When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As long they aren't total crap, off brand, schit, WTF are you selling me rubbers.
They have different levels of confiidance, and protection.
Spend a few more bucks, and don't worry.
But if you gotta buy the "Jupiter, Pluto, Starfire, Klaxon Radial XC798" tires, you may as well splurge and get them in an E load rating, then inflate them to sidewall max...
I got my truck with D rated tires on it. At the first chance I upgraded to E rated. It's not just the tire capacity to think about, it's how much weight you put on it AND the road conditions you'll be driving on. For the extra $40-$100 the peace of mind I get with E rated tires make the expense worth it.
If I bump up to the 285/75/16, most tires are E rated. I have 285 BFG's right now.
It's not the price points, it's the looks. I am looking at 3 right now:
Cooper Discoverer AT/3 - Does anybody know if they say OWL - is the inside a blackwall, and I can use the blackwall side...or are both sides white lettered?
Falken Wildpeak AT3 - Strongly leaning towards this tire, but I'm not familiar with the brand.
Kumho Road Venture AT51 - Not familiar with this tire on a truck. I had them on my Mercedes and they were good tires. But, they look the most aggressive of the 3, not sure if I like that.
Personally, I don't like all the crap on the sides of the tires, especially the extra tread along the edges loke the new BFG's have. The Coopers would be perfect if they weren't etched with all street tire looking crap.
I don't need an AT as I don't do any offroading - but I like the looks of an AT tire. Not mud or snow. The old BFG's were perfect.
Sorry, but looks to me are completely secondary to safety. I know 90% of tires out there only have lettering on one side (you can run them blackwall). But if the tires I feel are safe happen to have tread up the side, so be it. I don't want to be "that guy" that had a blowout and died because I wanted to have my tires look "just so" instead of running tires that were safe.
Sorry, but looks to me are completely secondary to safety. I know 90% of tires out there only have lettering on one side (you can run them blackwall). But if the tires I feel are safe happen to have tread up the side, so be it. I don't want to be "that guy" that had a blowout and died because I wanted to have my tires look "just so" instead of running tires that were safe.
Just my opinion.
Thanks. What tires are you running? I can go back to a highway tire, I am considering that, too.
And yes, looks will be important on a street tire too --but I don't plan on putting anything unsafe on my truck, period.
I simply hate all the tribal looking garb on the sidewalls.
Cooper Discoverer AT/3 - Does anybody know if they say OWL - is the inside a blackwall, and I can use the blackwall side...or are both sides white lettered?
I just put a set of these on my dads truck last week, he likes blackwall so that's the way we did it. I prefer the white lettering but it's not my truck so...black they went. I know a lot of people who like this tire and I'm a Cooper fan so i'm hoping they are as good as hoped.
On the load rating side, D would be fine E would be better.
I'm over here running C rated for both my summer and winter set since 2010...I should be dead by now from what everyone says but I'm not
For a mostly highway tread. I really liked the Uniroyal Laredo. Not sure if you can find them anymore but I went through a set on the Excursion and three sets on an Explorer we had. They had some long lasting tread as well and I only replaced them due to age and the small lift my springs gave were begging for a more aggressive tread.
Falken Wildpeak AT3 - Strongly leaning towards this tire, but I'm not familiar with the brand.
.
What I know about them,
Falken is a niche brand owned by the Sumitomo rubber group of Japan, they are one of the worlds top rubber and tire manufactures owning more well know brands like Dunlop.
Truck tire wise I have only been on one trail ride in them but know they have had some success with my friends Naozumi, Gerald, And Jessi racing for them.
Naozumi on course out in Johnson Valley Ca at King of the Hammers race.
Isn't that kinda like saying Pirelli's are a good tyre because they run in F1?
I know zero about the Falken's and the Kuhmo's. My brother has had a couple sets of the Cooper's and he was happy with them. I had a set of Michelin MS2's and was happy with them on pavement, they were fair to poor off. I think if you stick with a brand name tire and avoid the china bombs, you'll be happy enough with whatever you get.
Isn't that kinda like saying Pirelli's are a good tyre because they run in F1?
t.
In some cases yes, a few of the tire companies build us race specific tires but Falken runs their D.O.T. street tires, the same ones available to anybody retail.
Falken is a niche brand owned by the Sumitomo rubber group of Japan, they are one of the worlds top rubber and tire manufactures owning more well know brands like Dunlop.
Truck tire wise I have only been on one trail ride in them but know they have had some success with my friends Naozumi, Gerald, And Jessi racing for them.
Naozumi on course out in Johnson Valley Ca at King of the Hammers race.
Thanks pirate for all your input; I've read a lot of your posts and know you are well-informed about a variety of topics.
Riverside here, so I'm a little familiar with KOH.
Originally Posted by AlaskanEx
I just put a set of these on my dads truck last week, he likes blackwall so that's the way we did it. I prefer the white lettering but it's not my truck so...black they went. I know a lot of people who like this tire and I'm a Cooper fan so i'm hoping they are as good as hoped.
On the load rating side, D would be fine E would be better.
I'm over here running C rated for both my summer and winter set since 2010...I should be dead by now from what everyone says but I'm not
Before my BFG's, I had the Yoko Geolander AT's. They were an E rated tire, but I had a rear blowout on the toll roads here...stuck in traffic lanes...scared the crap outta me.
I guess I should have rephrased ny question from the start, I was simply confused about the load ratings, i.e. "E" vs 114 etc. Now I understand it better.
Thanks
Originally Posted by 05MilMachine
For a mostly highway tread. I really liked the Uniroyal Laredo. Not sure if you can find them anymore but I went through a set on the Excursion and three sets on an Explorer we had. They had some long lasting tread as well and I only replaced them due to age and the small lift my springs gave were begging for a more aggressive tread.
I am abandoning the AT look, I would benefit more from a highway tire. Thanks for your input.
Originally Posted by ExxWhy
Isn't that kinda like saying Pirelli's are a good tyre because they run in F1?
I know zero about the Falken's and the Kuhmo's. My brother has had a couple sets of the Cooper's and he was happy with them. I had a set of Michelin MS2's and was happy with them on pavement, they were fair to poor off. I think if you stick with a brand name tire and avoid the china bombs, you'll be happy enough with whatever you get.
Thanks for your thoughts on the Cooper's. After my Yoko experience, I'm a bit scared to trust the Kuhmo's, and will probably stick with traditional brands.
I recently had a right rear blow while doing 80 in the fast lane, BFG ko2 Not the tires fault, I picked up a bolt in the road and it exploded. It happens
Robert, those look great, thanks for taking the time to share.
I was trolling tires last night and came across Uniroyal Laredo's at Sears for $50 off. I like the fact they are a 60K tire, and yes, E rated. Sears also had a 25% installation discount off the entire purchase, and two other coupons...I got four tires installed/balanced, out the door with tax for $630. With all the discounts, I saved $280.
The Cooper AT3's from Discount Direct's eBay store were second in line --but I couldn't pass up the Sears discounts.
60K miles will probably be the last set I buy as I am only driving about 5-6K miles per year.
Should be noted that because of the volume a 37" @ 35 psi will support 2755 lbs each or 5510 total, right at the rear axles GAWR of 5250
Yup, I run my 37" at correct psi of 35 psi
My Mickey Thompson 37's only behaved well at a higher PSI. When I tried the same PSI with the Toyo 37's I subsequently put on, my truck was squirrelly as hell. I found the best handling PSI for my Toyo's is right around 42.
That being said, there could be something not quite in spec with my front axle/suspension, so the extra PSI could be offsetting that.
Originally Posted by AlaskanEx
On the load rating side, D would be fine E would be better.
When I had to start buying larger than stock tires for my truck, I quickly learned the 37's didn't come in an E rated tired, but the D rated tire certainly had the specs. After doing some research I learned the alpha designations are far from industry standard with the same ratings from company to company. I'm not even sure why it's still used since it isn't standardized.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.