Brake Setup Recommendations
I am going to order the nicopp line, and brake bending tools this weekend.
The truck came with manual brakes, and I have seen builds on here that stayed manual brakes but upgraded to wilwood parts and loved it.
What should I do? Keep stock and just run new lines, or upgrade? Feel free to share brands and parts, this is the first time I will be doing brakes from scratch.
Thanks folks
Dual diaphragm booster on my '69 F100 with a 1-1/16" bore '95 Ford Explorer MC.
Same setup I installed on a friend's '72 F100.
....setup I'm currently working on in a friend's '65 F100: (mockup) dual diaphragm booster with a '95 Ford Explorer MC. The actual booster that will be installed will be built by Prior Automotive (in Dallas, TX) tomorrow (Monday) and shipped to me this coming week.
The dual diaphragm booster can be bought through Prior Automotive under part number 3700131. Specify a dual diaphragm booster for a '68-'72 F350 with front discs and an adjustable booster input rod code of "FT8."
The 1-1/16" bore MC for a 1995 Ford Explorer (without cruise control/without proportioning valve) can be purchased through NAPA under part number NMC M3246.
The MC will require (1) 10M x 1.00 metric bubble flare fitting and (1) 12M x 1.00 metric bubble flare fitting. These fittings can be purchased through Classic Tube under the part numbers ST8036 and ST8040, respectively.
We are doing something similar on my dads '85 we are building. We will use the factory booster from the truck and the MC from the donor car (Mercury Grand Marquis, same car as Crown Vic). His truck is CV swapped and we installed a 8.8 with discs on the rear and are using a Wilwood prop valve.
Is there benefit to using the explorer setup over one of these kits? Or is it just cheaper?
I don't know what MC you're specifically referencing but, I presume it's a reproduction Corvette cast iron MC. Port configuration on them is backwards, compared to a Ford MC and, the Corvette MC is only available in two bore diameters: 1.00" or 1-1/8".
The Explorer MC is a Ford MC designed to fit the 3-3/16" spacing of the mounting studs on the booster, has a 1-1/16" bore diameter, the body is constructed of light weight aluminum, weighs about 1/4th of what the Corvette cast iron MC weighs, the Explorer MC doesn't rust (inside or out) and doesn't require removal of the cap to see what the brake fluid level is inside the reservoir.
Removing the cap introduces air, dirt/contaminants and worst of all moisture into the brake system. The less the cap has to be taken off the MC, the less polluted the brake fluid/system becomes.
If the Bendix booster or Explorer MC ever failed, you could get a replacement booster or MC from the parts store by the very next morning. In the case of an aftermarket booster failure, it would be several days before you would receive a replacement and you wouldn't be able to get it through any of the parts store chains.
I don't know what MC you're specifically referencing but, I presume it's a reproduction Corvette cast iron MC. Port configuration on them is backwards, compared to a Ford MC and, the Corvette MC is only available in two bore diameters: 1.00" or 1-1/8".
The Explorer MC is a Ford MC designed to fit the 3-3/16" spacing of the mounting studs on the booster, has a 1-1/16" bore diameter, the body is constructed of light weight aluminum, weighs about 1/4th of what the Corvette cast iron MC weighs, the Explorer MC doesn't rust (inside or out) and doesn't require removal of the cap to see what the brake fluid level is inside the reservoir.
Removing the cap introduces air, dirt/contaminants and worst of all moisture into the brake system. The less the cap has to be taken off the MC, the less polluted the brake fluid/system becomes.
If the Bendix booster or Explorer MC ever failed, you could get a replacement booster or MC from the parts store by the very next morning. In the case of an aftermarket booster failure, it would be several days before you would receive a replacement and you wouldn't be able to get it through any of the parts store chains.
Follow up question: are there some kits out there for fittings to make life easier? and is 3/16" line still a good choice for this setup?
Trending Topics
3/16" diameter tubing is the standard size line that was stock on the trucks.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
NOTE: The brackets from a bellcrank (cantilever) style brake booster is not compatible with this style brake booster.
Brackets and dust boot needed to install the type booster I have in my '69 F100.
Bellcrank style brackets on a single diaphragm booster (different configuration, not compatible with this style dual diaphragm booster).
Scroll down page to see the booster mounting brackets.
Flashback F100's - New Products This page has new parts that have just come on the market
I don't know of anyone that reproduces the plastic dust boost for a Bumpside/Dentside truck brake booster. There is a reproduction plastic boot being made for GM vehicles (possibly for Camaro ???) that is sort of similar to the Bumpside/Dentside dust boot. I don't know how close it is and if it would actually work but, it's possible it might work.
.....the '68-'72 F350, FT8 adjustable input rod, dual diaphragm booster arrived today, from Prior Automotive in Dallas, TX that I'll be installing on my friend's '65 F100.
The '65 F100 has the same problem as a '67 Bumpside and that problem is the brake/clutch pedal pivot (fulcrum) is positioned further forward on the pedal support, closer to the firewall than where the pedal pivot is located on the '68-'72 Bumpside pedal support.
The eyelet of the booster input rod projects rearward, past the connection point on the '67-earlier brake pedal, by a good margin. --on a '67 Bumpside, the problem could be resolved by installing a pedal support and pedal(s) from a '68-'72 model Bumpside.
I pretty much had 3 choices to install this booster in the '65 F100: [1] I could have cut a section out of the input rod, threaded it and used a coupling nut to rejoin the eyelet to the input rod (didn't really want to resort to that). If the booster ever had to be replaced, the input rod on the replacement booster would have to be modified as well and would not be a direct bolt-in. Not interested in that hassle.
[2] Take the pedal support out, remove the pedals, knock the potmetal pivot bushings out of the pedal support, drop back the appropriate distance rearward on the support, drill a new hole all the way through both sides and install ball bearings --like the bearings I installed on this '72 F100 pedal support --although I didn't move the position of where the fulcrum pivot point was originally located. I just got rid of the sloppy potmetal bushing and installed much better and smoother ball bearings in their place. This would be fine on a truck with an automatic transmission, if you were having to move the pivot location rearward to line up with the booster input rod. On a truck with a manual, other modifications would probably have to be made to the clutch pedal and/or the release rod connection point at the clutch pedal, if the pivot location of the pedals was being moved back.
Or, choice #3 which is the one I decided on and is the one I was working on at my job today and that was to fabricate a spacer to place on the firewall to push the booster/brackets further forward, so the eyelet of the booster input rod would line up with the bolt hole on the brake pedal, with the brake pedal in its stock location on the '65 F100.
These are two 3/4" thick plates of 6061 T6 aluminum, stacked together, for a combined total of 1.500" thick. To put the eyelet of the booster where it needed to be, I had to have a spacer thickness of 1.245". ....soooo, I milled the back plate down to achieve an overall thickness of 1.245" and then bolted the two plates together from the back with a pair of counter-sunk Allen screws.
I still have to bore out the large hole in the center for the input rod to pass through and for the dust boost to go between the front of the spacer and the back of the booster but, I wanted to fit the spacer up and make sure it would line up with the four holes on the firewall/pedal support.
It had the linkage/bellcrank from the pedal to the booster.
I got everything from the doner.
pedal.pedal support bracket.linkage.booster to fire wall brackets
Doing a crown vic swap.
9 inch rear getting disks










