Notices
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Slick Sixties Ford Truck

Buyer Beware

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 5, 2017 | 09:45 AM
  #1  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
Buyer Beware

I'm glad that there are sources for NOS parts, but you really have to pay attention and know what you're supposed to be getting because they don't seem to have a clue. Both of my NOS wheel cylinders arrived yesterday from different vendors. Neither is correct.

One doesn't even look like an original Ford part (Wagner instead of Bendix or Kelsey Hayes) and no paint codes to identify which side and what diameter. All the other NOS wheel cylinders I've seen have 2 paint daubs to identify them (size and handedness). It was also missing one of the pistons, so it wasn't even useable.

Fortunately they gave me a refund without any hassle. The other one was a genuine NOS Ford part with the expected paint code marks, but it was an "acceptable substitute" or "interchanges with" part (C4UZ instead of C5TZ). It would bolt in place, has the correct handedness, the hose would screw right in and the pistons are the correct diameter. However, if all I wanted was a suitable substitute I could get that from Rock Auto and save some money. I'm willing to pay for NOS parts because they're supposed to be the EXACT part that it would have come from factory.

I have a couple of options: I could hone out the original cylinders or drill and tap a pair of NOS Mustang wheel cylinders to use the truck brake hose. For now I think I'll just leave it alone and go with the aftermarket wheel cylinders already installed. Bummer.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2017 | 09:53 AM
  #2  
Boss9F100's Avatar
Boss9F100
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,670
Likes: 370
From: PHX AZ
Originally Posted by 66v8baby
I'm glad that there are sources for NOS parts, but you really have to pay attention and know what you're supposed to be getting because they don't seem to have a clue. Both of my NOS wheel cylinders arrived yesterday from different vendors. Neither is correct.

One doesn't even look like an original Ford part (Wagner instead of Bendix or Kelsey Hayes) and no paint codes to identify which side and what diameter. All the other NOS wheel cylinders I've seen have 2 paint daubs to identify them (size and handedness). It was also missing one of the pistons, so it wasn't even useable.

Fortunately they gave me a refund without any hassle. The other one was a genuine NOS Ford part with the expected paint code marks, but it was an "acceptable substitute" or "interchanges with" part (C4UZ instead of C5TZ). It would bolt in place, has the correct handedness, the hose would screw right in and the pistons are the correct diameter. However, if all I wanted was a suitable substitute I could get that from Rock Auto and save some money. I'm willing to pay for NOS parts because they're supposed to be the EXACT part that it would have come from factory.

I have a couple of options: I could hone out the original cylinders or drill and tap a pair of NOS Mustang wheel cylinders to use the truck brake hose. For now I think I'll just leave it alone and go with the aftermarket wheel cylinders already installed. Bummer.
I know what you are saying. I have purchased many of supposed NOS parts. One of the biggest was a '66 F-100 Brake Booster. I paid Big $$ for it only to find inside the box was the "core".

Pretty sure I have the NOS wheel cylinders for a F-100. Front or rear? Have shocks and a bunch of other stuff I have been hoarding. Planned on doing a 100% correct truck but time and age are getting the better of me.

I have NOS Brake shoes too. I spent 1/2 a fortune on NOS 1966 F-100 Parts.. One was a front bumper still in a wrapper and wooden shipping box. Paid really big $$ for it about 17 yrs ago now & still have it. Went to pull it out of package around 6 months ago only to find its a C4tZ bumper but 67-72 replacement. Paid well over 500 for it too. Now I cannot get the price for a junk aftermarket for it and its still in the wrapper. Same guy I bought the NOS booster from and also a NOS A/C compressor. Compressor cap where fittings are was broken. I found out later he would purchase NOS parts then put a used or broken item back in box, slip it back on ebay and play dumb after the fact. I had well over 1000.00 wrapped up in the parts with ZERO refund.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2017 | 11:15 AM
  #3  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
Sorry to hear your story Boss9! My dad has always told me "stop feelin' sorry for yourself, there's always someone who has it worse than you". And that would be you right now Boss9.

I'm not looking for '66 F100 front wheel cylinders, I was trying to go up a size to 1 1/8" The C5TZ 2061/62 parts would have the larger bore size and also have the small 1/4" bleed valve like my originals. I have new reproduction rears with the 1/4" bleed screw and I wanted to make them all the same.

I often consider the lessons I learn from buying unusable junk on ebay just the price of a higher education. I do hate taking the same class over and over again though.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2017 | 02:47 PM
  #4  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 66v8baby
I'm glad that there are sources for NOS parts, but you really have to pay attention and know what you're supposed to be getting because they don't seem to have a clue. Both of my NOS wheel cylinders arrived yesterday from different vendors. Neither is correct.

One doesn't even look like an original Ford part (Wagner instead of Bendix or Kelsey Hayes) and no paint codes to identify which side and what diameter. All the other NOS wheel cylinders I've seen have 2 paint daubs to identify them (size and handedness). It was also missing one of the pistons, so it wasn't even useable.

Fortunately they gave me a refund without any hassle.

The other one was a genuine NOS Ford part with the expected paint code marks, but it was an "acceptable substitute" or "interchanges with" part (C4UZ instead of C5TZ).
There are two different C5TZ wheel cylinders.
C5TZ-2061-C (replaced C4UZ-2061-A) Right & (EDIT) C5TZ-2062-C (replaced C4UZ-2062-A) Left .. Front Wheel Cylinders - 1 1/8" diameter / Obsolete

1964/67 E100 with 10" x 2 1/2" brakes; 1968/71 F100 with 11" x 3" brakes.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1965/67 F100 2WD use different wheel cylinders:

C5TZ-2061-A Right & C3OZ-2062-C Left .. Front Wheel Cylinders - 1 1/16" diameter / Obsolete

C5TZ-2061-A = 1965 F100 4WD & 1965/67 F100 2WD w/11" x 2" brakes.

C3OZ-2062-C = 1965 F100 4WD w/11" x 2" brakes; 1965/67 F100 2WD w/11" x 2" brakes; 1963/65 Fairlane with 10" x 2 1/2" brakes.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2017 | 03:46 PM
  #5  
charliemccraney's Avatar
charliemccraney
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 58
NOS does not mean that they are the parts installed at the factory. It is new old stock, literally a new part from old stock. That means it is possible that it is the same part that was installed at the factory, but it can also be a genuine replacement that was made available, say in the '80s, which may or may not be identical to the original.

In the case of using the original part number when it is clearly a replacement part number, that is dishonest and should not have happened.

However, a genuine replacement part is probably better than the Chinese part you would get brand new from everywhere now.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2017 | 05:02 PM
  #6  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
NOS = New Old Stock genuine OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer: Ford/GM/Chrysler etc.) obsolete parts.

NORS = New Old Replacement Stock obsolete parts...sold by auto parts stores.

Obsolete parts: From 1966 thru 1985, I bought out over 300 west coast FoMoCo dealers, former Studebaker and/or Packard dealers, 2 Chevy dealers and a former Desoto/Dodge dealer.

The best money makers: Former Packard dealer in Watsonville and a L/M dealer in Yuba City.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2017 | 09:35 AM
  #7  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
Yes there are 2 different part numbers and I think you meant C5TZ 2062-C for the RH side. I was specifically trying to go up to the 1 1/8" bore size while keeping the original appearance with the 1/4" (wrench) bleed valve.


One vendor sent me what was supposed to be an AD 2061-A part in a red and white box, but what was in the box was obviously aftermarket, not an OEM Ford part at all.


The other vendor sent me the C4UZ interchange part that's basically what I already have installed (larger 3/8 wrench size bleed valve). It was at least a genuine Ford sourced replacement part.


I'm also aware that NOS doesn't always mean assembly line correct, but it does have to at least be an original Ford sourced replacement part to qualify, and when I specify a part number, I'm really looking for THAT part number, not what interchanges with it.


Originally Posted by NumberDummy
C5TZ-2061-C (replaced C4UZ-2061-A) Right & C5TZ-2061-C (replaced C4UZ-2062-A) Left .. Front Wheel Cylinders - 1 1/8" diameter / Obsolete

1964/67 E100 with 10" x 2 1/2" brakes; 1968/72 F100 with 11" x 3" brakes.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1965/67 F100 2WD use different wheel cylinders:

C5TZ-2061-A Right & C3OZ-2062-C Left .. Front Wheel Cylinders - 1 1/16" diameter / Obsolete

C5TZ-2061-A = 1965 F100 4WD & 1965/67 F100 2WD w/11" x 2" brakes.

C3OZ-2062-C = 1965 F100 4WD w/11" x 2" brakes; 1965/67 F100 2WD w/11" x 2" brakes; 1963/65 Fairlane with 10" x 2 1/2" brakes.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2017 | 10:40 AM
  #8  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 66v8baby
Yes there are 2 different part numbers and I think you meant C5TZ 2062-C for the RH side.
No, I did not.
C3OZ-2062-C .. 1 1/16" is what the 1964/72 Ford Truck Parts Catalog lists for the left front wheel cylinder for: 1965 F100 4WD & 1965/66 F100 2WD with 11" x 2" brakes.

The right side is C5TZ-2061-A

See EDIT in post 4: C5TZ-2062-C (replaced C4UZ-2062-A) .. Left Front Wheel Cylinder - 1 1/8" diameter = 1964/67 E100 with 10" x 2 1/2" brakes; 1968/71 F100 with 11" x 3" brakes.

This parts catalog is available on a C/D from hipoparts.com
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 8, 2017 | 11:21 AM
  #9  
66v8baby's Avatar
66v8baby
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 70
From: Southern Maryland
I didn't see your edit in post 4. I have the parts catalog, that's how I found the part numbers for the 68-71 HD 3" front brake wheel cylinders. I've also swapped the backing plates and installed new 3" front shoes (ceramic matrix) and drums.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2017 | 11:51 AM
  #10  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 66v8baby
I didn't see your edit in post 4. I have the parts catalog, that's how I found the part numbers for the 68-71 HD 3" front brake wheel cylinders. I've also swapped the backing plates and installed new 3" front shoes (ceramic matrix) and drums.
EDIT: Typed several minutes ago when I realized I had typo'd C5TZ-2061-C for the 1 1/8" diameter left side instead of C5TZ-2062-C

C5TZ-2061-C is the right side.

C5TZ-2061-A; C3OZ-2062-C; C5TZ-2061-C/C5TZ-2062-C listed here: Text Section 20.1, Parts List #2 .. page 8.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jimcar-9
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Aug 21, 2014 02:18 PM
mechanic58
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
16
Jan 2, 2014 10:09 PM
Wolfracing
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
Sep 27, 2013 03:58 PM
Broken Crank
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
May 8, 2011 02:14 PM
saskpwr
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
Apr 7, 2010 09:11 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE