Notices
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Slick Sixties Ford Truck

64' Power Brake Conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 15, 2017 | 04:25 PM
  #1  
SixtyFour's Avatar
SixtyFour
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 199
Likes: 1
From: Berkeley, CA
64' Power Brake Conversion

Hey everyone,

Just bought a '64 F100 a month ago. Previous owner installed a power booster, bracket and master cylinder from a '72 F250 2wd.

Right now the brake pedal sits very high compared to the gas and clutch. My guess is that the booster push rod that connects to the pedal is too long. Otherwise the brakes operate very well. Just a high pedal.

Looking under the dash I don't see any way to adjust this pushrod to move the pedal closer to the floor. Then looking on RockAuto I see there's two options for '72 power boosters and one with an adjustable push rod (A-1 CARDONE 5473515) and one without.

Does anyone thing this could be my solve? Also looking at the pic of the booster, does something thread into the opening that would connect to my pedal?

Link to the rockauto part: More Information for A-1 CARDONE 5473515

Thanks in advance!
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2017 | 01:33 PM
  #2  
SixtyFour's Avatar
SixtyFour
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 199
Likes: 1
From: Berkeley, CA
Ok so I did some more digging and I realized the PO did put in the booster I linked above as it does have the threaded input rod. Problem is it the rod is just too long.

Here's some pics...

Really high pedal:

Name:  IMG_8169.JPG
Views: 2234
Size:  745.2 KB

Name:  IMG_8170.JPG
Views: 2326
Size:  921.4 KB

Input rod/brake pedal:

Name:  IMG_8166.JPG
Views: 2216
Size:  860.3 KB

Booster:

Name:  IMG_8163.JPG
Views: 2222
Size:  710.1 KB

So all that figured out I think I might try to go for a booster like this (assuming it can mate up to the booster bracket i have)

Tuff Stuff 2229NC: 9" Brake Booster Dual Diaphragm | JEGS

Then I can put on one of these to get the right pedal height

Tuff Stuff 4750: Pedal Rod Extension Kit 4pc Includes: | JEGS

I've never replaced a booster before but it seems rather straight forward. Any advice?

Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2017 | 01:48 PM
  #3  
Crop Duster's Avatar
Crop Duster
Logistics Pro
Veteran: Air Force
10 Year Member
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 4,468
Likes: 962
From: Tri Cities, TN
Club FTE Silver Member

It's possible all you actually need is the brake pedal from a 1972 truck. I'm not positive about that but my 65 truck has a 1979 booster and the 79 pedal and it is about where it should be.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2017 | 01:58 PM
  #4  
SixtyFour's Avatar
SixtyFour
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 199
Likes: 1
From: Berkeley, CA
Mind getting me a sideview pic of your pedal like mine above?

I see one on ebay right now for $50....hard to tell if the curve is better or what about the design would make it sit better.

1973 - 1979 Ford Truck 4X4 Power Brake Pedal Assembly | eBay
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2017 | 04:10 AM
  #5  
Crop Duster's Avatar
Crop Duster
Logistics Pro
Veteran: Air Force
10 Year Member
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 4,468
Likes: 962
From: Tri Cities, TN
Club FTE Silver Member

Brake pedal

This pedal is marked with engineering # D7TA-MA, PWR it is for an auto trans. You will likely need one for a standard trans. I suggest contacting this guy and see if he has what you need Flashback F100's - Home
He has taken a bunch of trucks apart and knows a lot about what fits what.
 
Attached Images   
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2017 | 10:50 AM
  #6  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
1973/79 F100/350:

There are TWENTY TWO different brake pedals, NINETEEN different P/B boosters, SEVENTEEN different master cylinders, SEVEN different clutch pedals, I kid you not!

Whatever booster is used must match the brake pedal.
--------------------------------------------------------------
1968/72 F100/350:

There is ONE brake pedal, ONE clutch pedal, with/without P/B makes no difference.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2017 | 11:18 AM
  #7  
SixtyFour's Avatar
SixtyFour
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 199
Likes: 1
From: Berkeley, CA
Crop Duster: thanks for the link I will check out the site. Though it seems to be down right now.

NumberDummy: are you saying it's as simple as getting a '72 pedal to match my '72 F250 Booster/Master?
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2017 | 11:31 AM
  #8  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by SixtyFour
Crop Duster: thanks for the link I will check out the site. Though it seems to be down right now.

NumberDummy: are you saying it's as simple as getting a '72 pedal to match my '72 F250 Booster/Master?
I gave you the brake pedal info, but did not say a 1968/72 pedal will work on a 1964.

AFAIK, it will not work. 1964's use different master cylinders and related parts than 1965 and later.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Sep 26, 2017 | 03:31 PM
  #9  
SixtyFour's Avatar
SixtyFour
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 199
Likes: 1
From: Berkeley, CA
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
I gave you the brake pedal info, but did not say a 1968/72 pedal will work on a 1964.

AFAIK, it will not work. 1964's use different master cylinders and related parts than 1965 and later.
You gave me the info that there's an insane number of combos for 73-79 trucks. Not really sure what to do with that at this time.

As far as the '72 pedal in my '64 - as I mentioned I have a master cylinder and master combo from a '72 in my '64. The only stock '64 part left in the brake linkage is the pedal.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2017 | 04:05 PM
  #10  
asmith6's Avatar
asmith6
Mountain Pass
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 164
Likes: 1
From: Dripping Springs
IMHO, just cut the brake pedal rod shorter.

Set the pedal where you want it, measure that distance to the inside of the booster contact point to connection on the pedal.

Match the profile on the end of the rod and call it a day.

Just my 2 cents

Aaron
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2017 | 04:09 PM
  #11  
Singularity's Avatar
Singularity
Freshman User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 43
Likes: 4
SixtyFour -

Just to let you know: Your truck is not a '64. Its either a '65 or '66.

It may have been built in the 1964 calendar year but it's definitely a later model.

The inner fenders and steering column mount give it away.

Cheers
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2017 | 04:21 PM
  #12  
SixtyFour's Avatar
SixtyFour
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 199
Likes: 1
From: Berkeley, CA
Originally Posted by asmith6
IMHO, just cut the brake pedal rod shorter.

Set the pedal where you want it, measure that distance to the inside of the booster contact point to connection on the pedal.

Match the profile on the end of the rod and call it a day.

Just my 2 cents

Aaron
Not sure I'd want to do this - if the booster ever fails I'd have to make another custom booster rod again on the replacement. If I'm going to do something to the input rod I'd just rather install that tuff stuff booster with the adjustable rod.

Either way I'd have to take the current booster off and just replacing it doesn't take a bunch of fab work.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2017 | 04:24 PM
  #13  
SixtyFour's Avatar
SixtyFour
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 199
Likes: 1
From: Berkeley, CA
Originally Posted by Singularity
SixtyFour -

Just to let you know: Your truck is not a '64. Its either a '65 or '66.

It may have been built in the 1964 calendar year but it's definitely a later model.

The inner fenders and steering column mount give it away.

Cheers
Yeah? Honestly I have no idea - here's a couple more pics.

Name:  IMG_7933.JPG
Views: 2161
Size:  244.7 KB

Name:  IMG_7934.JPG
Views: 2138
Size:  324.8 KB
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2017 | 04:37 PM
  #14  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Singularity
SixtyFour -

Just to let you know: Your truck is not a '64. Its either a '65 or '66.

It may have been built in the 1964 calendar year but it's definitely a later model.

The inner fenders and steering column mount give it away.
This truck isn't close to being original, as it's a Frankenstein Monster with parts swapped from gawd only knows what.

The only way to verify the year is by the last 6 digits of the VIN

Truck has a 1965 grille, 1965/66 upper grille panel and suspended accelerator pedal.

Suspended accelerator pedal: 1965 F100/250 2WD from serial number 696,001; 1966 F100/250 2WD & 1966 F100 240/300 4WD

The front fender emblem was used on the sides of the hood in 1963/64. Only early 1965's used it as a front fender emblem.

The crossed flags front fender emblem is from a 1962/64 Galaxie.

The hood front emblem: 1961/64 all, 1965/66 I-6 only.
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2017 | 04:53 PM
  #15  
SixtyFour's Avatar
SixtyFour
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 199
Likes: 1
From: Berkeley, CA
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
This truck isn't close to being original, as it's a Frankenstein Monster with parts swapped from gawd only knows what.

The only way to verify the year is by the last 6 digits of the VIN

Truck has a 1965 grille, 1965/66 upper grille panel and suspended accelerator pedal.

Suspended accelerator pedal: 1965 F100/250 2WD from serial number 696,001; 1966 F100/250 2WD & 1966 F100 240/300 4WD

The front fender emblem was used on the sides of the hood in 1963/64. Only early 1965's used it as a front fender emblem.
Oh i know it's a frankenstein. It's actually a 2wd converted to 4wd. It's got a Dana 60 front axle out of a '79 Ford, a Chevy 14 bolt out back, a 390 out of a Tbird under the hood, and of course the '72 brake setup. Runs and drives great though

I'll look at the VIN later - but I could have sworn when i looked it up when i bought it it was was '64.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE