Notices

428 Advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 17, 2016 | 05:57 PM
  #16  
1972RedNeck's Avatar
1972RedNeck
Logistics Pro
10 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,522
Likes: 11
From: Townsend, MT
Originally Posted by '65Ford
Curious if you got one of the "newer" 406's with the cross bolted mains.

Since it now has 900ish miles, might want to run through the rocker arms and check lash...if it is a 406 which has the mechanical lifters. If you verify they're actually hydraulic then forget what I said.
The OP said it was a 428 block. Therefore the block should be drilled for hydraulic lifters.
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2016 | 06:34 PM
  #17  
Destroked 450's Avatar
Destroked 450
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 322
From: Harned, Ky
Originally Posted by hiball3985
the valve covers aren't 406 and won't work on a 406...

True they're not 406 valve covers but why won't they work on a 406.
 
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2016 | 08:36 PM
  #18  
'65Ford's Avatar
'65Ford
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 372
Originally Posted by 1972RedNeck
The OP said it was a 428 block. Therefore the block should be drilled for hydraulic lifters.
Tend to agree that it's any FE besides a 406. I only mention checking the lifters because I'd want to verify whether or not it was hydraulic since the uncle for some reason said it was a 406.
 
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2016 | 08:32 AM
  #19  
Destroked 450's Avatar
Destroked 450
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 322
From: Harned, Ky
Using the 428's bore (4.125) and 390's stroke (3.780) will get you a 406 ci engine like the one I have and you can put a solid lifter cam in it, but it won't be a solid lifter only or possible cross bolt main block like the original 406, it will have the updated three bolt motor mount pads and bolt on cam retainer that the 406 didn't have.


The part I question is using a 428 block (4.125 bore) and reusing the 352's shorter stroke (3.500) will give one a 372 ci engine that would only have 7-8:1 compression using a factory type 406 piston because the piston would be around .100 down in the hole.
I may be wrong but I don't see one spending large amounts of $$ on custom pistons or rods for that combination for only a 20 ci gain, when a crank swap will gain more displacement for less $$.
 
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2016 | 10:25 AM
  #20  
hiball3985's Avatar
hiball3985
Logistics Pro
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,771
Likes: 80
From: tujunga, calif
Originally Posted by Destroked 450
True they're not 406 valve covers but why won't they work on a 406.
The pentroof type valve covers don't have enough clearance for adjustable rockers used with a solid lifter cam. Been there done that. My 390 has a factory 427 cam and valve train.
 
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2016 | 02:13 PM
  #21  
Destroked 450's Avatar
Destroked 450
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 322
From: Harned, Ky
Originally Posted by hiball3985
The pentroof type valve covers don't have enough clearance for adjustable rockers used with a solid lifter cam. Been there done that. My 390 has a factory 427 cam and valve train.

Those are most definitely not pentroof valve covers, pentroofs came on 427's that had adjustable rockers and are about two inches taller then the ones shown. I have a set of pentroofs on my 406 with aluminum roller rockers.
Looking at the pic they appear to be 65-67 flat top valve covers, I had a set of chrome ones on a 67 428 engine in a 73 F-100, I've never tried using adjustable rockers with that type of valve cover so thanks for the info.
I have ran adjustable rockers under the 68 and later Powered by Ford valve covers with a moderate lift (under .550) street cam.
 
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2016 | 03:01 PM
  #22  
hiball3985's Avatar
hiball3985
Logistics Pro
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,771
Likes: 80
From: tujunga, calif
Originally Posted by Destroked 450
Those are most definitely not pentroof valve covers, pentroofs came on 427's that had adjustable rockers and are about two inches taller then the ones shown. I have a set of pentroofs on my 406 with aluminum roller rockers.
Looking at the pic they appear to be 65-67 flat top valve covers, I had a set of chrome ones on a 67 428 engine in a 73 F-100, I've never tried using adjustable rockers with that type of valve cover so thanks for the info.
I have ran adjustable rockers under the 68 and later Powered by Ford valve covers with a moderate lift (under .550) street cam.
I shouldn't have called them pentroof, my mistake, I was just referring to the stock 65-67 covers.
Back in my circle track days we used 427's with 352 crank, rods and custom Jahns made pistons.. We had a 400 cu in limit.
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2016 | 12:00 AM
  #23  
firsttofight11b's Avatar
firsttofight11b
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 14
Likes: 0







Picked up the truck today. She runs great and sounds great too. My grandpa put duals under it and cut them by the rear axle. He kept the stock manifolds though. So I see some headers in my future. He also removed the gas tank from behind the seat and mounted an exterior tank. Looks nice and a lot safer. Took some pics real quick before I had to run off to work. My uncle told me the engine was built by a local guy and he thinks it actually has a 427 crank in it as well. I guess it wad thr first 406 he built because you can see the 406-1 stamped in the engine in one of the photos. I will have to try and track the guy down. I included some pics of some stuff my grandpa had taped inside the shop manual. Thought you guys might be able to help decifer it.

I can't believe how good of shape it is in. I think I will start by putting a windshield fluid resevoir in it and switching the front brakes to disc brakes to make it a little safer. Maybe put some headers on it, change the air filter to dry, rewire the headlights and put some speakers in it. Anything else I'm missing?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 24, 2016 | 08:28 AM
  #24  
hiball3985's Avatar
hiball3985
Logistics Pro
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,771
Likes: 80
From: tujunga, calif
The one paper with info says "427 point dwell 35". 406-427 distributors were dual points and no vacuum advance typically like the one in your photo. Not sure what distributor the later hydraulic motor used.
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2016 | 10:47 AM
  #25  
69cj's Avatar
69cj
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 13,834
Likes: 25
From: Middle Tn.
My 428 has the vertically mounted oil filter. Not the horizontal one shown.
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2016 | 11:34 AM
  #26  
Destroked 450's Avatar
Destroked 450
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 322
From: Harned, Ky
428 block with a 427 crank would give 406 ci, that's the same thing I have.

The torque spec paper shows rod bolt torque of 53-58lbs making me thing he installed a set of early 406-427-428CJ rods that are a little beefier with larger 13/32 bolts.
Not sure why the 427 point dwell unless he was just copying down all the 406-427 info which would bring the rod bolt torque into question, it's nothing to be concerned about unless one tore the engine down again.

Comp Cams 268 High Energy is their version of the 428CJ cam and is a real nice daily driver cam with good performance up to around 5500 rpm.

Looks like you've inherited a nice truck with a good strong engine.
Congrats!
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2016 | 11:40 AM
  #27  
Destroked 450's Avatar
Destroked 450
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 322
From: Harned, Ky
Originally Posted by 69cj
My 428 has the vertically mounted oil filter. Not the horizontal one shown.

Pickups used horizontal mounted filters to clear the cross member, my 73 F-100 had a 428CJ in it with the vertical car filter base, I barely could get the short Chrysler style filer screwed on.
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2016 | 12:09 PM
  #28  
Beechkid's Avatar
Beechkid
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,099
Likes: 379
From: Southern California
Club FTE Gold Member
That is a great gift!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2016 | 12:52 PM
  #29  
Destroked 450's Avatar
Destroked 450
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 322
From: Harned, Ky
Originally Posted by firsttofight11b








I think I will start by putting a windshield fluid resevoir in it and switching the front brakes to disc brakes to make it a little safer. Maybe put some headers on it, change the air filter to dry, rewire the headlights and put some speakers in it. Anything else I'm missing?

Change it over to a dual master cylinder brake system, with the single master cylinder system if it has one little leak you'll have NO BRAKES. (Been there, said it louder with extra words in between.)
Sanderson makes some nice shorty headers for these trucks, I'd go with the ceramic coated, their a little pricy but will last a lot longer.
I'm guessing there's a issue with the headlights for the rewire.

Two things missing.
Enjoying your truck and stopping by the cemetery to thank your grandpa.
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2016 | 05:31 PM
  #30  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,475
Likes: 2,800
Club FTE Gold Member
3rd and 4th picture shows reverse "105" on the block. FWIW.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE