Notices
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

Re-use Head Bolts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 8, 2016 | 03:36 PM
  #16  
matthewq4b's Avatar
matthewq4b
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,831
Likes: 121
From: St Albert, Alberta
Originally Posted by kr98664
Good info, thanks for the reply. Does this still apply if completely dry, or is it only an issue if the bolt was installed while still wet with brake cleaner?
Since this works on the molecular level wet or dry it applies. After X amount of time it will react with the surrounding free oxygen and neutralize, (Don't ask me how long I have no idea too many variables). Same as how your's pools Chlorine level drops over time as it reacts with the free oxygen in the air and the water, same process. The problem is if there is pitting or micro pitting it may take much longer than a person would suspect (like days).

So washing your head bolts off with brake clean drying them off and stuffing them back in the hole should be avoided. Also what is the first thing most of us do after cleaning metal bits ? Hose it down with a rust inhibitor to prevent corrosion, thus sealing it from the oxidizing effects of the oxygen in the atmosphere.

Like I said it is just a good practice. 99.9% of the time it would present no issues. But you know how Murphy's law works.....
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2016 | 02:43 PM
  #17  
rbond's Avatar
rbond
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 217
Likes: 2
From: the Mtns of Santa Cruz
Originally Posted by matthewq4b
They are not torque to yield bolts.

You can usually tell if bolts are torque to yield by the torquing method.
Torque to yield bolt are generally torqued to a certain value then tightened X numbers of degrees. Torque to yield bolts are torqued to elasticity then tightened by x number of degrees in to plastic deformation. This permanently deforms the bolt by lengthening it as it has been stretched past elasticity. They are one time use fasteners.

Sometimes they can be identified by having a section on the body thinner than the locating shoulder and the threads. This thinner area is the part that will stretch to plastic deformation.

If you feel the need the replace then get them from a reputable supplier, ARP for example, avoid getting ones of questionable Chinese manufacture where you'd probably be better off re-using the originals.

I have never had a Ford head bolt fail in reuse, it is a rare occurrence for this to happen.
Just inspect them and clean them up. If any show any signs of corrosion in the threads (pitting) replace it. Also avoid using chlorinated brake clean to clean them up.
Thx Matthew... good info all the way around. My "F" bolts DO have a slightly narrower shaft section like you describe... and I've seen bolts with a very distinct narrow mid-section... I assume you mean those when talking about TTY.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2016 | 06:30 PM
  #18  
matthewq4b's Avatar
matthewq4b
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,831
Likes: 121
From: St Albert, Alberta
Originally Posted by rbond
Thx Matthew... good info all the way around. My "F" bolts DO have a slightly narrower shaft section like you describe... and I've seen bolts with a very distinct narrow mid-section... I assume you mean those when talking about TTY.
Originally Posted by rbond
Thx Matthew... good info all the way around. My "F" bolts DO have a slightly narrower shaft section like you describe... and I've seen bolts with a very distinct narrow mid-section... I assume you mean those when talking about TTY.

Yours are not narrower in the mid section it only looks that way. The top bit is to locate bolt in the cylinder head. And on the bottom since the threads were rolled it raises them up past the body of the bolt. If they were cut and not rolled they would be flush or narrower (Smaller Diam) than the body of the bolt.

And the bolts you seen with a much narrower shaft were likely torque to yield, so one time use.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2016 | 06:33 PM
  #19  
rbond's Avatar
rbond
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 217
Likes: 2
From: the Mtns of Santa Cruz
Originally Posted by matthewq4b
Yours are not narrower in the mid section it only looks that way. The top bit is to locate bolt in the cylinder head. And on the bottom since the threads were rolled it raises them up past the body of the bolt. If they were cut and not rolled they would be flush or narrower (Smaller Diam) than the body of the bolt.

And the bolts you seen with a much narrower shaft were likely torque to yield, so one time use.
... got it... thx for the clarification
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2020 | 02:14 PM
  #20  
LindenBruce's Avatar
LindenBruce
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 972
Likes: 224
From: Linden, Ca.
So, are the Ford head gaskets still the go to units? Or Fel-Pro? It appears as though having the heads ringed is still a good option? B.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2020 | 03:24 PM
  #21  
matthewq4b's Avatar
matthewq4b
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,831
Likes: 121
From: St Albert, Alberta
Originally Posted by LindenBruce
So, are the Ford head gaskets still the go to units? Or Fel-Pro? It appears as though having the heads ringed is still a good option? B.
No need for ringing unless you are running boost or NOS, as for best head gaskets probably Cometic's MLS again though not really needed unless you are running boost or NOS.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2020 | 09:25 PM
  #22  
LindenBruce's Avatar
LindenBruce
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 972
Likes: 224
From: Linden, Ca.
So, are ringed heads the way to go? And Ford head gaskets are still the go to right? How about the Fel-Pros? B
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ihf-350
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
7
Jun 2, 2015 05:58 PM
MONAVIERONJON
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
11
Sep 2, 2012 12:08 PM
tiap
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
3
Aug 3, 2007 10:10 AM
53fatfndr
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
4
Jun 22, 2005 01:52 AM
springer9861
2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 4.0 & SOHC 4.0 V6
6
Jun 11, 2003 06:54 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE