Notices

1st time for this

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2018 | 05:10 PM
  #1  
bentwrench28's Avatar
bentwrench28
Thread Starter
|
4wd Low
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: So. Indiana
1st time for this

"store bought" long block (5.8) with almost 8,000 miles started out as a miss so I started out with a basic tune up also ran compression while changing plugs all cylinders had 150-154#. Went for a test drive and things got worse even started a light popping out of intake. When I took out 1st set of plugs all looked the same no concerns. I now take out plugs and #4 is black. re-compression, all same. Checked for spark at plug and that was good. Fired up in the shop with air intake tubes off and intake back fire really got worse so off with valve cover and intake............







First time I've had a lifter wear down 3/16" no wear marks on sides so doesn't appear to have been sticking. Valve is free and cam lobe looks good. Just makes me nervous to put in new lifter and put all back together.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2018 | 10:39 PM
  #2  
Beanscoot's Avatar
Beanscoot
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 36
From: British Columbia
Cynical me is going to guess Chinese part with improper heat treatment.
The corresponding camshaft lobe is probably going to be damaged as well.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2018 | 08:46 AM
  #3  
Filthy Beast's Avatar
Filthy Beast
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 7
From: Taxachusetts
Never seen that before, either. I would suggest you have the wrong lifters for your application. A lifter wouldn't just magically shrink like that without some sort of catastrophic event.

Double check your lifter application for that particular engine.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2018 | 08:58 PM
  #4  
bentwrench28's Avatar
bentwrench28
Thread Starter
|
4wd Low
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: So. Indiana
After looking, measuring, and checking I've decided to go with junk lifters with bad heat treating, No visual damage to cam lobes and measurements appear to be good. Working in the truck is alittle tough and this is #4 exhaust. Going to try a better check tomorrow with a dial indicator. About half of the rest show signs of bad wear.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2018 | 11:51 PM
  #5  
Beanscoot's Avatar
Beanscoot
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 36
From: British Columbia
Amazing that the cam lobe is okay.
That lifter must be really soft.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2018 | 09:35 AM
  #6  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
Originally Posted by Filthy Beast
Never seen that before, either. I would suggest you have the wrong lifters for your application. A lifter wouldn't just magically shrink like that without some sort of catastrophic event.

Double check your lifter application for that particular engine.
Have you ever looked to see how many lifters there are for Ford engines ? There are basically two diameters. And a short lifter would not work to start with, the pushrod would have to be longer to have it work, especially to last 8000 miles.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2018 | 09:56 AM
  #7  
Filthy Beast's Avatar
Filthy Beast
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 7
From: Taxachusetts
Originally Posted by baddad457
Have you ever looked to see how many lifters there are for Ford engines ? There are basically two diameters. And a short lifter would not work to start with, the pushrod would have to be longer to have it work, especially to last 8000 miles.
I'm aware that there are a few different lifters for various engines, from mechanical to hydraulic. Should be able to ask a dealer what size, etc, lifters would be needed for this vehicle. I don't see the problem here.

So, what are you saying? That this lifter magically shrunk in size...or was wrong to begin with and someone used longer pushrods to compensate?
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2018 | 10:32 AM
  #8  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
Originally Posted by Filthy Beast
I'm aware that there are a few different lifters for various engines, from mechanical to hydraulic. Should be able to ask a dealer what size, etc, lifters would be needed for this vehicle. I don't see the problem here.

So, what are you saying? That this lifter magically shrunk in size...or was wrong to begin with and someone used longer pushrods to compensate?
We're on two different planes here. I figured you thought he had a different diameter or length lifter to start with. Pushrod Fords used two diameters, .874 or .875. Obviously a roller lifter wasn't used here. Possibly a solid lifter could have been used but the racket from it would have been a dead giveaway from the start that something was amiss. The lifter was obviously too soft, thus the wear over 8K miles. Nothing magical about that. Last I read nobody makes flat tappet lifters in the USA any more, nor have they for 20 years. They're all made overseas. Thus the poor quality control. Most wipe out during break-in. I've had two do this, a single lifter in each of two engines.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Feb 23, 2018 | 10:42 AM
  #9  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
Originally Posted by bentwrench28
After looking, measuring, and checking I've decided to go with junk lifters with bad heat treating, No visual damage to cam lobes and measurements appear to be good. Working in the truck is alittle tough and this is #4 exhaust. Going to try a better check tomorrow with a dial indicator. About half of the rest show signs of bad wear.
No way I'd chance using that cam again. No matter what the lobes look like. Inspect the new lifters next time before dropping them in. The bottoms should be convex (slightly domed). Also make sure they spin freely in their bores after they go in. After starting it, watch the pushrods to make certain all are rotating, if any are not, you'll wipe another during break-in. I would seriously consider converting to rollers.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2018 | 11:34 AM
  #10  
Filthy Beast's Avatar
Filthy Beast
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 7
From: Taxachusetts
Ok, baddad457... Got you covered on your explanation, and agree completely. Argentina, MeHeeco are some places I know of where lifters are made. Agree on lackadaisical QCC.

On one lifter goin' south on breakin-how do you explain that? Lousy lifter to begin with? I check 'em all for holding oil pressure, but I'm not aware of a test to determine metal fatigue......

I had one lifter that gave up the ghost on a 350 Chubby that came in the shop....the others weren't that far behind. Here, on the nose spring pressure was out of spec when I checked it, hence the problem....
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2018 | 02:01 PM
  #11  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
Originally Posted by Filthy Beast
Ok, baddad457... Got you covered on your explanation, and agree completely. Argentina, MeHeeco are some places I know of where lifters are made. Agree on lackadaisical QCC.

On one lifter goin' south on breakin-how do you explain that? Lousy lifter to begin with? I check 'em all for holding oil pressure, but I'm not aware of a test to determine metal fatigue......

I had one lifter that gave up the ghost on a 350 Chubby that came in the shop....the others weren't that far behind. Here, on the nose spring pressure was out of spec when I checked it, hence the problem....
One bad lifter ? Poor QC in the manufacturing process. If the bottom face isn't machined to spec (they're slightly convex, not flat) that along will prevent the lobe from setting it into motion, rotating in it's bore. This rotation, combined with the correct lubrication is what restricts the wear between the two surfaces. As for a "soft" lifter, there's nothing I know of for you to detect this. That once again is the realm of the QC process in manufacturing. The two failures I had were both a single lifter and lobe wiping out during break-in. One possibly could have happened due to the temps outside when I fired it off (30*F) making the oil too thick to allow the lifter to rotate in it's bore. The other, I'm sure was due to a bad lifter in retrospect.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2018 | 07:28 PM
  #12  
Filthy Beast's Avatar
Filthy Beast
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 7
From: Taxachusetts
Again, got you covered on the mechanics and function of the lifters. The clearance between the lifters and their bore is arguably the tightest of the whole engine's clearances. Even a spec of booger between the lifter and bore could wreak havoc.....

Not to highjack this thread but I have a question for you regarding the failure(s) of those two single lifters.....Do you recall where their placement was? I mean were they just after the second cam journal -from the front looking toward the back of the engine?

This is just a baffling fact that has me at a loss as to an explanation why. Three cam/lifters (over the years) that I have seen that got pooched -two during break-in and one about 500 miles after break-in - all had one failed lifter in that position....just after the second from the front cam journal.

I have a thought as to why, but failed lifters are not the norm when I build an engine...as, I'm sure, is the same with you.....so far, so good....
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2018 | 08:09 PM
  #13  
bentwrench28's Avatar
bentwrench28
Thread Starter
|
4wd Low
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: So. Indiana
OK I guess we are all smart enough to know that when 2 metal parts run together if one wears there is a good chance both will. Number 4 exhaust lobe is .062 short!
First lesson learnt don't try to cut corners and by a parts store rebuild. I knew better just don't have access to the engine shop I used years ago. Not much for trashing people but this motor was bought from Advance Auto it is a Spartan rebuild.
Now to decide how to go on repair. This is in a decent F250 4X4 with a C6 I use it almost daily it just doesn't go far. This engine has 8,000 miles in 5 years does lots of chores around the property. But I do need it to make a trip occasionally. I also have a bad habit of not leaving everything stock. So I know you guys have more experience with this generation of gas burner than me so give me a couple opinions.


 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2018 | 08:20 PM
  #14  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
Originally Posted by Filthy Beast
Again, got you covered on the mechanics and function of the lifters. The clearance between the lifters and their bore is arguably the tightest of the whole engine's clearances. Even a spec of booger between the lifter and bore could wreak havoc.....

Not to highjack this thread but I have a question for you regarding the failure(s) of those two single lifters.....Do you recall where their placement was? I mean were they just after the second cam journal -from the front looking toward the back of the engine?

This is just a baffling fact that has me at a loss as to an explanation why. Three cam/lifters (over the years) that I have seen that got pooched -two during break-in and one about 500 miles after break-in - all had one failed lifter in that position....just after the second from the front cam journal.

I have a thought as to why, but failed lifters are not the norm when I build an engine...as, I'm sure, is the same with you.....so far, so good....
I don't recall the exact position, but do recall both were exhaust lobes. After break-in both caused a backfire thru the carb when the intake valve opened
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2018 | 08:27 PM
  #15  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
Originally Posted by bentwrench28
OK I guess we are all smart enough to know that when 2 metal parts run together if one wears there is a good chance both will. Number 4 exhaust lobe is .062 short!
First lesson learnt don't try to cut corners and by a parts store rebuild. I knew better just don't have access to the engine shop I used years ago. Not much for trashing people but this motor was bought from Advance Auto it is a Spartan rebuild.
Now to decide how to go on repair. This is in a decent F250 4X4 with a C6 I use it almost daily it just doesn't go far. This engine has 8,000 miles in 5 years does lots of chores around the property. But I do need it to make a trip occasionally. I also have a bad habit of not leaving everything stock. So I know you guys have more experience with this generation of gas burner than me so give me a couple opinions.


Both of the engines I had failures in, I pulled the intake manifolds then completely flushed the internals to get the metal out. Also flushed the oiling system with gasoline to clean that out. ( don't smoke ! )To do this I filled the oil pan with gas, then spun the starter over to operate the pump. I cranked it a minute or two, then drained the gas and changed the filter. After break-in again, I changed the oil and filter. Ran it a hundred miles then changed oil and filter again. After flushing I then replaced the cam and lifters. Both ran for a couple years afterwards before selling both with no ill effects
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 AM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE