1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Slick Sixties Ford Truck

1963 f100 rear lowering question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-15-2017, 11:12 AM
JacobM1985's Avatar
JacobM1985
JacobM1985 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1963 f100 rear lowering question

Hello!
This is my first post on this forum. I am new to the world of old trucks. Mainly have messed around with old motorcycles, but found a 63 f100 short box, and picked it up a month or so ago. It is "mid project," status. Meaning the previous owner had started various things about it, and I am hoping to educate myself and finish it. First question that I have, is the front end was lowered, as well as the rear via leaf springs. I was wanting to lower the rear end just another inch or two to level everything out. I have read and viewed widows on installing lowering shackles. That seems to be the simplest approach for that last inch or two. My problem is that I can't seem to find anything for a 1963. I can only find for a 1965 and newer. Does anyone know where I could find such a shackle? Or would one for a 1965 possibly fit?
Thank you in advance for your help and suggestions,
-Jacob
 
  #2  
Old 11-15-2017, 11:30 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 648 Likes on 543 Posts
Originally Posted by JacobM1985
This is my first post on this forum. I am new to the world of old trucks. Mainly have messed around with old motorcycles, but found a 63 F100 short box, and picked it up a month or so ago.
Welcome to FTE
 
  #3  
Old 11-15-2017, 03:47 PM
charliemccraney's Avatar
charliemccraney
charliemccraney is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
If it is already a coupe inches lower, then you cannot go any lower correctly without a lot more expense. The reason is that there will not be enough clearance between the frame for suspension travel.

Even only a few inches lower, where it probably is now, requires shock mounting points to be revised. The reason for that is as you lower it, the shock moves from a vertical to a more horizontal position, reducing it's effectiveness significantly. The lower you go, the worse this gets.
 
  #4  
Old 11-16-2017, 11:09 AM
JacobM1985's Avatar
JacobM1985
JacobM1985 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemccraney
If it is already a coupe inches lower, then you cannot go any lower correctly without a lot more expense. The reason is that there will not be enough clearance between the frame for suspension travel.

Even only a few inches lower, where it probably is now, requires shock mounting points to be revised. The reason for that is as you lower it, the shock moves from a vertical to a more horizontal position, reducing it's effectiveness significantly. The lower you go, the worse this gets.
Forgive my lack of knowledge, as I am completely new to all of this! A follow up to lowering it, was recommended that I add shorter shocks. Would this help the cause of it being lowered and its effectiveness? And for future references, if anyone knows, will later year leaf shackles fit a 63?
 
  #5  
Old 11-16-2017, 11:10 AM
JacobM1985's Avatar
JacobM1985
JacobM1985 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
Welcome to FTE
Thank you!
 
  #6  
Old 11-16-2017, 11:39 AM
charliemccraney's Avatar
charliemccraney
charliemccraney is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Shorter shocks will do no good without relocating shock mounting points. Otherwise the angle of the shock will be the same, no matter what length it is to begin with.
 
  #7  
Old 11-17-2017, 03:27 PM
charliemccraney's Avatar
charliemccraney
charliemccraney is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
I need to clarify what I said about the shocks. I'm talking about the rear shocks when I say that the mounting points need to be revised. Front should be ok though a shorter shock may be a good idea there - that depends on how the shock works internally, which I don't know about. There should be no threat of bottoming out a stock front shock since maximum compression will remain the same, at least until the point at which you are notching the frame to get really low.
I'm using Gabriel Ultra G63187 up front which is about 1 3/4" shorter than the stock shock. The truck is 2 1/2" to 3" lower all around. My axle housing is not stock, so the shocks I'm using there will not help you much.
Most shock manufacturers have the specs for the shocks in their catalog so with some due diligence, you can measure and make sure you get a shock which extends and compresses enough and has the right ends, for whatever setup you run. Ideally, you want to pick a shock from a similar vehicle.
 
  #8  
Old 11-19-2017, 10:02 PM
JacobM1985's Avatar
JacobM1985
JacobM1985 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemccraney
I need to clarify what I said about the shocks. I'm talking about the rear shocks when I say that the mounting points need to be revised. Front should be ok though a shorter shock may be a good idea there - that depends on how the shock works internally, which I don't know about. There should be no threat of bottoming out a stock front shock since maximum compression will remain the same, at least until the point at which you are notching the frame to get really low.
I'm using Gabriel Ultra G63187 up front which is about 1 3/4" shorter than the stock shock. The truck is 2 1/2" to 3" lower all around. My axle housing is not stock, so the shocks I'm using there will not help you much.
Most shock manufacturers have the specs for the shocks in their catalog so with some due diligence, you can measure and make sure you get a shock which extends and compresses enough and has the right ends, for whatever setup you run. Ideally, you want to pick a shock from a similar vehicle.
Thank you for all of that information! I appreciate that. I am assuming at this point since its about 3" lower all around, the stock shock position isn't the best. I currently have a few things to button up before I address the suspension in the rear, but will look further into it. The truck does seem a bit "soft" so I will look into shorter/stiffer shocks up front and possibly in the rear when the time comes.
Thank you again for all of the info!
-Jacob
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mnkeeking
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
11-16-2012 03:40 PM
1970460
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
01-10-2012 08:41 AM
gt40racing
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
09-13-2006 08:16 AM
VW94Jetta311
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
10-23-2004 12:12 PM
aharrell
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
05-29-2003 11:02 AM



Quick Reply: 1963 f100 rear lowering question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 PM.