Notices
2015 - 2020 F150 Discuss the 2015 - 2020 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Window sticker prices

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 12, 2016 | 01:36 PM
  #1  
cdmm151's Avatar
cdmm151
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Window sticker prices

Ok, I'm confused about sticker prices.

Examples,

Ford F150 502A packages range $6995 to $7795

Ecoboost ranges $400-$1400

This makes no sense.
 
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2016 | 01:51 PM
  #2  
Schlotzky's Avatar
Schlotzky
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
The price differences are due to different standard equipment. It's 6,995 on a SCREW 6.5 bed and 7,795 for a SCREW 5.5 or a SCAB 6.5. The $800 price difference is the automatic inclusion of the 5.0 V8 (an $800 option) on the SCREW 6.5, where the other configurations have the 2.7 EB as the base engine. Same thing for the 3.5 EB upgrade cost; you're starting from a different point on the tree, so the jump is different.

Those prices are fluid as far as the actual effect on the price of the truck anyway, so they aren't really meaningful in any real way anyway. For instance, the FX4 package is listed as $770 on my window sticker, but to configure my truck the same less FX4, the price only drops $330, because I already have the 3.73 e-locker separately. Same thing for 502a; it didn't really add $6,995 to my sticker price because of my other choices on the truck.
 
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2016 | 01:58 PM
  #3  
Wiggums's Avatar
Wiggums
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 32
That's because there are 4 engines.. 3.5 V6, 2.7 EB, 5.0 V8, and 3.5 EB.

The 3.5 EB is the top of the line engine and the 3.5 V6 is the cheapest. The 3.5 V6 is standard, the 2.7 EB cost a bit more, the 5.0 V8 costs more than the 2.7 EB, and the 3.5 EB is the most expensive of all.

Some configurations, the 2.7 EB is the standard so the 5.0 V8 and 3.5 EB are cheaper since it's a smaller jump from the 2.7 EB compared to the basic 3.5 V6.

The long bed has the 5.0 V8 standard, no 3.5 V6 or 2.7 EB. The 3.5 EB costs a little more than the 5.0 V8 and the price reflects that because it's not going four steps up from the cheapest V6.
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2016 | 04:59 AM
  #4  
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
Community Builder
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 39,847
Likes: 1,502
From: Maine, Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Don't get all bogged down with individual prices, it'll make your head spin. Find a truck you love and work on the bottom line / OTD. Out the door price.
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2016 | 07:28 AM
  #5  
cdmm151's Avatar
cdmm151
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
I'm not really. Truck is on the dealers location and is to be moved today. Only thing is I have to drive 200 miles to get it. I have been dealing with Covert in Hutto Tx for years and still go the extra mile. Gives me a chance to see my oldest.
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2016 | 05:33 PM
  #6  
user 474747383's Avatar
user 474747383
Laughing Gas
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 177

Originally Posted by Wiggums
That's because there are 4 engines.. 3.5 V6, 2.7 EB, 5.0 V8, and 3.5 EB.

The 3.5 EB is the top of the line engine and the 3.5 V6 is the cheapest. The 3.5 V6 is standard, the 2.7 EB cost a bit more, the 5.0 V8 costs more than the 2.7 EB, and the 3.5 EB is the most expensive of all.

Some configurations, the 2.7 EB is the standard so the 5.0 V8 and 3.5 EB are cheaper since it's a smaller jump from the 2.7 EB compared to the basic 3.5 V6.

The long bed has the 5.0 V8 standard, no 3.5 V6 or 2.7 EB. The 3.5 EB costs a little more than the 5.0 V8 and the price reflects that because it's not going four steps up from the cheapest V6.
My 2016 XLT 4X4 Work Truck 8' bed has the 3.5 NA as standard. 2.7 and 5.0 EB & 3.5 EB cost more.
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2016 | 08:46 PM
  #7  
Wiggums's Avatar
Wiggums
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 32
Originally Posted by Hackenbush



My 2016 XLT 4X4 Work Truck 8' bed has the 3.5 NA as standard. 2.7 and 5.0 EB & 3.5 EB cost more.
Sound right. In my case, the 3.5 Ecoboost was a cheap option since my configuration required a 5.0 V8. In your case, the 3.5 Ecoboost would be a more expensive option since you're going from the 3.5 V6.. there's 2.7 EB, the 5.0 V8, and the 3.5 EB.
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2016 | 09:32 PM
  #8  
user 474747383's Avatar
user 474747383
Laughing Gas
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 177
I own a landscape Co and the 3.5 NA'a are work horses for us, Great MPG's and they pull 16' loaded tandem trailers loaded all day. We had problems with the 3.5 EB Turbo failure over 80,000 and the 5.0's were gas hogs when trailering.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2016 | 08:53 AM
  #9  
Benztechnc's Avatar
Benztechnc
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 21
From: The Ole' North State.
Originally Posted by Hackenbush
I own a landscape Co and the 3.5 NA'a are work horses for us, Great MPG's and they pull 16' loaded tandem trailers loaded all day. We had problems with the 3.5 EB Turbo failure over 80,000 and the 5.0's were gas hogs when trailering.
How many trucks did you have Turbo failure's on?
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2016 | 10:12 AM
  #10  
user 474747383's Avatar
user 474747383
Laughing Gas
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 177
Just a couple but enough to stick with what was working for us..
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2016 | 12:46 PM
  #11  
Frantz's Avatar
Frantz
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 7
From: Lewisberry, Penn
We had problems with the 3.5 EB Turbo failure over 80,000
I've not heard of any failures at such low miles before. Actually, I've yet to have a customer replace a turbo yet.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2016 | 03:42 PM
  #12  
user 474747383's Avatar
user 474747383
Laughing Gas
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 177
Good for you
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 03:08 PM
  #13  
Benztechnc's Avatar
Benztechnc
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 21
From: The Ole' North State.
What was defined as the cause for the Turbo failure at such low miles, were you able to find out?
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2016 | 03:53 PM
  #14  
user 474747383's Avatar
user 474747383
Laughing Gas
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 177
I'd have to go back a see if I still have repair orders for the trucks that were traded @ 61 My memory isn't as reliable as it once was. Don't really remember. I'm sure I would have made a note on the invoice.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
liquidlounge
2015 - 2020 F150
132
Jun 27, 2016 04:48 AM
jpadg
2009 - 2014 F150
16
Jun 29, 2014 10:42 PM
Eddie A.
2009 - 2014 F150
7
Jul 17, 2012 02:08 PM
Adobe 11SD
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel
12
Nov 17, 2010 03:27 PM
wzabawa
Car/truck Buying Advice
6
May 1, 2003 10:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 AM.