DONE😡😡😡😡
Gman
I don't understand why this particular filtration system is ineffective for 'bad fuel'. That's its only job to do.
Given this, I would think there would be an aftermarket filtration system available and popular, to prevent a $10,000 bill. Even if it was a few grand. Don't see any post here about them.
Only thing you can do is to try to mitigate the issue as best you can. I have drained daily sometimes just to be sure.
The assumption of many is that Ford could build a zero defect truck, but because they are stupid, or cheap, or careless, they don't. And that because the truck costs a lot of money, they should. But here in the real world, NASA can't build zero defect multi-billion dollar satellites (nor can private industry, as we have just found out), even one-off - let alone by the million for a relative pittance.
Water can be dissolved, emulsified, or just be present as water in diesel fuel. The filtration that is available for a pickup truck does nothing at all for the dissolved water, can get much (but not all) of the emulsified water, and should be able to get all of the ordinary water (as long as there is a place to put it). You can read all this in Racor's or Baldwin's literature or the many research studies on the subject.
Diesel Site's filter has the same type and efficiency filters that Ford uses. You are just adding capacity to store trapped water (which is a good thing), in transparent bowls so you can see it (another good thing), incrementally improving the system. But call them and ask if they will warrantee your fuel system against water if you buy one and put bad fuel through it. I already know the answer. Their warrantee is the same as Ford's.
On these new trucks (not just the Ford), contaminated fuel is like the weather - everybody complains about it but nobody does anything.
I would be much more critical of Ford if they could have bought a better filter for another $20 but didn't. That does not seem to be the case. If you know of such a filter please point it out to them and me. We would all be using it.
I am MUCH more critical of them on the 2011 valve issue - here is a known cause with a known fix and culpability - there should have been a recall or extended warrantee.
Not "buthurt" at all. To summarize, I agreed with the OP that I would be upset if something unfortunate happened. Especially IF it was due to inadequate stock filtration. But to say that I'd never buy a Ford diesel again as Grodyman posted, because of one story on the internet, is absolutely asinine in my opinion... or "buthurt" as you so eloquently put it. Good grief, I hope that clears it up for you...
Anyways, I'm still surprised that even if water is emulsified and makes it into the fuel system, that rust (which is the only thing the dealer found) can make it past the filter media. As I said though, I guess I'm learning something new here.
I also burn approx. 500 gallons of fuel each month, so a lot of fuel passes through my system and I've never had any reason to worry about any of it. I change my filters at 15,000 miles and they usually look clean.
I use an aux tank in the bed and it has a clear in line filter, I look at it all the time so there is some opportunity there for me to spot a contamination issue. I do think it would be wise for ford to use a clear bowl somewhere so that the fuel is visible. Probably would knock down most of the dirty fuel problems that come as a complete surprise to folks.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Depending on how much rust is in the system it could have started before this fill up.
You add an emulsifier and it breaks the water down into small particles and holds it in suspension within the fuel.
This fuel then passes through the filters WITH the water. Then, on the other side of the filter, water contaminates the works. And rust forms.
The rust particles didn't pass through the filter. They are a product of the water that passed through.
I did a quick google on Lucas and find several places where it's stated that Lucas is an emulsifier but I cannot find this in a Lucas link.
Not trying to blame you or stand up for Ford, just thinking this through in my own mind.
bruce...
You add an emulsifier and it breaks the water down into small particles and holds it in suspension within the fuel.
This fuel then passes through the filters WITH the water. Then on the other side of the filter water contaminates the works. And rust forms.
The rust particles didn't pass through the filter. They are a product of the water that passed through.
So, it wasn't just one bad fill up then? If it was, there certainly wouldn't be time for rust to form. Thanks for explaining it. Makes sense now.
You add an emulsifier and it breaks the water down into small particles and holds it in suspension within the fuel.
This fuel then passes through the filters WITH the water. Then on the other side of the filter water contaminates the works. And rust forms.
The rust particles didn't pass through the filter. They are a product of the water that passed through.
It is a cumulative process!
And pretty much ALL modern diesels are high pressure common rail systems, and none are immune to this problem!
This is any 2007+ vehicle and a handful of vehicles before that year as well.
I've had Duramax guys call begging for a system, Cummins guys, BMWs, Mercedes, etc. It sucks, but even my Volkswagen will potentially have this issue one day. Even worse is that we can't use our particular system design on any vehicle that has the pump in the tank - like my Volkswagen.

We realized the importance of the system when our own 2011 had a failure and Ford denied the warranty. I don't think our light ever even came on until the very end when the truck wouldn't run anymore. I'm not sure if it's the poop quality of the fuel or the true inability of current technologies on the vehicles or a mixture of both. All I know is that it blows and I'm not looking forward to fixing it on my car when it does happen.
Blah.









