one of those 50 gallon rear tanks from Summit. Problem is I hate those switching valves they always seem to screw up.

Not only that but I hate the thought of cutting into the fiberglass fender be my luck the fender will get messed up.

Think if I did the big fuel tank mod I might drill a hole in the wood bed and put a filler for the rear tank in the bed with one of those flush pop up fillers.
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2018 | 05:20 PM
  #18  
FuzzFace2's Avatar
FuzzFace2
FTE Legend
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 30,966
Likes: 4,130
From: Angier, NC
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Rusty_S
I thought of doing the dual tank mod on mine drop the spare tire and get one of those 50 gallon rear tanks from Summit. Problem is I hate those switching valves they always seem to screw up.

Not only that but I hate the thought of cutting into the fiberglass fender be my luck the fender will get messed up.

Think if I did the big fuel tank mod I might drill a hole in the wood bed and put a filler for the rear tank in the bed with one of those flush pop up fillers.
If I ever think I need more fuel over the 16 & 19 gal tanks I will do the 38 gal take and lose the spare tire also.

Funny you say that on the fender. I don't know what I did when measuring but it is not centered on the fender. Don't remember but I think it is a little lower and that worked out good for the filler hose routing.
And I am sure I measured 3 or more times LOL.

On the switching valve mine only has the 3 hoses, 1 from each tank & 1 out to the pump, pretty simple.
I don't know if the valve works or even if the switch works yet but I think they both can be gotten ... I hope if I need them!
So others know the trucks main wiring harness is different between trucks having duel tanks or not. Also the cross member just in front of the rear tank is also different if it has a rear tank or not.
I was lucky all the parts came from my parts truck.
Dave -----
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2018 | 06:03 PM
  #19  
Rusty_S's Avatar
Rusty_S
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,958
Likes: 105
From: Houston
Originally Posted by FuzzFace2
If I ever think I need more fuel over the 16 & 19 gal tanks I will do the 38 gal take and lose the spare tire also.

Funny you say that on the fender. I don't know what I did when measuring but it is not centered on the fender. Don't remember but I think it is a little lower and that worked out good for the filler hose routing.
And I am sure I measured 3 or more times LOL.

On the switching valve mine only has the 3 hoses, 1 from each tank & 1 out to the pump, pretty simple.
I don't know if the valve works or even if the switch works yet but I think they both can be gotten ... I hope if I need them!
So others know the trucks main wiring harness is different between trucks having duel tanks or not. Also the cross member just in front of the rear tank is also different if it has a rear tank or not.
I was lucky all the parts came from my parts truck.
Dave -----
Yep that's why I am trying to get my new engine planned out cause I don't want 10 mpg city anymore if possible. Just no distance in this truck with a 16 gallon fuel tank. Which reminds me I need to pull my sender out I bent the arm up a little to give me a reserve when it hits E but apparently I bent it up too much as when I am on E I can only get between 9 and 10 gallons in the tank. I also remember it took 5 gallons to get the gauge to move. Need to pull it out and bend it back to stock. Or just try and track down the OEM part number and get a NOS sender. Think there is one on ebay for like $200.
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2018 | 08:01 PM
  #20  
FuzzFace2's Avatar
FuzzFace2
FTE Legend
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 30,966
Likes: 4,130
From: Angier, NC
Club FTE Gold Member
I know most that list the sender for the 16 gal list the same one for the 19 gal side tank also.
How can this be so? Think it was Gary that pointed this out to me. I cant remember if LMC list them right or not?

I think in my thread I list who I got my senders, 16 & 19, from. Think 1AAuto.com but not 100% sure.
I have the boxes in the garage and can look at part numbers on them if you need me to look.
This is for my 81 but your 82 could be the same.
http://www.1aauto.com/search?q=fuel+...981&model=1522
Dave ----
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2018 | 10:07 AM
  #21  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 57,014
Likes: 2,751
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Forum-Built-Ford
Greaaaat info guys! @Franklin2 (along with @FuzzFace2 ) totally nailed it. Both of you helped make one of the largest decisions for the forum truck. I would save a ton of money buying a donor truck. I'm going to look at 1989 F350 this afternoon. It's has a 460 4x4 with a C6. Would the 1982 F100 cab & bed mount on that? I'll probably have to shorten the frame as one of the guys recommended.

Is there actually a full size stepside... I've never seen one?
They did make the 8 ft beds with the fenders in the 70's and earlier. Not a very good look in my opinion though. I would keep the short bed and shorten the f350 frame myself. Take a look under the front of the 89 f350, it should have a dana 60 straight front axle. That is a very desirable axle, and can bring $800-$1000 just by itself.

The earlier cab will bolt on, along with the frontend. The only problem might be the early front bumper, it will probably not be a direct bolt on to the later frame. You could go with a custom winch bumper for a 89 if you didn't care about having the original early front bumper on there. The shorter wheelbase of your planned custom truck will be better for off-roading and tight maneuvering in the woods.
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2018 | 11:03 AM
  #22  
Rusty_S's Avatar
Rusty_S
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,958
Likes: 105
From: Houston
Originally Posted by FuzzFace2
I know most that list the sender for the 16 gal list the same one for the 19 gal side tank also.
How can this be so? Think it was Gary that pointed this out to me. I cant remember if LMC list them right or not?

I think in my thread I list who I got my senders, 16 & 19, from. Think 1AAuto.com but not 100% sure.
I have the boxes in the garage and can look at part numbers on them if you need me to look.
This is for my 81 but your 82 could be the same.
http://www.1aauto.com/search?q=fuel+...981&model=1522
Dave ----
The resistance for Ford fuel gauges are the same up to 85. in 86 they changed it and flipped the resistance. I ran into this on a '82 F150 at work we put a 5.0 coyote in. We put a '86 saddle tank in it the 18 gallon long bed version so we could use a in tank fuel pump to supply the fuel injected engine. We also got a '86 sender but with no gas in it was pegged past Full. Did some reading found '85 was the last year for the same resistance. So I think the senders are the same as the difference in the 16 and 18 gallon tanks is length not height.
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2018 | 11:04 AM
  #23  
Rusty_S's Avatar
Rusty_S
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,958
Likes: 105
From: Houston
Originally Posted by Franklin2
They did make the 8 ft beds with the fenders in the 70's and earlier. Not a very good look in my opinion though. I would keep the short bed and shorten the f350 frame myself. Take a look under the front of the 89 f350, it should have a dana 60 straight front axle. That is a very desirable axle, and can bring $800-$1000 just by itself.

The earlier cab will bolt on, along with the frontend. The only problem might be the early front bumper, it will probably not be a direct bolt on to the later frame. You could go with a custom winch bumper for a 89 if you didn't care about having the original early front bumper on there. The shorter wheelbase of your planned custom truck will be better for off-roading and tight maneuvering in the woods.
Probably like the long bed chevy step side C10`s, they look ugly as hell as the bed is just way too long. Fenders are the same size though all they did was put a longer step in the front and its like damn that's ugly.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-2

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-7

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jun 3, 2018 | 01:01 PM
  #24  
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Moderator
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 57,014
Likes: 2,751
From: Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Rusty_S
The resistance for Ford fuel gauges are the same up to 85. in 86 they changed it and flipped the resistance. I ran into this on a '82 F150 at work we put a 5.0 coyote in. We put a '86 saddle tank in it the 18 gallon long bed version so we could use a in tank fuel pump to supply the fuel injected engine. We also got a '86 sender but with no gas in it was pegged past Full. Did some reading found '85 was the last year for the same resistance. So I think the senders are the same as the difference in the 16 and 18 gallon tanks is length not height.
Interesting you found the resistance changed in 85, it seems we always though the resistance changed with the dash change, which was 87. They went to a completely different style gauge electrically in 87 or 88, I would have though that would be when they changed the sending unit also.
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2018 | 06:28 PM
  #25  
Rusty_S's Avatar
Rusty_S
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,958
Likes: 105
From: Houston
Originally Posted by Franklin2
Interesting you found the resistance changed in 85, it seems we always though the resistance changed with the dash change, which was 87. They went to a completely different style gauge electrically in 87 or 88, I would have though that would be when they changed the sending unit also.
Yep strangely enough the sending units were different in 85 but the resistance value stayed the same. 84 used the small sending unit for mechanical fuel pump. 85 they switched to the large sending unit with the pump attached. We thought it was 86 was first year so we ordered the stuff for an 86. Found the gauge was wrong did some digging and found 80 - 85 the resistance was the same.

Got a 85 sending unit installed our performance fox body era fuel pump to feed the 5.0 coyote and the oem 82 fuel gauge reads perfectly. Only thing he complains about is its hard to fill up. Sorry but there was nothing to hook the original vent tube in the tank to, to keep it in place. That's a down side to doing this upgrade.
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2018 | 08:24 PM
  #26  
FuzzFace2's Avatar
FuzzFace2
FTE Legend
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 30,966
Likes: 4,130
From: Angier, NC
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Rusty_S
The resistance for Ford fuel gauges are the same up to 85. in 86 they changed it and flipped the resistance. I ran into this on a '82 F150 at work we put a 5.0 coyote in. We put a '86 saddle tank in it the 18 gallon long bed version so we could use a in tank fuel pump to supply the fuel injected engine. We also got a '86 sender but with no gas in it was pegged past Full. Did some reading found '85 was the last year for the same resistance. So I think the senders are the same as the difference in the 16 and 18 gallon tanks is length not height.
The resistance may be the same between the 16 & 18 gal senders but not the ratios in the float arm swing.
I will not know if mine will read right or not till I get it on the road and fuel in the tanks.
Dave ----
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2018 | 08:38 PM
  #27  
Rusty_S's Avatar
Rusty_S
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,958
Likes: 105
From: Houston
Originally Posted by FuzzFace2
The resistance may be the same between the 16 & 18 gal senders but not the ratios in the float arm swing.
I will not know if mine will read right or not till I get it on the road and fuel in the tanks.
Dave ----
Correct in some instances. For a 18 gallon tank it is not wider or taller it is just longer than the 16 gallon tank so thus the sender wouldn't move any more it just will take more fuel before it will move. In this case half a tank is still half a tank.

But now like on my dads 79 El Camino the dimensions are the same externally but the tanks are two different capacities now in this case the sending unit will make a difference to read properly.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Joe Hawdon
Performance & General Engine Building
14
Oct 6, 2015 03:33 PM
marcsmithracing
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
14
Apr 4, 2009 05:48 AM
TheLastRebel
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
13
Oct 23, 2004 05:54 AM
project460
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
Feb 11, 2000 10:49 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 PM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE